Juventuz LIVE matches 2011/2012 (30 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

deggen10

Senior Member
Jul 27, 2011
1,182
They're daring us to put them away. It's a good tactic considering our finishing. Matri really needs to get to that next level where he can put 2-3 goals away in quick succession like a Higuain. He's good enough, it's just a mental thing.

If we don't score, then every team is going to start pressing us high.
 

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
89,026
The goalkeeper made no attempt to play the ball...
anyways, he was passing the ball to Matri... just that his first touch let him down and his pass looked like a shot because he didn't catch it well...
I think he fell later. Dunno, it looked like anything but a penalty to me.

Marchisio and Matri are both doing great. Vidal is also very useful.

Lich's miss was disappointing, he was terrible there.
 
OP
Azzurri7

Azzurri7

Pinturicchio
Moderator
Dec 16, 2003
72,692
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #8,112
    C'mon guys, that was not a penalty. Marchisio took a shot and then fell on the ground. Ball moved, that can't be a penalty. I think it was a right call.
    Whaaaaat? He didn't go for any ball man, he tackled him with both legs no matter if he shot the ball or not.
     

    king Ale

    Senior Member
    Oct 28, 2004
    21,689
    if he stayd up, then he could have controlled it and put it back it

    it only counts as a shot, if he cant recapture it


    it was a penalty
    Even if he had zero chance of controlling the ball, it must have been still a penalty because it was a FOUL play. Even if there was no ball involved, it must have been a penalty again.
     

    acmilan

    Plusvalenza Akbar
    Nov 8, 2005
    10,722
    Seriously how wasn't that a penalty? I don't understand..
    had marchisio chipped the ball aside as to make it look like he is continuing the attacking play, it would have been a PK, no doubt. The way he played it however, it could be interpreted as a final shot on goal - thus putting and end to the attacking play - and in that case not giving the PK was the correct decision.

    btw, the ref is hated by Inter fans and already has the bad rep among them, so I wouldn't go as far as seeing the no PK call as punishing intentionally Juve, it was simply a way more of a 50-50 situation than it looked for the reasons explained above.
     

    CORVETTE

    Malato di Juve , , 29
    Oct 13, 2005
    2,935
    Fucking ladri , that should have been a PK and a red card for their scumbag goalkeeper , fucking ladri , and they are putting we don't robe blablabla banner .

    I am so fucking mad , we should be leading by a margin .
     

    Henry

    Senior Member
    Sep 30, 2003
    5,517
    They've definitely played better than we have, but we should be winning by a greater margin, we keep creating opportunities, i hope all those close misses don't bite us in the ass. Pirlo takes a lot of time on the ball, but his passing really is crucial. Vidal doesn't look completely up to speed, and Vucinic has been lazy; you HAVE to work hard and close down players in a match like this, I don't care what your position is
     

    v1rtu4l

    Senior Member
    Mar 4, 2008
    6,349
    cmon

    whats the rule about this, he kicks over marchi while the ball is in play

    penalty and red
    the rule is, that it first off must prevent a goal scoring opportunity to get a red card... since marchisios shot was before the contact the goal scoring chance was already over (with marchisio missing the goal) when the contact was made and it is indeed arguable... not a clear penalty ... if marchisio would just have put the ball out of the range of the keeper then the contact would have been a red but not like this... marchisio just could have been smarter there instead of trying a fancy outside of the foot lob there

    of course i can understand that you can't fathom that rule interpretation with bianconeri goggles on
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 29)