Nick Against the World (77 Viewers)

IlDivinCodino

f**king hot prospect
Mar 5, 2006
1,191
denco said:
No my memory bank is fuzzy, remind me how he fucked everything up at Juventus when it mattered most. If you are talking about our Cl campaign, it was doomed even without his red cards. Our not winning more CLs was not down to him as he played well in every final and got us there with sublime play in the first place. In the league he won 2 scudetti under Lippi and we were woeful bar him under Ancelotti. Its not his fault it decided to rain in Perugia. It was not his fault when Van Der Saar was dropping clangers or am i missing something here?
you've said it all right here.........
you're just denying the fact that his dismissal did affect us.
if Zidane was the one who brought us to the finals, then he should finish his job!!!
you're making it seems as if the red cards didn't mattered at all
 

The Pado

Filthy Gobbo
Jul 12, 2002
9,939
By now you all have read the verdicts:

Serie B with a 30 point deduction is rather harsh in my opinion when you consider that we also lose 2 Scudetti. How to make up a 30 point deficit?
 

The Pado

Filthy Gobbo
Jul 12, 2002
9,939
ßömßärdîër said:
I read somewhere that if they appeal and fail, that the penalty will be steeper.

I heard that too, but that threat defies every notion of a justice system. You have a constitutional right to appeal, but if you do we shall damn you to hell. Blind justice, right?
 

Geof

Senior Member
May 14, 2004
6,740
The Pado said:
I heard that too, but that threat defies every notion of a justice system. You have a constitutional right to appeal, but if you do we shall damn you to hell. Blind justice, right?
That's very weird indeed. I any legal system you can't lose anything if you go to appeal (only pay more judicial costs of course).
The only way things might get worse is that the prosecutor also appeals the decision, asking for harder punishment. Which is very unlikely.
Unless the FIGC is that fucked up

I think that we should be able to reduce the point penalty to -15. That would be a bit more bearable.

And I don't want to look at Milan, but seriously: -15 points and no CL is a pathetic joke, and I'm not in the mood for a laugh right now.

God I'm gonna get drunk.
 

The Pado

Filthy Gobbo
Jul 12, 2002
9,939
ßömßärdîër said:
I agree, you get 20 years for murder, ohh you didnt do it? Wrong, now you get 30 years.

Makes no sense.
Not exactly a correct analogy, but it would be like the court reviews the trial and 20-year sentence from the lower court and rules that they find no serious errors, but just for having the audacity to seek judicial review the sentence is increased to 30 years.
 

The Pado

Filthy Gobbo
Jul 12, 2002
9,939
Geof said:
That's very weird indeed. I any legal system you can't lose anything if you go to appeal (only pay more judicial costs of course).
The only way things might get worse is that the prosecutor also appeals the decision, asking for harder punishment. Which is very unlikely.
Unless the FIGC is that fucked up

I think that we should be able to reduce the point penalty to -15. That would be a bit more bearable.

And I don't want to look at Milan, but seriously: -15 points and no CL is a pathetic joke, and I'm not in the mood for a laugh right now.

God I'm gonna get drunk.
That is the way I see it, but I don't know potatoes about Italian Judicial system.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 1, Guests: 74)

  • Bozi