no dude, nobody forgot that, and it doesn't make arthur any cheaper. let's not go into a lesson about ticiconomics either, we've been through this a couple of times.
it's very simple: arthur is a player that costs more than 20m per season. only costa, de ligt and ronaldo are/were more expensive. and he's only a squad player with questionable mentality and physical state, who failed to show any consistency in europe. at least he's young and has some potential, but what he showed so far is just insufficient compared to the investment the club made.
- - - Updated - - -