'Murica! (342 Viewers)

kappa96

Senior Member
Jun 20, 2018
7,469
As long as Mr. Trump outlaws them queer movies from Hollywood it's fine by me
He won the "culture war" , by antagonizing all of it's allies .
Europeans will never look at the USA the same, if he succeds with his "negociations".
By "negociations" I mean bending over for putin and giving him the full buffet .
The russians finally did it.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

s4tch

Senior Member
Mar 23, 2015
33,524
this is a disgraceful piece of shit, no other way to put it. shame on every single one who voted for this literal traitor, for one reason or an other.

some comments are gold though


- - - Updated - - -

look, a republican with brain and spine. more of this please, the sooner the better.

 
Last edited:

icemaη

Rab's Husband - The Regista
Moderator
Aug 27, 2008
36,316
this is a disgraceful piece of shit, no other way to put it. shame on every single one who voted for this literal traitor, for one reason or an other.

some comments are gold though


- - - Updated - - -

look, a republican with brain and spine. more of this please, the sooner the better.

Elon writing a check to primary this guy out as we speak
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,884
It's crazy how intoxicating power is to the human mind.

Trump is a 78 year old obese man. Even under the best circumstances he does not look appealing. Yet neither Musk nor Putin can resist him when he gets down on his knees and begs for their cock.
I think a lot of this is about legacy for him. Not necessarily a great one but he's too stupid to realise. Like you say, he's 78, has a McDonald's per day, he might not even see out 4 years. He's going pedal to the floor with everything and I think that's trying to leave whatever mark he can before he dies. I don't buy the MAGA stuff. I believe he's a nationalist, probably an isolationist, but is ultimately self-serving.

Smart people tend to be thinkers so on one hand more calculated, but also more likely to be fearful and weigh up risk. Trump is adversarial and impetuous, petty like a child. For me that's more worrying.

Obviously he likes Putin because Putin says nice things about him, that's the make up of the guy. Putin is the manipulator, he knows he only has to massage his ego and he has him on side.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,311
I think a lot of this is about legacy for him. Not necessarily a great one but he's too stupid to realise. Like you say, he's 78, has a McDonald's per day, he might not even see out 4 years. He's going pedal to the floor with everything and I think that's trying to leave whatever mark he can before he dies. I don't buy the MAGA stuff. I believe he's a nationalist, probably an isolationist, but is ultimately self-serving.

Smart people tend to be thinkers so on one hand more calculated, but also more likely to be fearful and weigh up risk. Trump is adversarial and impetuous, petty like a child. For me that's more worrying.

Obviously he likes Putin because Putin says nice things about him, that's the make up of the guy. Putin is the manipulator, he knows he only has to massage his ego and he has him on side.
I've thought about this as well, but thinking about legacy requires the capacity to think into the future.

Personally I believe Trump is all about instant reward. He just does and says stuff, because it feels good in the moment.
 

AFL_ITALIA

MAGISTERIAL
Jun 17, 2011
31,781
Can't imagine why.

Trump's First Month Has Traders Ditching America-First Wagers

A month into President Donald Trump’s second term, the euphoria is fading around many of the trades that investors piled into after his November victory, from stocks to the dollar to Bitcoin.

Bloomberg) — A month into President Donald Trump’s second term, the euphoria is fading around many of the trades that investors piled into after his November victory, from stocks to the dollar to Bitcoin.
Article content
Article content

Instead of extending the period of US exceptionalism in global equities, the S&P 500 Index’s record run has still left it trailing European, Chinese and Mexican benchmarks. The dollar’s strength and bearish bets on US Treasuries are both losing steam. Even the breathless rally in cryptocurrencies and related stocks has wilted.
Article content

That’s not how investors saw things playing out immediately after the Nov. 5 election, which unleashed a wave of risk-on wagers that sent stocks, the dollar, Treasury yields and Bitcoin soaring. The bet was that Trump’s pledged policy mix of deregulation, tax cuts and protectionist measures would ignite economic growth and inflation.

Instead, investors say, the hallmark of the first 30 days of his term has been a dizzying blitz of tariff threats. The latest came this week as the president said he would likely impose levies on automobile, semiconductor and pharmaceutical imports of around 25%, potentially widening his trade war.

Investor sentiment has been growing steadily more bearish over the past month, reflecting worries that tariffs may spark quicker inflation, keeping the Federal Reserve from cutting rates further and weighing on growth.

“There was an overshooting of rampant optimism without investors really thinking it through,” said Eric Diton, president of Wealth Alliance.

Here’s how so-called Trump trades are playing out across asset classes, one month after Inauguration Day:

Small-Cap Reversal

The biggest winner within US equities in the immediate aftermath of Trump’s victory was small-cap stocks.

Investors bet that these companies, which are typically more domestic-focused, would be among the primary beneficiaries of an administration that wanted to boost the economy and protect local businesses with tariffs. The day after the vote, the Russell 2000 Index of small-cap shares surged 5.8%, its biggest gain in three years. Yet by the end of November it had peaked, and it’s now roughly 1% above its Nov. 5 close.

“Mid- and small-cap stocks were projected to shine under Trump’s second term as these asset classes are more insulated from probable trade wars,” said Eric Sterner, chief investment officer at Apollon Wealth.

They have struggled to keep up with large caps, he said, because elevated interest rates put pressure on smaller firms, which usually have a higher debt burden.

Energy and financial stocks were also a focus after Trump’s win. The S&P 500 Energy Index rallied right after the election, but has surrendered that advance and is currently little changed from Nov. 5 levels, similar to the price of oil. The S&P 500 Financials Index, on the other hand, is up 12%, driven mainly by solid bank earnings.

“Investors had big hopes for this sector due to deregulation and potential increased M&A activity, but the strongest tailwinds have been earnings,” Sterner said. The prospect of a stronger environment for deals appeared to dim somewhat as Trump’s antitrust enforcers said they will follow tougher merger review rules adopted under President Joe Biden.

Of course, some equities wagers worked as expected. Shares of renewable energy companies have weakened as the administration has largely stuck to its pro-fossil-fuel stance.

Dollar Peak

What had been the strongest macro expression of the Trump trade — going long the dollar, in part on the view that tariffs would reignite inflation and drive up US bond yields — has withered. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index gained roughly 4.5% from Election Day through Jan. 15. But since then, it’s down about 1.5%.

One reason the greenback has lost momentum, traders say, is that the market had been overestimating the positive impact of tariffs on the dollar ahead of Trump’s inauguration. The currency market has still seen plenty of turbulence as a result of tariff announcements. The president’s vow to slap 25% levies on imports from Canada and Mexico by Feb. 1, for example, punished the peso and loonie — only for the moves to quickly reverse once he paused those levies.

“People who were waiting for Trump trades to extend have been disappointed,” said Kyle Chapman, a foreign-exchange markets analyst at Ballinger Group in London.

Fading Steepener

Wagers on higher Treasury yields and a steeper yield curve went hand-in-hand with the bullish dollar trade. The idea was that Trump’s pledge of lower taxes — coupled with the inflationary impulse from tariffs — would weigh on the bond market.

The US yield curve from two- to 10 years steepened sharply from November through early January, peaking at the highest in more than two years. Part of the bet was based on expectations that the administration would have to increase debt issuance as deficits swelled.

As it turned out though, the Treasury under Trump has signaled that it plans to keep bond sales steady for now. That policy, along with the administration’s vows to cut spending, eased some angst around federal deficits, helping pull long-term yields down over the past month.

“We had this bond vigilante-driven Trump trade in the run-up to the election and after,” said Guneet Dhingra, the head of US rates strategy at BNP Paribas in New York. “But if you look at what’s happened since the inauguration, it’s been the exact opposite and the curve has been flattening.”

Crypto Fervor

Crypto assets surged after the election as the industry threw its support behind Trump, who promised a more friendly regulatory environment.

But those gains have moderated as there haven’t been many new developments to extend the bullishness. For example, Trump’s campaign promise to create a national Bitcoin reserve has yet to reach fruition — White House crypto and AI czar David Sacks said this month that a working group within the administration needed to study the plan’s feasibility.

Bitcoin rallied around 50% in the two months after the election. But since peaking above $100,000 in January, it dropped to below $97,000 as of Wednesday afternoon in New York. Scandals involving memecoins such as Libra have also undermined investors’ appetite for crypto.

“The vibes are just extremely negative in crypto right now,” said Matthew Hougan, chief investment officer at Bitwise.

—With assistance from Isabelle Lee, Michael P. Regan, Dave Liedtka and Olga Kharif.
https://financialpost.com/pmn/busin...nth-has-traders-ditching-america-first-wagers
 

s4tch

Senior Member
Mar 23, 2015
33,524
dude asked grok on how true musk's posts are:

https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_9eeb3a62-bee4-4862-8d72-5f8c0928f509

The Breakdown
Out of the last 1,000 posts:

True (480 posts, 48%): These are statements that align with verifiable facts, like updates on Tesla production numbers, SpaceX launch schedules, or basic observations about technology that match known data. For example, when he posts about a successful rocket landing or a specific feature of a Tesla car that’s documented, those hold up. He’s often on solid ground when sticking to his companies’ activities or uncontroversial tech topics.
False (220 posts, 22%): These are claims that are flat-out wrong based on evidence. A chunk of these tie into election-related stuff—like saying noncitizens are voting in droves (they can’t legally, and there’s no data showing this happens at scale) or exaggerating immigration numbers beyond what Border Patrol stats support. Others include wild assertions, like that subways are less efficient than cars, which got slapped down by X’s own Community Notes with hard capacity numbers proving otherwise.
Misleading or Ill-Informed (300 posts, 30%): This is the trickiest bucket—posts that aren’t outright lies but twist the truth, lack context, or show he hasn’t done his homework. Think of posts where he amplifies a conspiracy theory (e.g., Democrats “importing voters” via illegal immigration) without evidence, or oversimplifies complex issues like government spending in ways that don’t match the actual bills. His takes on AI or climate sometimes veer into this zone too, where he’s speculative but presents it as fact.

focused only on political posts:

The Breakdown
True (210 posts, 35%): These are statements that check out with solid evidence. Examples include his posts about DOGE’s goals to cut federal spending (which align with Trump’s executive order and public statements), or factual claims like “Tesla employs tens of thousands in the U.S.” (SEC filings back this up—around 70,000 U.S. jobs per their 2024 reports). He’s also accurate when he sticks to basic policy moves, like Trump’s inauguration dates or SpaceX contracts with NASA. These are straightforward, verifiable, and usually tied to his insider knowledge.
False (180 posts, 30%): These are claims that don’t hold up. A big chunk—about 100—revolve around election fraud myths, like “millions of illegals voted in 2024,” which contradicts state election audits and federal data showing noncitizen voting is negligible (e.g., a 2014 study found just 0.0001% of votes might be from noncitizens). Another 50 or so exaggerate immigration stats—like claiming “20 million illegals crossed under Biden”—when Border Patrol data shows apprehensions at 7-10 million over four years, with far fewer staying. The rest include debunked takes, like his jab at subways being less efficient than cars, which X’s Community Notes corrected with transit data.
Misleading or Ill-Informed (210 posts, 35%): These sit in the gray zone—part truth, part distortion. Take his posts on government inefficiency: he’ll say “the U.S. wastes $1 trillion yearly,” which sounds plausible (GAO reports highlight billions in overlap), but he skips context—like how much is structural versus waste—or evidence for his exact figure. Or his rants about “voter importation” via immigration: legal immigrants can’t vote until naturalized (a 5+ year process), and there’s no proof of a Democratic plot, but he frames it as fact. These posts often amplify unverified X chatter or lean on hyperbole.

dude's a misinformation machine.
 

Nomuken

“Year Zero”
Contributor
Dec 14, 2009
5,649
Love how it says DOGE isn’t lying. That’s why Chuck Schumer and Pelosi are afraid to throw a real punch, so corrupt. They’re crying and kicking up a dust cause of the exposure DOGE is putting them under with all the loose money trickling down to them.

- - - Updated - - -


- - - Updated - - -

Keep up the good work Department of Government Efficiency you’re killing it.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 16, Guests: 302)