Actual ideological differences and integrity, both with good ideas 
. Hopefully at least once in my lifetime.
. Hopefully at least once in my lifetime.
Buy on AliExpress.com
'Murica! (11 Viewers)
- Thread starter Fake Melo
- Start date
- Tags afl_italia's cousins forza trump smocking gun
Buy on AliExpress.com
I must say, she looks like she aged 10 years over the past week.
- - - Updated - - -
Steve Bannon, what an ugly muthafucka
http://www.theverge.com/2016/11/16/...esidency-chief-strategist-breitbart-tech-visa
- - - Updated - - -
Steve Bannon, what an ugly muthafucka
http://www.theverge.com/2016/11/16/...esidency-chief-strategist-breitbart-tech-visa
I get that. My point is individual states no longer need that much of a protection since their values are pretty much similar to the larger ones. The divide is within the states and between rural and urban areas. I see no point in protecting Texas as a whole for instance, with its 4 large urban epicenters and big Latino population
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Good summary.
By the way, I hope this bill passes. If these freaks want to wear diapers to protest Trump, then they need to buy the diapers themselves.
http://www.oregonlive.com/today/index.ssf/2016/11/iowas_suck_it_up_buttercup_bil.html
"Cry-ins"? No wonder why this country is a joke now.
- - - Updated - - -
ZoSo
Owned!
Lol. Poor Andy. But the irony
https://marketmonetarist.com/2016/11/20/stephen-bannon-nationalist-keynesian/
https://marketmonetarist.com/2016/11/20/stephen-bannon-nationalist-keynesian/
This article about identity politics is interesting.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/11/20/opinion/sunday/the-end-of-identity-liberalism.html?referer=
Especially this part:
"Finally, the whitelash thesis is convenient because it absolves liberals of not recognizing how their own obsession with diversity has encouraged white, rural, religious Americans to think of themselves as a disadvantaged group whose identity is being threatened or ignored. Such people are not actually reacting against the reality of our diverse America (they tend, after all, to live in homogeneous areas of the country). But they are reacting against the omnipresent rhetoric of identity, which is what they mean by “political correctness.” Liberals should bear in mind that the first identity movement in American politics was the Ku Klux Klan, which still exists. Those who play the identity game should be prepared to lose it.
We need a post-identity liberalism, and it should draw from the past successes of pre-identity liberalism. Such a liberalism would concentrate on widening its base by appealing to Americans as Americans and emphasizing the issues that affect a vast majority of them. It would speak to the nation as a nation of citizens who are in this together and must help one another. As for narrower issues that are highly charged symbolically and can drive potential allies away, especially those touching on sexuality and religion, such a liberalism would work quietly, sensitively and with a proper sense of scale. (To paraphrase Bernie Sanders, America is sick and tired of hearing about liberals’ damn bathrooms.)"
Skickat från min SM-G930F via Tapatalk
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/11/20/opinion/sunday/the-end-of-identity-liberalism.html?referer=
Especially this part:
"Finally, the whitelash thesis is convenient because it absolves liberals of not recognizing how their own obsession with diversity has encouraged white, rural, religious Americans to think of themselves as a disadvantaged group whose identity is being threatened or ignored. Such people are not actually reacting against the reality of our diverse America (they tend, after all, to live in homogeneous areas of the country). But they are reacting against the omnipresent rhetoric of identity, which is what they mean by “political correctness.” Liberals should bear in mind that the first identity movement in American politics was the Ku Klux Klan, which still exists. Those who play the identity game should be prepared to lose it.
We need a post-identity liberalism, and it should draw from the past successes of pre-identity liberalism. Such a liberalism would concentrate on widening its base by appealing to Americans as Americans and emphasizing the issues that affect a vast majority of them. It would speak to the nation as a nation of citizens who are in this together and must help one another. As for narrower issues that are highly charged symbolically and can drive potential allies away, especially those touching on sexuality and religion, such a liberalism would work quietly, sensitively and with a proper sense of scale. (To paraphrase Bernie Sanders, America is sick and tired of hearing about liberals’ damn bathrooms.)"
Skickat från min SM-G930F via Tapatalk
Jeff Sessions, what a tool. 
Trump was complaining that he's not beholden to donors, but in reality he's beholden to Sessions, Giuliani, Huckabee, Christie which is actually worse.
