Forget about what everybody else said. My question is what new information has come to light regarding Mr. Choco since yesterday? Wasn’t your no lynch vote due to lack of information?
Buy on AliExpress.com
Mafia 2020 v2 || The FANATIC (21 Viewers)
- Thread starter piotrr
- Start date
Buy on AliExpress.com
These were the votes yesterday;
Mr Chocolate (8) - king Ale, Radekas, Quetz, ILFJ, Kyle, Klin, GordoDeCentral, ALC
king Ale (6) - Völler, , Mr Chocolate, Tomice, Osman, Fr3sh, campionesidd
Snobist (1) - , Ronn,
No Lynch (2) - Snobist, kappa96,
If Mr Chocolate is a G: There were 3 Gs yesterday. Lynching a G on the first day is a disaster for the Gs, so we have to assume that all of them had to vote for king Ale considering the votes were 8:6. They can't take the risk of spreading irrelevant votes and yesterday was very a great opportunity for the Gs to blend in with the rest based on that invisibility thingy. For me, this makes Snobist a C (a horrible one at that). Tomice was the one who mentioned Mr Chocolate's invisibility off first (but after Voller mentioned the same thing about king Ale). He would not have done that as another G himself. Voller was a C. That leaves Osman, Fr3sh (lol), and sidd as possible Gs.
If Mr Chocolate is a C: Then for the life of me, I can't understand why would @Tomice vote for king Ale after he initially brought up Mr Chocolate's invisibility off, when his reasoning was that king Ale did the same BUT BEFORE THE GAME STARTED which is less suspicious than what Choc did. That doesn't make sense to me. This is why I think lynching Chocolate today would give us a lot of answers.
Mr Chocolate (8) - king Ale, Radekas, Quetz, ILFJ, Kyle, Klin, GordoDeCentral, ALC
king Ale (6) - Völler, , Mr Chocolate, Tomice, Osman, Fr3sh, campionesidd
Snobist (1) - , Ronn,
No Lynch (2) - Snobist, kappa96,
If Mr Chocolate is a G: There were 3 Gs yesterday. Lynching a G on the first day is a disaster for the Gs, so we have to assume that all of them had to vote for king Ale considering the votes were 8:6. They can't take the risk of spreading irrelevant votes and yesterday was very a great opportunity for the Gs to blend in with the rest based on that invisibility thingy. For me, this makes Snobist a C (a horrible one at that). Tomice was the one who mentioned Mr Chocolate's invisibility off first (but after Voller mentioned the same thing about king Ale). He would not have done that as another G himself. Voller was a C. That leaves Osman, Fr3sh (lol), and sidd as possible Gs.
If Mr Chocolate is a C: Then for the life of me, I can't understand why would @Tomice vote for king Ale after he initially brought up Mr Chocolate's invisibility off, when his reasoning was that king Ale did the same BUT BEFORE THE GAME STARTED which is less suspicious than what Choc did. That doesn't make sense to me. This is why I think lynching Chocolate today would give us a lot of answers.
So we can agree that most likely scenario is Mr Choco being a C. As I said before, looking purely at the voting I find it hard to believe anyone tried to save him yesterday.
Why did I vote King Ale and not Mr Choco?
Those were the votes when I voted for Hoori
I think making an argument that a landslide voting on first day is probably the worst outcome for C's is pretty reasonable. We learn nothing, It's even worse then no-lynch.
So If I need to start getting votes on someone so we can have something to work with the next day what other choice do I have other then voting for Hoori? who I suspected more was irrelevant, not to mention that my gut feeling told me she was more a likely G the Mr. Choco, his response to my accusation didn't seem like a typical G.
Why did I vote King Ale and not Mr Choco?
Those were the votes when I voted for Hoori
I think making an argument that a landslide voting on first day is probably the worst outcome for C's is pretty reasonable. We learn nothing, It's even worse then no-lynch.
So If I need to start getting votes on someone so we can have something to work with the next day what other choice do I have other then voting for Hoori? who I suspected more was irrelevant, not to mention that my gut feeling told me she was more a likely G the Mr. Choco, his response to my accusation didn't seem like a typical G.
Last edited:
.
Ok, there are three possible scenarios here. Maybe even four.
1. Snobist is the BG
- Why did Matt claim to be the BG in this case? The less likely answer is that he's the D, who is trying to trick the Gs not to whack him. The more likely that he is a G. Now, why would the Gs take this risk this early in the game? Of course, Snobist with his refusal to go public and admit right away that he was the BG, makes it a perfect situation to add confusion early in the game and stop a possible cooperation between the BG and the D. Another possibility is that a G was investigated and now they're saving whatever can be saved, hoping to whack the D, or even hoping that the D will contact Matt, thinking that he is the real BG.
And why is Matt so easy on Snobist? I'd have confronted the lying mofo. Instead, Matt said that he is the BG and went to sleep. Then, after reading all the PMs and after making the plan, they went on with the story.
2. Matt is the BG (Snobist is a G)
- I can't explain why Snobist did what he did, but lets entertain the thought that there was an elaborate plan which also includes me and ALC.
One of me, Snobist and ALC was investigated and proven G. In order to prevent the D from saying it publicly, we made this BG plan and outted ourselves. Very naive if we did it, but a possibility. It still doesn't explain why did I say at least 5 times in this thread before I got jailed that Snobist is the BG.
Another possibility is that he is a G who tried to trick me into thinking that he was the BG, in which he succeeded, but I did tell everyone that he was the BG and he took a really unnecessary risk.
3. Matt is the BG (Snobist a normal civilian)
- Well, fuck it if this is the case. We just ban Snobist later.
4. Neither is the BG
- Let's kill ourselves.
1. Snobist is the BG
- Why did Matt claim to be the BG in this case? The less likely answer is that he's the D, who is trying to trick the Gs not to whack him. The more likely that he is a G. Now, why would the Gs take this risk this early in the game? Of course, Snobist with his refusal to go public and admit right away that he was the BG, makes it a perfect situation to add confusion early in the game and stop a possible cooperation between the BG and the D. Another possibility is that a G was investigated and now they're saving whatever can be saved, hoping to whack the D, or even hoping that the D will contact Matt, thinking that he is the real BG.
And why is Matt so easy on Snobist? I'd have confronted the lying mofo. Instead, Matt said that he is the BG and went to sleep. Then, after reading all the PMs and after making the plan, they went on with the story.
2. Matt is the BG (Snobist is a G)
- I can't explain why Snobist did what he did, but lets entertain the thought that there was an elaborate plan which also includes me and ALC.
One of me, Snobist and ALC was investigated and proven G. In order to prevent the D from saying it publicly, we made this BG plan and outted ourselves. Very naive if we did it, but a possibility. It still doesn't explain why did I say at least 5 times in this thread before I got jailed that Snobist is the BG.
Another possibility is that he is a G who tried to trick me into thinking that he was the BG, in which he succeeded, but I did tell everyone that he was the BG and he took a really unnecessary risk.
3. Matt is the BG (Snobist a normal civilian)
- Well, fuck it if this is the case. We just ban Snobist later.
4. Neither is the BG
- Let's kill ourselves.
