Nick Against the World (47 Viewers)

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,325
++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++


Seven makes it seem like its not an important event at all, and that nobody should care what happend. He insisted to make a mockery out of just a picture of remembrance, and he shouldn't be wondering why everyone is pissed at him.
FFS Andy, I'm going to ask you this one more time: at least have the decency to read my posts.

It's an important event alright, and I'm not against remembering 9/11 but I am against the way how people have reacted towards it. Apparently 9/11 has given the US the right to attack whoever they want and if we dare to say that's not how things work we're irresponsable.

Everyone's making it sound like more people are killed by terrorists than by hunger. Which simply isn't true and therefore is ridicolous.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,325
++ [ originally posted by Fliakis ] ++
actually he should be running for his life. the way things are going usually in this place, i can see this discussion derailing to something nasty and that would cause a padlock. then incubo would come and see this. then seven would be dead. :D
I'd be honoured to be the cause of the closing down of this famous thread :D.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
115,964
++ [ originally posted by Fliakis ] ++
actually he should be running for his life. the way things are going usually in this place, i can see this discussion derailing to something nasty and that would cause a padlock. then incubo would come and see this. then seven would be dead. :D
You got that right Fli. :D
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
115,964
++ [ originally posted by Seven ] ++


FFS Andy, I'm going to ask you this one more time: at least have the decency to read my posts.

It's an important event alright, and I'm not against remembering 9/11 but I am against the way how people have reacted towards it. Apparently 9/11 has given the US the right to attack whoever they want and if we dare to say that's not how things work we're irresponsable.

Everyone's making it sound like more people are killed by terrorists than by hunger. Which simply isn't true and therefore is ridicolous.
FFS Seven, I've read your posts and I know what you wanted to do. Its simple. Stop trying to make it seem like its anything else than that.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,325
++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++


FFS Seven, I've read your posts and I know what you wanted to do. Its simple. Stop trying to make it seem like its anything else than that.
µ

You really are stupid, aren't you? So you actually believe I'm trying to say 3000 deaths means nothing? You did NOT read my posts Andy, or you didn't understand them. Which would be logical given your boundless stupidity.

I said there are WORSE things than 9/11 and terrorism to worry about. I did NOT say 9/11 wasn't a bad thing.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
115,964
++ [ originally posted by Seven ] ++
µ

You really are stupid, aren't you? So you actually believe I'm trying to say 3000 deaths means nothing? You did NOT read my posts Andy, or you didn't understand them. Which would be logical given your boundless stupidity.

I said there are WORSE things than 9/11 and terrorism to worry about. I did NOT say 9/11 wasn't a bad thing.
That all is not what I'm reffering to you ignorant bastard. My main point is you couldn't leave the subject alone, and you had to make a mockery out of it by trying to change the subject, which started with you posting that ridiculous picture full of unwanted sarcasm. And besides that, you kept on going why you don't think 9/11 was important. STOP trying to avoid that you stupid imbecile.

And I'm finished with this. Go back to your hippie protesting for human rights. :rolleyes:
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,325
Could you please read my original two posts Andy? They weren't sarcastic at all. Just read those, I think you'll understand me better.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,325
++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++
Don't have an answer for my first paragraph Seven? Huh, what a surprise. Glad I ended it with that. ;)
Oh Puh-lease, you never even bothered to answer my arguments. Your first paragraph was nothing besides talking trash about me, so why would I bother to answer?
 

River

Senior Member
Jun 15, 2004
2,261
Guys just drop it. Who gives a flying fuck what anyones opinion is on it right now? Whats it even matter. Anyone posting a 'forget 9/11 save the god damn dolphins' only posted that for the attention. Take it to PM or something. This is extremely boring to read. Same shit same shit same shit. Its over.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,325
"Well, no one ever brought it up on another day and I wouldn't have started about it. I just about had it with all that 9/11 stuff. I've heared so much about it, read so much about it, watched so much about. Every day I have to hear about that war against terrorism-crap, while Bush could be out there saving lives instead of sacrificing them.

What disturbs me is that you seem to think, Andy, that I don't agree that you remember this day. I do and I do find it sorry that you lost someone that day, but things should remain in proportion you know. The situation in Africa and other parts of the world is a lot more urgent than the war against terrorism.

And I believe we would even fight terrorism by fighting world hunger."

This is my point of view. Now read this Andy, and try to understand.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,325
++ [ originally posted by River ] ++
Anyone posting a 'forget 9/11 save the god damn dolphins'
True, Africans aren't like people or something. Just about the same importance as dolphins. Now, seals, that's important.
 

The Pado

Filthy Gobbo
Jul 12, 2002
9,939
++ [ originally posted by Seven ] ++


Yeah, human rights, pff, who cares about them :rolleyes:.
What an American attitude.
America has only been committing crimes against humanity for approx. 75 years. Seven, you want to play America vs. Europe? Many of the nations of Europe have been committing crimes against humanity for several centuries. So, which nation with clean hands do you come from? England (we never had an empire), Germany (what Nazi's?), France (Napoleaon who?), Russia (It's not our fault, Stalin was Georgian!), Serbia (Hey, Croats and Kosovars kill people too), Turkey (Let the Kurds find their own country)? Which one?

As for Africa, you saw my post regarding the fact that the USA sends mor in aid than all nations on earth combined, but I ask you this -- Did America ever colonize in Africa? No, but I'll bet your homeland did. So, who should be more responsible to those Africans now??
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,325
++ [ originally posted by Padovano ] ++


America has only been committing crimes against humanity for approx. 75 years. Seven, you want to play America vs. Europe? Many of the nations of Europe have been committing crimes against humanity for several centuries. So, which nation with clean hands do you come from? England (we never had an empire), Germany (what Nazi's?), France (Napoleaon who?), Russia (It's not our fault, Stalin was Georgian!), Serbia (Hey, Croats and Kosovars kill people too), Turkey (Let the Kurds find their own country)? Which one?

As for Africa, you saw my post regarding the fact that the USA sends mor in aid than all nations on earth combined, but I ask you this -- Did America ever colonize in Africa? No, but I'll bet your homeland did. So, who should be more responsible to those Africans now??
I'm not going to deny Europe has done several dreadful things in the past. But I didn't want to discuss about this. And even if they did, who cares? America was founded by slaughtering Indians, so what? And I'm from Belgium btw.

My homeland did colonize in Africa and your country took away every strong african man as a slave, yes. We're both responsible anyway.
 

River

Senior Member
Jun 15, 2004
2,261
++ [ originally posted by Seven ] ++
"Well, no one ever brought it up on another day and I wouldn't have started about it. I just about had it with all that 9/11 stuff. I've heared so much about it, read so much about it, watched so much about. Every day I have to hear about that war against terrorism-crap, while Bush could be out there saving lives instead of sacrificing them.

What disturbs me is that you seem to think, Andy, that I don't agree that you remember this day. I do and I do find it sorry that you lost someone that day, but things should remain in proportion you know. The situation in Africa and other parts of the world is a lot more urgent than the war against terrorism.

And I believe we would even fight terrorism by fighting world hunger."

This is my point of view. Now read this Andy, and try to understand.
So you expect Americans and Britons to put aside OUR OWN problems and national security to go fight world hunger? Have you any idea how many terrorist attacks are intercepted in the UK due to our efforts in preventing terrorism? Do you want us to go to africa and let mother fucking murders blow up our citys? Get your head outta your ass for a second and think.

Also fighting against world hunger. Both UK and US do alot to help. We dont have to, but we do. Alot of money, volunteers etc go there including people i know. Thats more than youve done. yet your *****ing on about it. Dont feed us this crap. And its not like its something that you can just throw money at and its gone. You want us to build a civilisation or something? Dude...

Last yes people are dying of hunger. But how many people are dying everything with something? Lets just tackle then all and to hell with the whole self defense thing :rolleyes:.

Now PLEEEASEE shut up
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 46)