Kluivert vs. Trezeguet (1 Viewer)

[Trezeguet_FC]

Which one do you think would suite juve more??

I think trez has adapted to italian football, but in general, i think kluivert is better, but then again when you look at kluiverts record in italy, it is awful and i dont think it would be easy for him to adapt to italian football, he had enough trouble with milan.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[CV_32]

i thing that kluivert will be better than trez
treze dont have any dribble or stronge body
i prefer kluivert

 

[Dj Juve]

both are diferent players...kluivert is the kinda guy that i hate, and Trez is the kinda guy that i dont mind...

 

[Majed]

overall, Kluivert is more complete. but i think Trez Suits juve pretty well because we have DP and Neddy to provide. we also have Camo who plays wide. + he has already proved himself with juve.

BTW, i'm not suggesting that Kluivert couldn't make it with juve. you can't really judge a player from his performance with another league team.
Davids is a good example. he hasn't played well with Milan, yet he has done well with juve.

 

[Dj Juve]

and he dutch as well....hmmm...

 

[Majed]

++ [ originally posted by Weed Alien ] ++
and he dutch as well....hmmm...

yeah, i told you Davids was a good example ....and dont be thinking that i'm implying that Kluivert should move to juve

 

[Dj Juve]

y not? he played badly for milan, so he's sure to suceed here like davids rite?

 

[Tom]

anyone who thinks trez needs brain surgery

 

[Adrian]

of course Tom, we all know you have a fetish for kluivert.

you know what i love about kluivert.......he seems to score so much more than trezeguet

seriously, kluivert at juve would be a waste. TRez is what we need.....a striker who finsihes and can score 25 plus goals a season. kluivert doesnt do that.

shouldnt really comapre actually, they are different types of strikers.

if i had to replace trez at juve, only Adriano would be the man for me.

 

[Tom]

++ [ originally posted by Adrian ] ++
of course Tom, we all know you have a fetish for kluivert.

:flirt:

 

[Majed]

++ [ originally posted by Weed Alien ] ++
y not? he played badly for milan, so he's sure to suceed here like davids rite?

could this also suggest that juve should sell their best players to Milan to ruin their team

 

[Slagathor]

Mark my words: No Dutch striker can ever succeed in Serie A so there's only one answer possible here; Trezeguet!

 

[Tom]

I bet van nistelrooy could

 

[Slagathor]

No, he couldn't.

Get back to you with an explanation - gotta go now.

 

[Tom]

ok but I really don't see how he would fail..looking forward to your explanation !

 

[Trezeguet_FC]

after todays game i prefer trez, he is a very flexiible player and that was a key factor to our win. the confidence that his goal put in juve is what made us win!

 

[gray]

Trez is more consistent IMO, and he's better at shooting on the turn.

Speed: Both not that fast (I think?)
Dribbling: Kluivert
Headers: Kluivert
Finishing: Trezeguet
Passing: Both don't really pass
Crossing: As above
Strength: Kluivert
Consistency: Trezeguet
Selfishness: Trez is slightly less selfish

 

[Slagathor]

++ [ originally posted by Paolo_Montero ] ++
ok but I really don't see how he would fail..looking forward to your explanation !

In Holland, strikers grow up in luxury. It's OK if you miss a couple of chances because there will be about a dozen more.
Defences are weak and the entire team comes up behind you for support when in ball posession and on the attack.

In Italy, you may only get one or two shots and you have to score at least one goal. This is where most Dutch strikers fail. If you watch a couple of matches with players such as Kluivert, you'll see that they need more chances to score than players like Trezeguet or Vieri.

I believe this is the reason that Kluivert has failed before in Serie A and would fail again. With the few exceptions to confirm the rule, most Dutch strikers and forwards could never and still can't make it in Italy.

This reason is also part of the goal-scoring problem with the Dutch NT but that's another topic.

 

[Stu]

Kluivert is IMO the more complete player. His dribbling is definetely better than Trezeguet's, he's better in the air and stronger too, but for Juve I prefer Trez. We don't really need Kluivert's skills because we have DP, Neddy, Camo, Zambro and Davids for that, and Trez is the better finisher. Apart from this, I think that the most important thing is that Kluivert failed in Italy with Milan whereas Trez has proved himself in Italy and flourished beautifully last season.

 

[Dj Juve]

well said stuart little
but seriously, well said stuart :thumb: