Nick Against the World (30 Viewers)

Zlatan

Senior Member
Jun 9, 2003
23,049
Fliakis said:
no you dont.


anyway, imo youre doing this just to show that you can keep him banned when most us of ask for him to be unbanned. i might be wrong, who cares, the final result is the same anyway.

imo what burke did back in the day was much much worse than anything seven ever said but he is still roaming free. im not asking for him to be banned, no, but this whole seven saga is ridiculous

And BTW, it's not just me. We agreed not to unban him, and if you ask marty I'm sure he'll support our stance.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com
Sep 28, 2002
13,975
Zlatan said:
And BTW, it's not just me. We agreed not to unban him, and if you ask marty I'm sure he'll support our stance.
who we? john said he'd check what others think about it, so i asume he wouldnt mind him, greg has even been supportive of seven, so that leaves you who's opposing. again, i might be wrong,but it seems its only you who gives fuck and insists that other noticed that
 

Zlatan

Senior Member
Jun 9, 2003
23,049
True, I did say an outright no. However, I'm not the only nor the most powerful mod, I cant decide for the other two. If they want to unban him they can, and I cant stop them.
 

Vinman

2013 Prediction Cup Champ
Jul 16, 2002
11,482
I really dont care if Seven is unbanned....he knows a thing or 2 about football

but, when he gets on to the subject of religion, then there's trouble !!






Zlatan, let me help you out with the problem your having with Fli....


FLI, THIS IS NOT A DEMOCRACY... THIS IS COMMUNISM !!!!!:ferocious :ferocious :ferocious

THE MODS MAKE THE DECISIONS HERE !!!

YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT COMMUNISM, YOU LOVE IT SO MUCH !!!!!:agree: :agree:


there Z, I think he understands now :D
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,174
mikhail said:
Cut that shit out - all three of you.
Oh please. How can you dig something up that happened days ago, something that happens everyday on this forum in multiple threads, and give us a warning for it, when a mod and another poster are throwing insults at each other just a few posts after your's. Sheesh. Selective moderation at its finest.
 

mikhail

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2003
9,576
Fliakis said:
who we? john said he'd check what others think about it, so i asume he wouldnt mind him, greg has even been supportive of seven, so that leaves you who's opposing. again, i might be wrong,but it seems its only you who gives fuck and insists that other noticed that
I did check, a couple of weeks back. Sorry if I wasn't clear on that. There was no support for unbanning Seven. He's been hassle, been banned, been hassle while banned, been reprieved, been more hassle, been more banned, been more hassle while banned... repeat ad nauseum. I don't have a personal problem with seven, but he burned his bridges with the mods here too often. We draw the line somewhere. It's here.
 

Zlatan

Senior Member
Jun 9, 2003
23,049
Andy said:
Oh please. How can you dig something up that happened days ago, something that happens everyday on this forum in multiple threads, and give us a warning for it, when a mod and another poster are throwing insults at each other just a few posts after your's. Sheesh. Selective moderation at its finest.

Yes. It's racial profiling TBH.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,174
You should seriously just unban Seven because he will continue to return with new accounts, and with his good behavior over the past couple times he was here it seems he has learned his lesson and can now respect other opinions...or at least hide his hate for them. Its better to just unban Seven than let him create 28 new user accounts within a year.
 

mikhail

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2003
9,576
Andy said:
Oh please. How can you dig something up that happened days ago, something that happens everyday on this forum in multiple threads, and give us a warning for it, when a mod and another poster are throwing insults at each other just a few posts after your's. Sheesh. Selective moderation at its finest.
I asked that it stop. If you were less concerned with what percentage of your crap I try to clean up, and instead stopped abusing half the forum, maybe I'd catch it all. In really, really clear terms: stop it.

Now, please show me where Z was calling someone a "dolt", "son of a bitch", etc.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,174
Fliakis said:
no you dont.


anyway, imo youre doing this just to show that you can keep him banned when most us of ask for him to be unbanned. i might be wrong, who cares, the final result is the same anyway.

imo what burke did back in the day was much much worse than anything seven ever said but he is still roaming free. im not asking for him to be banned, no, but this whole seven saga is ridiculous
Seven posted the same sort of stuff and after he was banned he returned only to insult members. While on the other hand, when Burke returned, he returned in a respectful fashion. That's the difference Fli.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,174
mikhail said:
I asked that it stop. If you were less concerned with what percentage of your crap I try to clean up, and instead stopped abusing half the forum, maybe I'd catch it all. In really, really clear terms: stop it.
It seems you clean up 100% of my "crap." I think that's a telling statement.
 

mikhail

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2003
9,576
Andy said:
It seems you clean up 100% of my "crap." I think that's a telling statement.
It's telling that 100% of 0 is still 0. If you have collected enough enemies that anything you say out of order is reported, I'd suggest not saying anything out of order. Or reporting back. Either way is not my problem.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 28)