Juvefreak Senior Member Jul 25, 2004 #41 Aug 25, 2002 917 Jul 25, 2004 #41 Juvefreak Jul 25, 2004 ++ [ originally posted by Valley ] ++ Why do we even need to spend money on Jank? We have Zamb at left back, would we play Jank at left midfield then? Click to expand... Because Zambro could then play in midfield, where can play even better... Buy on AliExpress.com
++ [ originally posted by Valley ] ++ Why do we even need to spend money on Jank? We have Zamb at left back, would we play Jank at left midfield then? Click to expand... Because Zambro could then play in midfield, where can play even better... Buy on AliExpress.com
gray Senior Member Moderator Jul 26, 2004 #42 Apr 22, 2003 30,260 Jul 26, 2004 #42 gray Jul 26, 2004 Exactly
Mike-e-y Senior Member Jul 26, 2004 #43 Jul 18, 2004 11,188 Jul 26, 2004 #43 Mike-e-y Jul 26, 2004 but we r not going to use zamb as a midfielder Capello said himself, Jank would be used in the midfield
but we r not going to use zamb as a midfielder Capello said himself, Jank would be used in the midfield
