Marco Verratti - CM - Pescara (18 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,984
We have the upper hand anyway, our foot is in the door with co-ownership. It's not as if Pescara are going to outbid us.

Co-ownerships work on the basis that a fee is agreed between two clubs, the player plays for one of the clubs (often the original club) for a period of 1-2 years. At the end of that the clubs negotiate the player. If they can't agree then it goes to blind auction.

I don't believe that Pescara can sell their 50% to another club without an agreement with Juventus, because it moves the goalposts of the co-ownership deal.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,502
Very rarely if ever have I seen a club sell their half of a player when their co-owning club wants that half (only when pretty much both are disinterested), so I didnt mean that scenario when I said annoying.

But simply the likely scenario that we should invest in him fully now instead of overpay later. Learn from Inter-like mistakes, not that this will likely be an Adriano like fiasco :D
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
Co-own. :sergio:

Gotta be frickin kidding me. Why not just buy him outright and loan him? Why make it so complicated?
 

Suns

Release clause?
May 22, 2009
22,090
I'm surprised that small teams don't ask for co-ownership of their young players more. Guys like Verratti are worth around 5 million now but in a year could be worth much, much more.
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
74,984
"Per Verratti avevamo una trattativa per lui con la Juventus, ora è scemata questa opportunità. In questo momento potrebbe andare al Milan, all'Inter. In realtà la più probabile delle chance è che rimanga a Pescara"
Whore ds. Basically saying 'give us more money'.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 18)