Nick Against the World (110 Viewers)

jaecole

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2005
3,017
Difference is you actually have never said anything. When I'm bashing you, not that I have much, I've had something to say, not just throwing my name in for brownie points.

I fail to see the purpose, but if you have one then sure continue.

And why the Blandest thing again? Do I mention Burke/Nick/Some other American when every time I'm talking with you? No, cause it's irrelevent. I'm posting to you about your posts on religion, that is all. Why complicate?

Edit: Not to I will continue. You obviously have nothing to say. Nick took the 'don't have enough respect for you to post with you' excuse, you can use it to. Hell quote it!
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,166
Hey, you were the one who called me out simply because I said nice post, and I concur. You have a problem with that? Deal with it, because you have done the exact same thing before. You're making such a big deal out of nothing and I hate having to explain my posts time and time again.

I have nothing to say? Hell yeah I have something to say. You stated you didn't remember saying something about the skin of Italians, yet Nick just proved you wrong by posting that wonderful little quote of your's. You were wrong all along and played the victim for too long. That's what I have to say.

And this has nothing to do with Blandest or anybody else. You called me out for making a simple concur post, yet you have done the exact same thing in the past. It's simple, no need to cry about it.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,166
++ [ originally posted by Blandest ] ++
Or maybe it was Burke. I always get you two mixed up. Though atleast Burke has balls and I know Ive seen one.
Would you like to see mine as well? You could easily kill two birds with one stone by resquesting it. :)
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 109)