Nick Against the World (96 Viewers)

Sep 28, 2002
13,975
RochemBeck said:
It's pretty obvious why Zlatan banned Seven...he was mocking people of religion and being disrespectful to others. No matter how you look at it, Seven's actions are against the rules and he was warned by Z several times. He had it coming really..
now try replacing seven with burke. same story if you ask me.


and im not trying to get burke ban or anything. just like he said, i also start to kinda like him.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
115,984
Fliakis said:
now try replacing seven with burke. same story if you ask me.


and im not trying to get burke ban or anything. just like he said, i also start to kinda like him.
Burke has been warned and he has since toned down his behavior regarding such topics.
 

Dragon

Senior Member
Apr 24, 2003
27,407
RochemBeck said:
It's pretty obvious why Zlatan banned Seven...he was mocking people of religion and being disrespectful to others. No matter how you look at it, Seven's actions are against the rules and he was warned by Z several times. He had it coming really..

Not to be a bitch or anything but Burke said something about Mark Luke Paul and John being motherfuckers
 

The Pado

Filthy Gobbo
Jul 12, 2002
9,939
I'm out.

But first: Seven was banned because he commanded Axl to fook himself in the arse. That is simply discourteous and uncalled for. In short, Seven lost the debate and was sent off as the "weakest link". Good-bye.
 

Respaul

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
4,734
RochemBeck said:
It's pretty obvious why Zlatan banned Seven...he was mocking people of religion and being disrespectful to others.
So why isnt Lou banned then, he does exactly the same (if anything worse) jus to the unbelievers rather than to the believers
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
115,984
Padovano said:
I'm out.

But first: Seven was banned because he commanded Axl to fook himself in the arse. That is simply discourteous and uncalled for. In short, Seven lost the debate and was sent off as the "weakest link". Good-bye.
Exactly. Well said Mr. Padovano.


Paul, I never said anything about Lou or his actions.
 

Respaul

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
4,734
I know you didnt andy, but the point is if people are to follow the rules as you say.. then it has to be fair... eg. everyone is treated the same... this is not the case here...

Lou is relevant here as the subject in this case was religion...

Now Lou... allthough i quite like the guy... is in my view the most insulting member this forum has ever had when it comes to religious matters... He continually crosses the line with posts of a highly insulting and disrespectful tone... Yet there has never been any mention of him getting banned... but if its seven... fvck it ! ban him... not fair in my book
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
115,984
I concur with you Paul, Lou is very intolerant, however he was not even warned to tone down his actions...Seven was warned time and time again. I'm sorry but that is the difference my friend.
 

Respaul

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
4,734
RochemBeck said:
I concur with you Paul, Lou is very intolerant, however he was not even warned to tone down his actions...Seven was warned time and time again. I'm sorry but that is the difference my friend.
either way, Its the moderating at fault... Why wasnt lou warned ?

Why wasnt a solution found with seven without banning him...

Why should seven tone down even after a warning if the likes of lou are allowed to continue in that manor without question...

Whos to say seven etc wouldnt change their ways if it was a level field with everyone being treated the same...
 
Dec 19, 2005
43
a)
Seven said:
Look, axl, you can believe in whatever God you want to, but saying the Qu'ran was not written by man is disregarding all sense of logic. (And if God did exist, why would he bless us with a sense of logic that disregarded something like that?)

About the argument "you can't prove you're right either", I'll say just this:

God himself told me yesterday I was the greatest man EVER. He even told me I was his son. Then he went on about how I should start a new religion, but only after I've written down every word he dictates me.

I'm just as believable as The Prophet or Jesus to be frank. You can't prove I'm lying.
b)
Seven said:
And come to think about it, I'll go really far in this one. I believe that no religion based on a book is worth believing. That's right, I spit on the beliefs of catholics, moslims and whoever truly believe in something written down by man. However, I support people who believe in the existence of God and try to fill their lives as they please. Being religious is a human reflex and a good one for all I care, but believing a book is fucked up.
I'll just suppose I got unfairly banned for one of those two.

a) When I tell axlrose to fuck himself in the ass, I'm not saying he really should. I am however making it clear that not being able to prove something, doesn't mean you proved the opposite. E.g. "You can't prove God exist" is no argument for his existance. I don't see anything else that could have been wrong here.

b) Yep, I see why you're shocked, Zlatan. Then again, Lou has gotten off with much worse. Or isn't calling gay guys animals that bad anyway? And yes, I don't give a damn about the Bible or the Qu'ran and yes, I do find people who do total and utter morons. And they are, they undoubtedly are and I can and will prove so:

When do you call someone a moron? When he isn't capable of rational thinking. We can all agree that when being rational, the likeliness of the Bible and the Qu'ran being right and really being written by God is very low. So if you choose to disregard this logic, you're a moron.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 96)