Yeah I have to say though that in general I do believe that 352 isn’t the answer for European games. The teams you face in Europe are way more technical and attack minded than the average team in Italy, therefore we see that basic things such as constructing a decent attack become very difficult. It’s a miracle that Inter reached the final with that tactic, we’ve seen the same when Conte utilised it with us.
I’m 100% sure that with a decent coach and a 433 our coverage on the field would make a huge difference, being able to press higher instead of falling back to two heavily defensive lines and utilising the speed of Chiesa or Iling on the wings with a 433.
If we analyse yesterday, inviting a team to give dozens of crosses in a semi final in Europe honestly is asking for problems, even if we still had BBC as our back 3.
Its a true dinosaur formation. Outdated in every sense of the word
I think it's important to note that obviously football strategy is never as simple as '352' or '433' or '4231'- there are more important aspects to a team's style of play such as overarching approach or philosophy, individual player instructions, player roles, positional fluidity, lopsidedness etc. As such I don't see much sense in writing off a back 3 entirely when it comes to European campaigns. I see it more as both teams have 11 players and it's up to the coach to assemble a system out of the pieces he has.
I also think it always makes sense to start by identifying the best 11 players you have and build from there. We have CBs who began as fullbacks (Danilo, Alex Sandro), and that's something that can be used to make a fluid system which changes shape depending on the situation or phase of play, for example. The role that Mandzukic and Dani Alves had on opposite sides of the same team that is another example of a setup not being as simple as it would be represented by numbers or even with a graphic.
This wasn't a very well-written post, but what I'm tryna say is that I think it's possible to put together an exciting, dynamic, effective team with a back 3- but it depends on the context within which it's deployed. What we're doing now ain't it, clearly. Mazzari's Napoli is one example of a better one. If you upgrade some of the players- his back 3 with what we have now, Kostic for Zuñiga, a better player than Maggio on the right and some good CMs to play with Hamsik in the centre it would be a top team even in today's football imo. I think what I'm saying is we should find a system that works and allows us to play with a back 3 simply because those are our best players and a back 3 doesn't immediately nullify the rest of the team.
As an aside, a big part of why we're fucking up is that our squad doesn't fit any one particular formation. It's a mess, and any system we play necessarily has several players out of position. I suppose that technically even includes Danilo despite that working out well. We need to pick a system and arrange the squad to fit it. If we're really about to buy Pau Torres as a 4th first-choice CB then we truly are clueless.