Tough shit. One makes the midfield click, the other one offers ideas in the final third and also scores a lot. They don't play the same position so I won't bother comparing them.
I'd take them both
Tough shit. One makes the midfield click, the other one offers ideas in the final third and also scores a lot. They don't play the same position so I won't bother comparing them.
I'd take them both
I don't know what is there in that thread, but I know that Amauri simply flopped here. He actually is a good player and had his moments when he was a real beast. The guy simply failed when he finally made his big move, so hard luck both for him and us.
FFS, if you want me to pick one of them I can answer you, but I can't give you a better answer when you ask who's better. That's like comparing Tevez with Torres. Both are attackers, just like both Hamsik and Modric are midfielders, but they're still different kind of players, even though they share certain characteristics since they both play in attack.
On 2nd thought, I can't give you an answer even if you ask me to pick one. I like them both equally
I would, but I'd kill for Hamsik too.
I was his very first fanboy in this forum. Me and Dominic, iirc. Back in early 2007 when we were still in Serie B.
I would, but I'd kill for Hamsik too.
I was his very first fanboy in this forum. Me and Dominic, iirc. Back in early 2007 when we were still in Serie B.