So the 3-5-2 formation is the exact problem. Not how we utilize the players in the system, what tactics/stategies the formation consist of and so on.
That's like claiming democracy is the problem if you disagree with your government. I can't believe people are this dogmatic when it comes to a formation - just change the formation and all of sudden things will be fine?
Last night the formation wasn't the biggest problem. Underperforming players, a weak attitude, no tactical answers to the Inter midfield/tactics (Pjanic moved to B2B and Lemina/Khedira at DM should have been tried), lack of clear leader in midfield/attack and so on; changing the formation or putting a specific player in the starting lineup would most likely not have changed this, the problems last night were much bigger. Obviously that is guess work, but as bad as we played last night, calling out the formation or starting Licht as a mean to solve the issues is just too simpleton'sk. Our 3-man midfield was outplayed and outhussled by Inter, how would starting Cuadrado have changed this? How would 4-3-3 have changed this?
The analytic apparatus of a 2nd grader strikes again.