Nick Against the World (77 Viewers)

OP
IncuboRossonero

IncuboRossonero

Inferiority complex
Nov 16, 2003
7,039
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #38,044
    Azzurri7 said:
    It was a crazy moment....I only remmber Inter players going nuts...
    One of the worse calls in Serie A ... ranks up there with Zambrotta's dive versus Bologna a few years back...

    inter players were not the only ones going nuts...Coach Gigi Simoni also ran onto the field to protest the call ...
     
    OP
    IncuboRossonero

    IncuboRossonero

    Inferiority complex
    Nov 16, 2003
    7,039
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #38,045
    Alfio_87 said:
    ^^^^^
    dosent make much sence does it!
    Actually it does...

    you must pass a series of tests for a drivers permit...so its not legal as of age.
    one vote in a nation with 250 million does not have many dire consequences..plus the voting percentage is always low.
    Military service for many is a career move or a way to make ends meet after high school...raising the age would just make people lounge around for a few years while they can be learning a trade and possibly get a scholarship through the army.
    Drinking requires no test...has dire consequences and is not controlled can lead to 'bad things'...so it actually makes sense that the age limit is higher than these other things
     

    Azzurri7

    Pinturicchio
    Moderator
    Dec 16, 2003
    72,692
    IncuboRossonero said:
    One of the worse calls in Serie A ... ranks up there with Zambrotta's dive versus Bologna a few years back...

    inter players were not the only ones going nuts...Coach Gigi Simoni also ran onto the field to protest the call ...
    I remmber that. What a big Scandal It was.

    Do you still remmber the Ref?
     

    The Pado

    Filthy Gobbo
    Jul 12, 2002
    9,939
    Are we still talking about the Scudetto that we "stole" from Inter in 1998? Those fookers only had 75 more minutes to create a goal and failed. Then, they had about 4 or 5 matches left to overhaul Juve. In fact, Juve drew their next match and Inter wnet completely into the toilet, so cry me a river. FACT: Valid penalty appeals are waved away in EVERY match of EVERY week.

    Let's talk about the Scudetto we "Stole" from Fiorentina in 1982. That one is really boring . . . and funny. How about Inter in 2002 - Did we steal that one too. No?

    Interesting how no Juvention EVER says that Lazio stole our Scudetto in 2001. Some may whine that confessed Lazio fan Pierluigi Collina ordered the game be played on a waterlogged pitch, but nobody says we were robbed. Interesting.
     

    Azzurri7

    Pinturicchio
    Moderator
    Dec 16, 2003
    72,692
    Padovano said:
    Are we still talking about the Scudetto that we "stole" from Inter in 1998? Those fookers only had 75 more minutes to create a goal and failed. Then, they had about 4 or 5 matches left to overhaul Juve. In fact, Juve drew their next match and Inter wnet completely into the toilet, so cry me a river. FACT: Valid penalty appeals are waved away in EVERY match of EVERY week.

    .

    :rofl2:
     

    The Pado

    Filthy Gobbo
    Jul 12, 2002
    9,939
    IncuboRossonero said:
    Oh. Capitalist money hungry corporate types no....Dictators who supress the opposition by violent means, do away with fundamental rights (freedom of speech, freedom of association, etc.) and manage a country like a drunk Denny's manager : YES.

    Gotcha ya Pado!
    Fidel Castro has lead his country for 47 years and has so drastically influenced U.S. foreign policy, more than any 10 world leaders combined in that span. Then our resident Dwarf sums up a half century of history with that cute little one-liner. OK . . . I'm thinking of a word . . . it rhymes with "Fignorant". Any guesses?
     

    Bjerknes

    "Top Economist"
    Mar 16, 2004
    116,155
    IncuboRossonero said:
    You know what a law prof. once told me ... constitutional rights are nice and dandy to keep rights in check but it rarely benefits the wrongly accused and it is always the guilty ones that hide behind the wall of "violated rights" to get charges dropped. I'm not comparing this to your situation however you do share something in common with them: you are yelling the words "rights" "police brutality" and "unfair judgment" yet you are guilty.
    You were DRINKING in public and he did have the right to call you over if he suspected an infraction was being committed...be it pissing on a Volkswagen Beetle/Beating the Bishop in a pair of Uggs boots or just hanging around a quiet part of town with a group of 5 holding something awkwardly behind your back.
    You committed an infraction drinking in public ... whether the police officer was rude and crude is another story. However, you were GUILTY
    Hahaha Sell that shit to the trailer-hick officer, Nick, who probably couldnt even spell constitutional to begin with...in case you dont know I was not "drinking in public" as I was inside the house of an adult when I had my one and a half beer. That is quite different from drinking in a public place or showing disorderly conduct while intoxicated. Afterall I blew something like a .02 on the breathalizer, something comparable to a few swigs of mouthwash. I was not drinking in public...I was not acting disordly...I was not doing anything besides walking quite soberly and looking at my beaming cell phone while wearing an Italia warmup jacket. It just doesnt make sense to call me over and let the driver of the car, as well as two other people, walk away without a care.
     
    OP
    IncuboRossonero

    IncuboRossonero

    Inferiority complex
    Nov 16, 2003
    7,039
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #38,052
    Padovano said:
    Fidel Castro has lead his country for 47 years and has so drastically influenced U.S. foreign policy, more than any 10 world leaders combined in that span. Then our resident Dwarf sums up a half century of history with that cute little one-liner. OK . . . I'm thinking of a word . . . it rhymes with "Fignorant". Any guesses?
    Guess what cupcake when someone leads a nation for a very long time it is either because a) they did away with the former laws and had their brother and mistress re-write the new laws b) ruled with an iron fist that we call "kalashnikovs" or c) did far worse than own a few television stations such as ItaliaUno and ReteQuattro try killing, jailing and cutting off the tongues of journalists who write anything even remotely anti-Government.
    Fidel may have lasted the test of time (thanks to the above) and may suddendly have gone from the brutal dictator in a nation where Doctors and Lawyers work at "Club Med" on week-ends to make ends meet and locals don't hassle tourists for fear of being sodomized by the military TO lovable token leader that every so-called anti-establishment non-conformist college kid loves. They praise Fidel for his human-ness and be-little Bush and Berlusconi because of their corporate evil...ahahaha...sheer laughable...you can kill a fellow journalist so long as you have a scruffy beard and have a picture with 'CHE'. FIGNORANT YOU SAY?? Did these people take history classes?? Did these people visit Cuba?? Have they ever spoken to a Cuban??
    Tell me Pado..I know you are not as dumb and ignorant as the long haired college brat with the CHE t-shirt and Earth Day 88 backpack so tell me..
    do you deny that Fidel has stripped every fundamental right from his citizens from Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Association to Search and Seizure??
    Are you willing to over-look these crimes because of the 'bitchin beard' and the fact he smokes kick-ass cigars??

    :pint:
     
    OP
    IncuboRossonero

    IncuboRossonero

    Inferiority complex
    Nov 16, 2003
    7,039
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #38,054
    RochemBeck said:
    Hahaha Sell that shit to the trailer-hick officer, Nick, who probably couldnt even spell constitutional to begin with...in case you dont know I was not "drinking in public" as I was inside the house of an adult when I had my one and a half beer. That is quite different from drinking in a public place or showing disorderly conduct while intoxicated. Afterall I blew something like a .02 on the breathalizer, something comparable to a few swigs of mouthwash. I was not drinking in public...I was not acting disordly...I was not doing anything besides walking quite soberly and looking at my beaming cell phone while wearing an Italia warmup jacket. It just doesnt make sense to call me over and let the driver of the car, as well as two other people, walk away without a care.
    Dude you are not of drinking age...so whether you sipped a beer or drank a keg you are still guilty...that is something you are having difficulty with. Your problem is with the infraction itself..in that case save up some cash and get a lawyer to declare it unconstitutional..and Good Luck..you will need it.
     

    The Pado

    Filthy Gobbo
    Jul 12, 2002
    9,939
    No, Nick, I don't deny the suppression of liberties in Castro's Cuba. During my time in Cuba I have felt very much free of government interference but it was obvious that the Cubans were unable to be so comfortable.

    However, I should point out that you are in no position to make such an argument while promoting your beloved Bush-man on the day when Bush has attempted to make eavsdropping on "ordinary Americans" telephone conversations the standard practice.

    Let's face it, it only took one well-planned attack on the US to turn this country into a police state. One friggin' blow and the Great USA was defeated :tdown:
     
    Apr 12, 2004
    77,165
    RochemBeck said:
    Hahaha Sell that shit to the trailer-hick officer, Nick, who probably couldnt even spell constitutional to begin with...in case you dont know I was not "drinking in public" as I was inside the house of an adult when I had my one and a half beer. That is quite different from drinking in a public place or showing disorderly conduct while intoxicated. Afterall I blew something like a .02 on the breathalizer, something comparable to a few swigs of mouthwash. I was not drinking in public...I was not acting disordly...I was not doing anything besides walking quite soberly and looking at my beaming cell phone while wearing an Italia warmup jacket. It just doesnt make sense to call me over and let the driver of the car, as well as two other people, walk away without a care.

    This story is true.

    I was there.
     

    Enron

    Tickle Me
    Moderator
    Oct 11, 2005
    75,665
    IncuboRossonero said:
    You know what a law prof. once told me ... constitutional rights are nice and dandy to keep rights in check but it rarely benefits the wrongly accused and it is always the guilty ones that hide behind the wall of "violated rights" to get charges dropped. I'm not comparing this to your situation however you do share something in common with them: you are yelling the words "rights" "police brutality" and "unfair judgment" yet you are guilty.
    You were DRINKING in public and he did have the right to call you over if he suspected an infraction was being committed...be it pissing on a Volkswagen Beetle/Beating the Bishop in a pair of Uggs boots or just hanging around a quiet part of town with a group of 5 holding something awkwardly behind your back.
    You committed an infraction drinking in public ... whether the police officer was rude and crude is another story. However, you were GUILTY
    :faq1: Andy was walking in public. Having drank in my room earlier. He did not blow a count greater than the legal limit on his breathalizer. Therefore he was not drunk. And not drunk in public.

    :faq1: The argument is not of a rude police officer but of a wrong police officer. The two accusations are totally different. One usually involves a shouting of Rodney King.

    :faq1: In the US a police officer needs to have probable cause to search or perform tests on a subject. If the officer has no PC his/her evidence may only be heard as heresay in a court of law and therefore chucked out. In this case, in my legal opinion, the officer did not have probable cause.

    :faq1: FREE ANDY!!!
     

    Enron

    Tickle Me
    Moderator
    Oct 11, 2005
    75,665
    Padovano said:
    No, Nick, I don't deny the suppression of liberties in Castro's Cuba. During my time in Cuba I have felt very much free of government interference but it was obvious that the Cubans were unable to be so comfortable.

    However, I should point out that you are in no position to make such an argument while promoting your beloved Bush-man on the day when Bush has attempted to make eavsdropping on "ordinary Americans" telephone conversations the standard practice.

    Let's face it, it only took one well-planned attack on the US to turn this country into a police state. One friggin' blow and the Great USA was defeated :tdown:
    We shall overcome... We shall overcome... We shall overcome...some day...someday...:agree:
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 77)