Of course he’s a problem defensively. He’s a midfielder and he is always out of position and offers nothing at that end of the pitch. He’s not our CF. His attacking play can be very good, but given that he’s ostensibly a CM he can’t offer a big fat zero in our own half.
We are not going to be great defensively with 3 strikers. The problem is the strikers missed their chances, otherwise the game would be going as planned.
Our right side is disastrous defensively. McKennie is rarely there and Danilo can't do it alone (plus he's too slow for Boga). If we make a sub on that side, then Cuadrado for McKennie, but the American was probably our best attacking player, so I'm not sure what to do.
I do like him but if Max uses someone else than him I am fine with it. I just want to win with whoever. I see lots of comments that also "think" like you.
Of course he’s a problem defensively. He’s a midfielder and he is always out of position and offers nothing at that end of the pitch. He’s not our CF. His attacking play can be very good, but given that he’s ostensibly a CM he can’t offer a big fat zero in our own half.
Of course he’s a problem defensively. He’s a midfielder and he is always out of position and offers nothing at that end of the pitch. He’s not our CF. His attacking play can be very good, but given that he’s ostensibly a CM he can’t offer a big fat zero in our own half.
We are not going to be great defensively with 3 strikers. The problem is the strikers missed their chances, otherwise the game would be going as planned.
We are not going to be great defensively with 3 strikers. The problem is the strikers missed their chances, otherwise the game would be going as planned.
Would you agree that Mckennie’s lack of defensive prowess is kind of a problem when we are already playing with 3 strikers. Take off Dybala or Morata and Mckennie is a better fit, but with all three on, he’s a big liability imo
