First scenario: you are very poor, at a level we label 0. There's no social benefits. According to what you say, you have the incentive to do well.
Second scenario: you are very poor and you receive social benefits. So instead of a 0, you are a 5. According to what you say, you have NO incentive to go beyond 5. Why would you have gone beyond 5 in the first case then? Shouldn't you have stopped there if that's the maximum welfare level you are aiming for?
And what did it have to do with Obama?
As for the bold part, what Trump said about Obama's dividing the nation didn't remind me of you, what the guy who was filming shouted did.
What if it was because the white America wasn't able to stomach a black president for 8 years, which showed itself in their election of a clown such as Trump? Not a bright theory, but definitely less idiotic than what you say.
We have good black species and bad black species.
- - - Updated - - -
Clinton's disrespect for them in a number of personal contacts made them become Trump supporters? They probably were looking for an excuse. It was tough for most to admit that they were Trump supporters.
Good that you know a couple decent ones, I have yet to see one. Every encounter I had with a Trump supporter (in none of them I was directly involved thankfully) has been a nasty one in the past year, making me think that Trump has made it okay for a bunch of indecent people to act and behave indecently.
1)
Scenario one : you are poor and there is plenty of wage mobility to improve, you have to pull effort to get by
Scenario two : you are less poor, but you could obviously do alot better, you need to pull effort to improve, there is little of social benefit to leech on
Scenario three : you are less poor, but you have food stamps and several social benefit that allow you to just about break even. You can either have little effort and maintain your situation, or you can pull effort to improve it.
The result of scenario 3 is people beeing stuck where they are. partly a cultural thing, partly cause its set up in a way they become dependant on that welfare and food stamps now.
I dont know how the situation is in Iran, but Belgium is a prime example of this.
We did the same in the french part. Mines closed and the socialist party trew easy welfare for all, resulting in decades of very high unemployment fee and the average wealth tanking compared to the dutch part.
Today we are a shitcountry with insane welfare for all. The difference between a starting job and wellfare is low. Chose wellfare and you'll never improve. Chose the job and you have the chance to better yourself and improve.
This is why Sanders is a big bullet dodged.
2)
Obama had a great responsability. These people all voted him. Compare his speech to the vastly superior one of "retard W Bush". He let it all go by.
Kind is referring to hispanic, african american, white caucasian. If its a poor chose of words, then i do appologise.
3)
If a black republican runs president, the demmies will hate him, if its a black democrat, the reps will hate him.
Demmies contain a bit of loonies like the 3rd wave feminists, bernie people, anarchists and black racists
Reps contain a bit of loonies like the racist redneck segment, KKK. They got Libertatians tho
4)
No, you dont. You have different characters and ideologies. In Belgium we got De Winter and Mertens. One is a racist populist, the other is a radical communist. (I like neither)
Not sure why the personal insults on me are neccecary to be honst.
Buy on AliExpress.com
