out now?


  • Total voters
    166
  • Poll closed .

JuveE46

Senior Member
Dec 6, 2015
1,595
Man good win terrible defence.
Giving up 22 total shots? Now I get that
Of those 22 only 7 were on target 6 off target to our 10 total 5 on and 3 off which is still less but my main concern here is the shit that doesn't show up in the stats.
shots that never should be given up in the first place, after all you don't know if the shot you are giving up is going to be on target or off, so can't give shit up then came close a couple of times on those which would mean giving up points cheaply.
look at the highlights and space we give up where is the challenge on the ball half of the time we are watching even around our area what team am I watching? were we once known for this defence shit? Saved again at the last minute with this Russian roulette style football.
 
Last edited:
Mar 9, 2006
29,039
Man good win terrible defence.
Giving up 22 total shots? Now I get that
Of those 22 only 7 were on target 6 off target to our 10 total 5 on and 3 off which is still less but my main concern here is the shit that doesn't show up in the stats.
shots that never should be given up in the first place, after all you don't know if the shot you are giving up is going to be on target or off, so can't give shit up then came close a couple of times on those which would mean giving up points cheaply.
look at the highlights and space we give up where is the challenge on the ball half of the time we are watching even around our area what team am I watching? were we once known for this defence shit? Saved again at the last minute with this Russian roulette style football.
trust the process, trasition year, 2 cl finals etc.
 

JuveE46

Senior Member
Dec 6, 2015
1,595
22 shots in the box is a problem, if these are long shots then the defense have done well.
Done well for LA Galaxy level yes.
:53 seconds outside shot; dangerous
3:07-3:11 inexplicable ball watching just before conceding goal
7:11 standing around not applying pressure just before scrambling the ball, if that ball takes a lucky bounce they score..but that ball bounced to them for an outside shot (dangerous) at 7:17 instead..again why take such risks?
8:04 pass allowed inside with no challenge before it gets inside the area when that ball should be challenged way outside our area five seconds earlier..
Again not saying all of these were 100% avoidable but to not even challenge is a defective style of playing Max has adopted this term.

#AbsorbPressureInFrontOfOurGoaliesDick

 
Last edited:

Mike-e-y

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2004
11,188
No excuses. This team should win against sassuolo 9 times out of 10. Allegri and his coaching staff proably earns more money than Sassuolo's whole squad.
https://www.capology.com/club/sassuolo/salaries/
€25,540,000
annual payroll
So its Allegri + Dybala + his coaching staff.
Good stat. Clearly what you pay players in salary dictates whether you are a good team and whether we win a game or not. Such a shame we only paid Ramsey the 400k per week.

Next year we will win the CL by having a higher wage bill than City, Real and Liverpool combined
 

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
42,253
Good stat. Clearly what you pay players in salary dictates whether you are a good team and whether we win a game or not. Such a shame we only paid Ramsey the 400k per week.

Next year we will win the CL by having a higher wage bill than City, Real and Liverpool combined
We need to immediately give raises to all our players. It means we will win CL every year for the forseeable future. Imagine how great Rugani, Kean, Pellegrini, MdS, Bernadeschi, etc will be when we put them on 10 mil net/year :tuttosport:
 

JuveE46

Senior Member
Dec 6, 2015
1,595
Why the fuck Fagiot keeps playing left when we could play 343/352 and keep better shape? Is rabiot doing a better job than pellegrini would as WB? Is it the inability to play any other formation? No experimentation in training? #maxriddle
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 13, Guests: 513)