Juventuz LIVE 2007/2008 (52 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mike-e-y

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2004
11,188
How the heck can anyone think it was offside?
it was not offside..
Nope, the second replay was better, he was onside.
there was only 1 player infront of trez as the keeper was out, it was offside trust me, there has 2 be 2 players between the attacker and the goal, if the keeper was on the lie it would have been onside but because the keeper was out then the player between trez and the goal takes the 'keeper' status, there was only 1 person in front of trez
 

cunninlynguists

Amsterdam Ambassador
May 7, 2006
3,249
there was only 1 player infront of trez as the keeper was out, it was offside trust me, there has 2 be 2 players between the attacker and the goal, if the keeper was on the lie it would have been onside but because the keeper was out then the player between trez and the goal takes the 'keeper' status, there was only 1 person in front of trez
I think that the refs know it better...
Nobody even appealed for offside
 

attila_huno

Junior Member
Dec 18, 2007
205
there was only 1 player infront of trez as the keeper was out, it was offside trust me, there has 2 be 2 players between the attacker and the goal, if the keeper was on the lie it would have been onside but because the keeper was out then the player between trez and the goal takes the 'keeper' status, there was only 1 person in front of trez
if that's true then, how come only one player can fuck up the offside trap.

well now i realize the keeper must be there too
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
54,000
there was only 1 player infront of trez as the keeper was out, it was offside trust me, there has 2 be 2 players between the attacker and the goal, if the keeper was on the lie it would have been onside but because the keeper was out then the player between trez and the goal takes the 'keeper' status, there was only 1 person in front of trez
This simply can NOT be the rule.
 

V

Senior Member
Jun 8, 2005
20,110
  • V

    V

there was only 1 player infront of trez as the keeper was out, it was offside trust me, there has 2 be 2 players between the attacker and the goal, if the keeper was on the lie it would have been onside but because the keeper was out then the player between trez and the goal takes the 'keeper' status, there was only 1 person in front of trez
I've never heard of such a rule. Google fifa rule book and search if you want. I think you're way off as that doesn't make sense really.
 

mondo1

Senior Member
May 14, 2006
11,455
there was only 1 player infront of trez as the keeper was out, it was offside trust me, there has 2 be 2 players between the attacker and the goal, if the keeper was on the lie it would have been onside but because the keeper was out then the player between trez and the goal takes the 'keeper' status, there was only 1 person in front of trez
ya i think ur right the offside has to do with the goali on that one..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 52)