Miloš Krasić (10 Viewers)

Suns

Release clause?
May 22, 2009
22,086
I know. I completely disagree with him. He has had his fair shot of rest. There's no excuse to his dipshit form. He needs to pick it up ASAP.
Let's wait and see, and obviously hope for the best. Because the Krasic we had during the fall last season would be a key player.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
we should NOT absorb the crap inter/madrid mentality to kick out players that have a hard time, and could offer us so much.

yeah, melo had his mental against him, its discussabale


but krasic has much to offer, we should support him
 

Bianconero_Aus

Beppe Marotta Is My God
May 26, 2009
80,956
It's a valid point too, 2 years of non stop football would be extremely taxing both mentally and physically. Making little barbs about "ohh but he's well paid" is petty and stupid. Seriously, I hope Milos comes back and proves a lot of doubters wrong, because he is undeniably a good player with a lot to offer.
 
Aug 1, 2003
17,696
valid points but for some unfathomable reason I'm still on team Krasic and believes he will bounce back (to some degree.) he ought to do it quickly though, but even so it's useful to have him around - we've yet been tested with things such as serious injuries to our starting lineup etc (and hopefully that wont happen)
 

Lancelot

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2011
2,366
No doubt, he had a fair shot of rest. Nedved is just protecting him from the critics. You don`t expect him to say: "Ok, he is crap, we bought a crap player. WE are looking forward to release him ASAP". They are trying to encourage him to get back to his best.

Moggi used this technique in the past to defend his players from the criticism :D
 

Halabalu

Senior Member
Dec 5, 2011
1,081
We all have to plead that despite of all Milosh's good features, he is not a type of player who Juve demands, and who could doing well in such tactical approach which Conte prefers. I gues the most successful scheme at the moment is 4 3 3 but Krasich is typical right flang-running midfielder ( furthermore with not so original way of playing ). He could create a problems for the defenders only at first time after his arrival in Italy, but defenders become familiar with his tricks very soon. And now we have a situation in what Pepe looks quite confident as a right atacking midfielder, and Vuchinich who is more creative and original in his acting than Krasich.
I don't hate Milosh and realy appreciate what he has done last year, but I couldn't ignore the fact that he is not proper player for this Juventus.
 

frick

Senior Member
Apr 4, 2010
4,944
Let's wait until the season ends. I agree that the system doesn't favour him well as much as DN's last season but players can always improve his game if he works hard. Conte himself had already said that he'll try to help Krasic back to his old form.
 

Halabalu

Senior Member
Dec 5, 2011
1,081
yes I'm sure you felt the same way when he was single-handedly winning matches for us last year.
Last year we had another tactical scheme 4 4 2 which is more convenient for him in contrast to Pepe. And remember such games as clashes with Udineze and Napoli. Some tough left becks putting against him, and Krasich is out of game, and Juve had no other ways of building their atacks.
 

Ahmed

Principino
Sep 3, 2006
47,928
Last year we had another tactical scheme 4 4 2 which is more convenient for him in contrast to Pepe. And remember such games as clashes with Udineze and Napoli. Some tough left becks putting against him, and Krasich is out of game, and Juve had no other ways of building their atacks.
the 'system' talk is overstated.

now we have a world class RB, and a dynamic midfield.

I expect Milos to destroy the oppositions with our more fluid, attacking system of play.
 

frick

Senior Member
Apr 4, 2010
4,944
That's the problem, he's not accustomed to a more fluid, attacking system or at least as effective.
But that's not the only problem, otherwise Krasic won't have a dip in his form in the 2nd half of last season.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 9)