agreed about the unwarranted inzaghi hate. but sarri playing good attacking football is an unfounded argument. we could see three sarri teams lately: empoli, napoli and chelsea.
- his empoli team was a relatively well defending team, with high possession and a lot of passes, but one of the less open play goals that season, and low shot count. a typical italian mid-table team with good organization and a lot of short passes, but not attacking at all. sarri did well with them by securing serie a for that newcomer team, he deserves credit for it, but they stayed up with their organization, not with their attack.
- napoli has been an attacking minded team even under mazzarri and benítez, sarri only fine tuned that team and put jorginho in the center of their gameplay. if you look at napoli's squad, you can't even defend with those players. imagine any coach playing defensive game with players like mertens, insigne, hamsik, callejon and co.
- and this chelsea. fucking hell, what a boring team that is. their only player with any intuition and actual creativity is hazard. i have completely different ideas about good attacking football. juve under lippi in the late '90s or bayern '12-13 was good attacking football. i even enjoyed that shakhtar we were in the same cl group with in '12. gasp's atalanta is fun too. sarri's chelsea isn't good attacking football at all.
