the reason it should have been a penalty is that had marchisio not been tripped he could have possibly gotten to his own flick before it went out. the ref should know that already
I don't think we will finish the match with 11 players, we are reckless and shaky. We are trolling them so much but we need another goal to complete the trolling.
Btw, this is my #1 concern of the match right now. I think if we finish with 11 players, we should get at least a point out of this match. But there's a good likelihood of finishing less than 11 and, hence, zero points as a result.
Now that's what i call finish your chances!!
They're in control of the match,but still we lead it 2-1,and could have and should have did 3-1 with the penalty not given.it was 100% penalty no doubts.
it is a good rule, because if it wasn't for this rule you could try to shoot on goal in one-on-one situations and if you see you miss you just run into the keeper to get a penalty
obviously the ref would have to use discretion, and I do understand why the rule exists, but for certain situations, like in todays game, it would have been fair to have a penalty, since without the keeper taking our player out, we probably would have scored