Nick Against the World (48 Viewers)

[Negative Creep]

omg fantastic Chelsea. You knock out Barca you can knock out anyone.

Chelsea outplayed Barca tonight. I loved it. Ac Milan you got it coming

Chelsea for CL 2005.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[IncuboRossonero]

AHAHHAHAHAHHAHA

CHELSEA..SMELL-SEA....

WE SHALL KAKA ALL OVER THEIR SORRY ARSE'S

:cheesy:

your a real creep...a negative creep :dontcare:

 

[Negative Creep]

Come on Nick. If I can appreciate Milans win over MU. Surely you can appreciate Chelseas win over Barca.

It was great. Great for Chelsea, great for english football. I wish them well.

Milan Chelsea final im hoping. Thats the best teams in Europe.

 

[Negative Creep]

Ronaldinho's second btw. What a friggin goal

 

[Dragon]

++ [ originally posted by Negative Creep ] ++
omg fantastic Chelsea. You knock out Barca you can knock out anyone.

Chelsea outplayed Barca tonight. I loved it. Ac Milan you got it coming

Chelsea for CL 2005.

Chelsea did not outplay Barcelona tonight. Im sorry

 

[Negative Creep]

Oh come on. Second half was all Chelsea baby.

 

[Dragon]

Yeah Barcelona became crap towards the end, but if Eto'o had scored that goal it wouldnt have mattered

I hate Chelsea. I wanted Barca to win the Champions in a final against Milan

 

[Negative Creep]

But Chelsea deserved it. So too bad for you.

Like I said before, you might not like the english style but nothing can compete with the english determination. Chelsea worked hard for the win, they completely deserve it.

 

[Bjerknes]

Chelsea got lucky as hell that Eto'o missed a sitter.

And no, Chelsea deserved it as much as Barca. At least the latter had control of the match.

 

[Negative Creep]

Barca had control? Did you watch the end at all?

Chelsea had many shots that could have won it. They would have been extremely unlucky to go out.

Lets face facts though. Chelsea 4-2 Barca. Speaks for itself.

Milan can bring it, but Juve cant IMO.

Andy dont throw away the credibility you have by claiming Barca should have won.

 

[Bjerknes]

++ [ originally posted by Negative Creep ] ++
Barca had control? Did you watch the end at all?

Chelsea had many shots that could have won it. They would have been extremely unlucky to go out.

Lets face facts though. Chelsea 4-2 Barca. Speaks for itself.

Milan can bring it, but Juve cant IMO.

Andy dont throw away the credibility you have by claiming Barca should have won.

Chelsea would have been extremely lucky to go out? That's rubbish. It could have gone either way, especially if Eto'o would have scored and that Terry goal would have been called back (which it should have been).

Saying that Chelsea would have been extremely unlucky to go out is a farce because they could not hold Barca. The latter's defense is absolute garbage anyway.

 

[Negative Creep]

++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++


Chelsea would have been extremely lucky to go out? That's rubbish. It could have gone either way, especially if Eto'o would have scored and that Terry goal would have been called back (which it should have been).

Saying that Chelsea would have been extremely unlucky to go out is a farce because they could not hold Barca. The latter's defense is absolute garbage anyway.

Whatever. Barca have been displaced in a game by 2 goals. Sing your italian styled conspiracy all you want.

 

[Bjerknes]

++ [ originally posted by Negative Creep ] ++


Whatever. Barca have been displaced in a game by 2 goals. Sing your italian styled conspiracy all you want.

What conspiracy? I am just saying that Chelsea was not as good as you talk them up to be and either team could have won tonight. Barca was unlucky that the Terry goal stood because it was clear obstruction on Valdes and Eto'o of course missed the sitter. I think Barca was unlucky but I suppose Chelsea could have gone as well and did.

 

[Negative Creep]

Barca should have tried to play football instead of sitting on what they had. You do that against Chelsea and you will lose and they did. Lesson learned.

 

[Bjerknes]

++ [ originally posted by Negative Creep ] ++
Barca should have tried to play football instead of sitting on what they had. You do that against Chelsea and you will lose and they did. Lesson learned.

You could say the same thing about Chelsea. They started to sit back against Barca and they came back with two goals from Ronnie. If Etoo would have scored and it ended up 3-3 I would have said Chelsea was sitting back too much and you simply can't do that.

Problem with Barca is that their tactics leave them exposed at the back and their defense cant handle the counters. You can't win the CL without a solid defense and I have said that many times before.

 

[Vinman]

OK...its 11 pm est and where is everyone ???

 

[Bjerknes]

Majed, Elnur, Nick....whats going on?

 

[flieeeekke]

++ [ originally posted by IncuboRossonero ] ++


a joke that went over many heads...

Brocchi rarely plays in CL

Fiore is the 3rd string keeper .

isnt it fiori?

 

[flieeeekke]

++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++


Real professionals shake the hands of the opposition, not sulk in the glory. I hate shit like that.

andy, stop *****ing. barca lost, get over it. mourinho is the best tactician in the world today and he proved it. barca defence sucked, they got only themselves to blame. chelsea were better. period.


not that im happy about it.

 

[flieeeekke]

++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++

And no, Chelsea deserved it as much as Barca. At least the latter had control of the match.

they couldnt get the ball into the penalty box. barca had possession, not control. once again, mourinho.