He was good. But as I recall it he was at he's best in a period where Totti was injured and he played as a striker. But LW in a 4-3-3 or SS in a 4-4-2 would fit Vucinic equally good as longs as he has the freedom to move around and is not tactically bound by defensive duties that he would be as LM/LW in a 4-4-2.
He was good. But as I recall it he was at he's best in a period where Totti was injured and he played as a striker. But LW in a 4-3-3 or SS in a 4-4-2 would fit Vucinic equally good as longs as he has the freedom to move around and is not tactically bound by defensive duties that he would be as LM/LW in a 4-4-2.
common seriously? yes they are better, but we are in no position to rival other suitors, not financial nor in appeal, honestly speaking so far the money spent has been wise, and over all make a bigger difference in improvement than it would to solely buy one of those players.
Just remember what our objective is this season. - qualify for the CL, you can't seriously expect the likes of Aguero and Tevez to accept such plans if there are clubs prepared to offer more.
Its all about the results baby. If we suck next season too then he's off as far as I think. But if we get good results, then he's ok.
Also, don't act as if this team is quality now. Its been 3 transfer windows so far with Marotta and we still haven't seen him bring in that special player that this team so badly need. Signing Vucinic, Vidal and Licht doesn't make everything good all of a sudden.
Its all about the results baby. If we suck next season too then he's off as far as I think. But if we get good results, then he's ok.
Also, don't act as if this team is quality now. Its been 3 transfer windows so far with Marotta and we still haven't seen him bring in that special player that this team so badly need. Signing Vucinic, Vidal and Licht doesn't make everything good all of a sudden.