News that makes you say WTF! (41 Viewers)

[Völler]

http://www.theamericanmirror.com/video-agitators-hurl-gay-slurs-milwaukee-police/




So much anger for a BLACK cop shooting an armed black man after he pointed his weapon at the officer.

Here he is:

---





- - - Updated - - -

http://www.jsonline.com/story/news/...e-subject-witness-intimidation-case/88721094/

The American Mirror? What the hell is that?

- - - Updated - - -

http://www.theamericanmirror.com/the-top-five-most-racist-presidents-in-american-history/

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[swag]

American Mirror

 

[Seven]

Man, you guys have some of the deepest race issues I've ever seen. It's almost easier and safer to just be blatantly racist .

 

[ALC]

The American Mirror? What the hell is that?

- - - Updated - - -

http://www.theamericanmirror.com/the-top-five-most-racist-presidents-in-american-history/

I knew as soon as I saw the title that Obama would be #1.

@Hustini you can find better sources than the politics version of bleacher report bro

 

[Enron]

 

[Hust]

I knew as soon as I saw the title that Obama would be #1.

@Hustini you can find better sources than the politics version of bleacher report bro

It's a video. Does it matter where it came from when the video is unedited and all over the Internet?

 

[Enron]

Yes Cam it always matters.

 

[Seven]

I like that it is nonsensical:

But President Obama is easily the number one racist president because his obsession with skin color is a cover for something much more insidious.

President Obama wants communist revolution.

I just don't even.. Whoever wrote this piece does no longer exist for me.

 

[Völler]

I knew as soon as I saw the title that Obama would be #1.

Exactly!

 

[Hust]

Yes Cam it always matters.

Why?

Because it isn't CNN or MSNBC?

 

[Enron]

Depends on how retarded you want to look.

 

[Hust]

I could post it from Twitter, YouTube or any other source covering it. It wouldn't have changed anything.

 

[ALC]

Bill Clinton and Obama top five most racist presidents

 

[Juliano13]

So it's lies and propaganda?

Part that and part ignorance.

USA wants to bypass the ineffective WTO and negotiate trade agreements on its own. That's great for all parties because free trade is good. In fact, that's probably the one thing that most economists agree on. People who think that a free trade agreement is part of some giant conspiracy for world domination and the evil corporations and all the crap are either retards or have a commie agenda.

Here's Krugman for you: http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www/ricardo.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_advantage

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

Part that and part ignorance.

USA wants to bypass the ineffective WTO and negotiate trade agreements on its own. That's great for all parties because free trade is good. In fact, that's probably the one thing that most economists agree on. People who think that a free trade agreement is part of some giant conspiracy for world domination and the evil corporations and all the crap are either retards or have a commie agenda.

Here's Krugman for you: http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www/ricardo.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_advantage

Commie agenda... sure.

I'll look at the links later.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

I opened the links and they are walls of text that have nothing to do with what I posted

 

[Juliano13]

I opened the links and they are walls of text that have nothing to do with what I posted

I'll look for an audible version for you. Better learn to read, though.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

I'll look for an audible version for you. Better learn to read, though.

I knew it was a waste of time replying to you. You never have anything useful to say, that's why I ignored you the first time.

 

[Maddy]

I knew it was a waste of time replying to you. You never have anything useful to say, that's why I ignored you the first time.

You are right and his claim about free trade being that great is just an opinion. Nothing more.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_trade_debate - Is a good place to start to read easily about pros and cons.

TTIP is the purest shite. Something I hope dies sooner than later.

https://www.theguardian.com/busines...nsatlantic-trade-investment-partnership-guide

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices...-why-the-answer-should-scare-you-9779688.html

 

[Ocelot]

Part that and part ignorance.

USA wants to bypass the ineffective WTO and negotiate trade agreements on its own. That's great for all parties because free trade is good. In fact, that's probably the one thing that most economists agree on. People who think that a free trade agreement is part of some giant conspiracy for world domination and the evil corporations and all the crap are either retards or have a commie agenda.

Here's Krugman for you: http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www/ricardo.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparative_advantage

Bypassing the WTO is one thing, desperately trying every dirty move in the book to bypass each and every democratic institution is another. Of course they have to do that, because as soon as the people or even their legislative representatives get to know the details of the agreement, they're naturally against it.

Free Trade is good and well, but those FTA (at least TTIP, but pretty sure it's not much different with the Trans Pacific version) are a disgrace, and pretty muc the epitome of what it going tremendously wrong in modern politics and this version of capitalism.

- - - Updated - - -

Also, while pretty much all economists agree that free trade is a good thing in principle, there are a lot of conditions in which plenty of economists rightfully point out that it's a pretty stupid thing to do for a lot of the parties & stakeholders involved.