Tbh Conte or at least someone like Conte is the only thing that will fix this team mentally, in the long term Conte is not the man. Is it too much to ask for a progressive manager I.e benfica's Roger Schmidt or someone German who's not call Tuchel
Now we go on and pretend to know that the only manager who can fix this team, happens to be the dude we had few seasons ago. What a coincidence. Come on now... There are PLENTY of coaches out there who can create JUST A SIMPLE football system and gameplan for our team.
There are no excuses for waiting for a particular coach to be available. ANY coach is better than this absolute disgusting piece of shit that we currently are being abused by.
- - - Updated - - -
Many have tried interpreting Allegri.
Some cited existing philosophical works such as Bordiga, Hegel and Plato.
The former saw Allegri as the progenitor of a spontaneous revolution, his football being so boring it had deep ideological significance. They viewed his football as the cry of discontentedness with the neoliberal consensus, and a legitimate philosophical work in it’s own right.
The modern Hegelians saw Allegrismo as the dialectical synthesis between two states of being, that of anguish and that of ennui.
Those using the works of Plato are conflicted on whether to see Allegriball as a concrete object, real and tangible, while all consider the feelings the games elicit to be abstract.
Others saw it as post-modern performance art and tried to categorise it as the intended catalyst of a yet to materialise Neo-Fluxus movement.
Alas, others even ascribed it a theological value, arguing for the canonisation of Allegri and compared our pain watching to the pain our lord felt on the cross. A contingent of these worshippers split recently and alleged Allegri was inherently heretical, no mortal man had ever suffered like Jesus did until we watched these season games.
The truth is, Allegriball defies what the human mind is capable of interpreting.
We can only bask in its majesty.
Some cited existing philosophical works such as Bordiga, Hegel and Plato.
The former saw Allegri as the progenitor of a spontaneous revolution, his football being so boring it had deep ideological significance. They viewed his football as the cry of discontentedness with the neoliberal consensus, and a legitimate philosophical work in it’s own right.
The modern Hegelians saw Allegrismo as the dialectical synthesis between two states of being, that of anguish and that of ennui.
Those using the works of Plato are conflicted on whether to see Allegriball as a concrete object, real and tangible, while all consider the feelings the games elicit to be abstract.
Others saw it as post-modern performance art and tried to categorise it as the intended catalyst of a yet to materialise Neo-Fluxus movement.
Alas, others even ascribed it a theological value, arguing for the canonisation of Allegri and compared our pain watching to the pain our lord felt on the cross. A contingent of these worshippers split recently and alleged Allegri was inherently heretical, no mortal man had ever suffered like Jesus did until we watched these season games.
The truth is, Allegriball defies what the human mind is capable of interpreting.
We can only bask in its majesty.
