Luigi "Vergogna" Delneri (51 Viewers)
- Thread starter Mark
- Start date
Luigi Del Neri Not Impressed With Juventus' Performance Despite Win Over Sturm Graz
The coach saw some things he did not like...
Juventus coach Luigi Del Neri was not impressed with his side's performance against Sturm Graz despite the Bianconeri winning 2-1 in the first leg of their Europa League play-off.
The boss says the team has not forgotten about last season's errors, which contributed to the side conceding a goal this evening.
"I suffered a lot, as we did not do what we needed to," Del Neri said after the match to TuttoSport. "We also do not need to be scared when we concede a goal.
"We paid the ultimate price and conceded a goal due to our psychological problems, but we must forget about last season and move forward without thinking about the demons that haunted us.
"We can do much, much better. This does not sit well with me compared to how my teams normally play," concluded the coach.
The coach saw some things he did not like...
Juventus coach Luigi Del Neri was not impressed with his side's performance against Sturm Graz despite the Bianconeri winning 2-1 in the first leg of their Europa League play-off.
The boss says the team has not forgotten about last season's errors, which contributed to the side conceding a goal this evening.
"I suffered a lot, as we did not do what we needed to," Del Neri said after the match to TuttoSport. "We also do not need to be scared when we concede a goal.
"We paid the ultimate price and conceded a goal due to our psychological problems, but we must forget about last season and move forward without thinking about the demons that haunted us.
"We can do much, much better. This does not sit well with me compared to how my teams normally play," concluded the coach.
Yeah ofcourse Vialli did, because he stripped his suit off and had to get he job done himself. I dont care what Chelsea achieved earlier, I'm talking about his era and how he improved he team. So bringing in Lampard and Czech is considered nothing today? They are the reason Chelsea are capable of winning today. Trust me the Africans arnt the ones doing the thinking With All due respect.
Explain to me last year with Roma? from 9th spot with a bad atmosphere in their club as we all knew and a recently dead president, how did he manage to finish second and almost win the scudetto? I don't care if Roma have history, stick to the question please.
Explain to me last year with Roma? from 9th spot with a bad atmosphere in their club as we all knew and a recently dead president, how did he manage to finish second and almost win the scudetto? I don't care if Roma have history, stick to the question please.
I sincerely want an explanation on how Cech does the thinking for Chelsea.
Lampard i already said that it was the best thing he did.
Mind you, when Rainieri bought Cech he did it as a backup,and when he joined the team Rainieri was no longer there. Mourinho gave him his first team chance, not Claudio.
So he build a team with two signings? wow, i guess Jose's signings: Essien, Carvalho, Malouda, Drogba, Robben, Ashley Cole, Ballack, Kalou and Mikel didn't have an impact at all, right?
Barring Robben and Ballack all of them are in today's Chelsea squad.
Lampard i already said that it was the best thing he did.
Mind you, when Rainieri bought Cech he did it as a backup,and when he joined the team Rainieri was no longer there. Mourinho gave him his first team chance, not Claudio.
So he build a team with two signings? wow, i guess Jose's signings: Essien, Carvalho, Malouda, Drogba, Robben, Ashley Cole, Ballack, Kalou and Mikel didn't have an impact at all, right?
Barring Robben and Ballack all of them are in today's Chelsea squad.
I'm not talking about history my friend, I'm talking about how effective he is during his own era and how he boosts the team up to compete, I also mentioned he isn't a winner. Today's chelsea has jose's additions of physical players who are very strong,but it's still lampard Terry and Czech who are key players.
He proved himself with Roma last year and Juventus(2007).
He proved himself with Roma last year and Juventus(2007).
I sincerely want an explanation on how Cech does the thinking for Chelsea.
Lampard i already said that it was the best thing he did.
Mind you, when Rainieri bought Cech he did it as a backup,and when he joined the team Rainieri was no longer there. Mourinho gave him his first team chance, not Claudio.
So he build a team with two signings? wow, i guess Jose's signings: Essien, Carvalho, Malouda, Drogba, Robben, Ashley Cole, Ballack, Kalou and Mikel didn't have an impact at all, right?
Barring Robben and Ballack all of them are in today's Chelsea squad.
Lampard i already said that it was the best thing he did.
Mind you, when Rainieri bought Cech he did it as a backup,and when he joined the team Rainieri was no longer there. Mourinho gave him his first team chance, not Claudio.
So he build a team with two signings? wow, i guess Jose's signings: Essien, Carvalho, Malouda, Drogba, Robben, Ashley Cole, Ballack, Kalou and Mikel didn't have an impact at all, right?
Barring Robben and Ballack all of them are in today's Chelsea squad.
When I say build, I don't only mean transfers and signings, it's also how he works with them when they're in bad form etc etc.
What about Roma last year? Was that spaletti? Or maybe Rosella?
If you think being runner up is somehow "effective" i guess that yes, he proved it.
the guy is a perennial runner up.
Lampard, Terry and Cech (not Czech, that's his nationality) are indeed key players but so are Essien (no, he's not brainless unlike sissoko), Drogba, Ashley Cole, and so was Carvalho (if it wasn't for him Terry wouldn't be what he is now).
Rainieri did 2 signings (Terry came from the academy), just two. And he didn't got to use Cech once, Mourinho did 9 signings. Who's got the bigger influence?
And no i don't think goalkeeping is just jumping, i play as a goalkeeper myself but you should've said it better, you implied that Lampard and Cech did all the thinking.
the guy is a perennial runner up.
Lampard, Terry and Cech (not Czech, that's his nationality) are indeed key players but so are Essien (no, he's not brainless unlike sissoko), Drogba, Ashley Cole, and so was Carvalho (if it wasn't for him Terry wouldn't be what he is now).
Rainieri did 2 signings (Terry came from the academy), just two. And he didn't got to use Cech once, Mourinho did 9 signings. Who's got the bigger influence?
And no i don't think goalkeeping is just jumping, i play as a goalkeeper myself but you should've said it better, you implied that Lampard and Cech did all the thinking.
BULLSHIT.
John Terry was there since 1998, playing in the youth academy since 1995. Vialli was the one who gave him his first chance. So therefore, this is like saying Ranieri developed Marchisio when it was Deschamps who gave him the time of day in Serie B.
The only fact that Ranieri has proven is that he could take a Roma side in the weakest Serie A since the 90's to second place. That is it. Period, paragraph.
You have absolutely nothing besides the Lampard signing. He was not developed by Ranieri either, ooooooooooohhh.
John Terry was there since 1998, playing in the youth academy since 1995. Vialli was the one who gave him his first chance. So therefore, this is like saying Ranieri developed Marchisio when it was Deschamps who gave him the time of day in Serie B.
The only fact that Ranieri has proven is that he could take a Roma side in the weakest Serie A since the 90's to second place. That is it. Period, paragraph.
You have absolutely nothing besides the Lampard signing. He was not developed by Ranieri either, ooooooooooohhh.
Thank you!
Exactly my point
Exactly my point
You also said that he should have stayed on at Juventus when he clearly couldn't have. He had lost the respect of the dressing room and the management, he had to go.
) last year though, just not him.
Would also have been good this year instead of DN.