Mafia 2020 v2 || The FANATIC (21 Viewers)

[radekas]

You are way too good of a player to post this random shit Osman. You are on my list, currently number 2.

No lynching doesn't give us anything - it's as simple as that. There nothing to debate here. Saving one C doesn't help us in the greater plan, because what we need to do is learn something from every Cs death.

No lynching makes it freaking easy for the Gs to stay hidden. They don't have to vote for anyone, they can jump the bandwaggon and nobody will have any clue about any of them. Meanwhile they whack whoever they want. All while the Cs make a big steamy pile of shit in their "no-lynch" circle.

I really hope you are a G Osman. Hopefully the D will check you out soon.

And @kappa96 the D investing someone on day 1 doesn't really help us for a simple reason that the D can't and won't reveal himself unless he's in real danger (which can easily be a G trying to safe himself too btw). It's usual that the D stays quiet in the first days just to not bring attention of the Gs. Unless he investigates the BG he can't do much.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[kappa96]

How do you propose the Detective to give us some hints on who we should go for?

I guess he can't until the bodyguard doesn't reveal itself. There are greater chances that we lynch one of our one though obviously.
That we make us a man down and still at square one for tomorrow.
We would only see voting patterns ,but as you can see they are pretty spread out .
That why I advocate no lynch for today.
If you have other suggestions do share .
Mr. Chocolate and king Ale are the most obvious choices . I also suspect Allen ,but not enough to vote for him .

 

[ALC]

Just making sure I get all my posts in

- - - Updated - - -

Did you guys know that the Italian mafia is also the one at highest risk of heart disease and diabetes?

 

[Klin]

I guess he can't until the bodyguard doesn't reveal itself. There are greater chances that we lynch one of our one though obviously.
That we make us a man down and still at square one for tomorrow.
We would only see voting patterns ,but as you can see they are pretty spread out .
That why I advocate no lynch for today.
If you have other suggestions do share .
Mr. Chocolate and king Ale are the most obvious choices . I also suspect Allen ,but not enough to vote for him .

Losing a C today is almost a given. It's really difficult lynching a G on day 1 unless something reaaalllyyyy obvious and dramatic happened. That's why it's important to accuse people and get them to react. Their behaviour today might prove useful in the coming days. No lynch was useful last game (even then I was against it at first as a C but frigging Alen who was also a C luckily convinced us and the Gs ( I was then recruited) understood only later what a brave move that was for the Cs) because there were 5/6 players less than in this one.

- - - Updated - - -

ALC

 

[campionesidd]

Just making sure I get all my posts in

- - - Updated - - -

Did you guys know that the Italian mafia is also the one at highest risk of heart disease and diabetes?

Autolynch doesn’t start till day 2 iirc.
Interesting that you should say very little though......

 

[ALC]

Losing a C today is almost a given. It's really difficult lynching a G on day 1 unless something reaaalllyyyy obvious and dramatic happened. That's why it's important to accuse people and get them to react. Their behaviour today might prove useful in the coming days. No lynch was useful last game (even then I was against it at first as a C but frigging Alen who was also a C luckily convinced us and the Gs ( I was then recruited) understood only later what a brave move that was for the Cs) because there were 5/6 players less than in this one.

- - - Updated - - -

ALC

lol you stupid bastard

 

[Tomice]

Losing a C today is almost a given. It's really difficult lynching a G on day 1 unless something reaaalllyyyy obvious and dramatic happened. That's why it's important to accuse people and get them to react. Their behaviour today might prove useful in the coming days. No lynch was useful last game (even then I was against it at first as a C but frigging Alen who was also a C luckily convinced us and the Gs ( I was then recruited) understood only later what a brave move that was for the Cs) because there were 5/6 players less than in this one.

- - - Updated - - -

ALC

So what exactly are you accusing ALC of?

News to me that giving a meaningless vote to someone not in danger is suddenly a valid strategy for getting a reaction from someone

 

[ALC]

Autolynch doesn’t start till day 2 iirc.
Interesting that you should say very little though......

interesting that you should care...

 

[Klin]

lol you stupid bastard

So what exactly are you accusing ALC of?

News to me that giving a meaningless vote to someone not in danger is suddenly a valid strategy for getting a reaction from someone

Look at this motherfucker

It was obviously a joke because of the stupid post ALC had just posted. So far my vote is for someone between Mr Chocolate and kingAle.

 

[campionesidd]

interesting that you should care...

I try to keep an eye out on everyone.
Would be a lot easier if I was Beppe Marotta.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

For real though, Detective, whoever you are... investigate Mr. Chocolate. His move to turn on his invisibility, when he didn't do it in the last game, is a huge red flag. He must have been advised to do so by fellow Gs

 

[X Æ A-12]

it was the night where we all went with Kyles gut and voted ALC out, it was between him and Cerval who kyles gut feeling was, so we ordered to send a lynchin to one and i'd investigate the other, the invis was not mentioned once, Kyle can attest to that

Sorry bro but that's not totally true. While I didn't mention it to you, Matt pointing out Cerval's sudden invisibility was my initial reason for suspecting him

 

[Mr Chocolate]

Sorry bro but that's not totally true. While I didn't mention it to you, Matt pointing out Cerval's sudden invisibility was my initial reason for suspecting him

yeah thats what i mean, you never mentioned it to me, so it never crossed my personal line of thinking, even if it was the basis of your decision

 

[X Æ A-12]

yeah thats what i mean, you never mentioned it to me, so it never crossed my personal line of thinking, even if it was the basis of your decision

not the basis of it but i agree that is one of the better early leads.

 

[Tomice]

yeah thats what i mean, you never mentioned it to me, so it never crossed my personal line of thinking, even if it was the basis of your decision

The problem here is that you have 9 posts in the thread. 7 of those are about your invisibility.

Without those you would have only 2 posts in the thread, one is complete nosense post and the other is:

No-Lynch is not a good idea at all imo, its a large game, might aswell narrow it down, even if its me idc, thats one less c in the mix, plus we can learn from the discussions

Kappa96 for now, subject to change ofc

Why would you ever want that to happen if you know you're a C ?

So not a single posts with any insight or suspicion about anyone, beside votin Kappa without giving any reasoning

 

[Mr Chocolate]

The problem here is that you have 9 posts in the thread. 7 of those are about your invisibility.

Out of the 2 left one was complete nosense post and the other is:



Why would you ever want that to happen if you know you're a C ?

So not a single posts with any insight or suspicion about anyone, beside voting Kappa without giving any reasoning

no lynch is boring, it lynch just delays the game and we don't learn anything, ofc im a c, but at least it will encourage some discussion (This is not a invitiation to lynch me fellas).

If we are using the invis thing as a barometer of who to vote for, then King Ale literally the exact same thing, is a far more experienced player and is trying to deny it , i think a choice between us two is a no brainer on who to lynch

The Kappa vote was always subject to change, it was just what i was feeling at that moment, one of the strongest proponents of the no-lynch, saying we can investigate tommorow, but i don't see it feasable that the Inves will be able to share their findings by tommorow anyway

 

[campionesidd]

To be fair to Mr Choco, in my first mafia game, I was a noob C who changed his invisibility status and day one and duly got lynched.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

no lynch is boring, it lynch just delays the game and we don't learn anything, ofc im a c, but at least it will encourage some discussion (This is not a invitiation to lynch me fellas).

If we are using the invis thing as a barometer of who to vote for, then King Ale literally the exact same thing, is a far more experienced player and is trying to deny it , i think a choice between us two is a no brainer on who to lynch

King Ale turned hers off before the roles were given (supposedly). You turned yours off after, I was watching. It's a big difference. The only reason for you to do that is if you're a G or a special role.

But seeing as you were the D in the last game and didn't turn it off then, we can presume you were advised to do so this time.

 

[campionesidd]

Mr. Chocolate - king Ale, Radekas, Quetz
Snobist - Tomice, Ronn, campionesidd
No Lynch - Snobist, kappa96
king Ale - Völler
kappa96 - Mr Chocolate
Osman - ALC
ALC-Klin

Kyle, GordoDeCentral, Fr3sh, Osman and ILFJ are yet to vote.

--
Alen is in jail and his vote does not count.

 

[Tomice]

To be fair to Mr Choco, in my first mafia game, I was a noob C who changed his invisibility status and day one and duly got lynched.

A valid argument, it does usually ends in lynching a C, but more then once it was a first time G.

Happened to me aswell in my first game as a G.

Against him is also the fact he was a D last game and investigated a guy suspected of doing the same.

With that said King Ale is not off the hook for the same thing, my gut is telling me she's lieing about the timing of changing her status