its a team game, and the rest of the players on the field had given up. i doubt camo could have "taken over" the game and spark any type of effort from the other 10 players on his team
It was 0-0 when he came on. A minute later they scored, we had 20 minutes to save a draw. Noone had given up. The team looked out of shape offensively all game yes, and it was indeed a difficult spot for Mauro to work his wonders. Maybe it was an unfortunate use of words on your part because I don't get why you would call those minutes "meaningless".
because our team was never in the game. now whether or not inter had alot to do with that is irrelevant because this is a rivalry and its also a points race. our team was better off not showing up than to run out whatever that was we had out there on saturday. as i've said numerous times in the match thread, we were lucky it wasn't worse.
camoranesi's appearance was fruitless in my eyes with the effort that was being exerted by the team before he came on. nothing changed on our approach or proficiency.
good to have mauro back, he had a decent game, did some really nice bits of skill and gave the zenit defence problems, brings some needed creativity back to the midfield
So, Camo had a good game or not? In the match thread people are dissing him. Now, bring me the truth will you! I only watched highlights (was working while game on) and as far as I could see he had some good set pieces and was involved in some of the chances.
I think he was our best midfielder, covering lots of ground. Very good in defence and started several attacks with his passing. Gave away some silly fouls but all in all he did well.
So, Camo had a good game or not? In the match thread people are dissing him. Now, bring me the truth will you! I only watched highlights (was working while game on) and as far as I could see he had some good set pieces and was involved in some of the chances.