Juan Guillermo Cuadrado - RWB/RM/LM - Chelsea (12 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
Why not? We did ok good using lowly pereyra and Vidal as AM. And all our performances improved when we switched from 352 to 4312.

Now we have more players to try , even withotu an AM. I see no point in making 352 our staple again.
I've said it so many times. You need one player in the final third that comes into the ball and can keep it. Tevez did a great job, vidal could also do that.


With pereyra, dybala and morata, we dont. They have other playstyles. As long as dont get an AM that can keep the ball like Tevez could, we'll continue with 3-5-2 in games we want to domminate

- - - Updated - - -

Hyperbolic as you usually are.

The 4-3-1-2 would win us tons of Serie A matches with our current personnel. Might not always be pretty, but Dybala or Pereyra or even Pogba could play as TQ.
Dybala would be limited in such role, pereyra can do it if we have an ss that can keep the ball(tevez) wich we lack, and Pogba would be hugely limited as a tq

so no
 

Fellas

Farsopoli
Jun 13, 2005
3,136
Cuadrado and Witsel and lets use 4-3-2-1 and 3-5-2 this season. Seems hard to get that trequartista so. Maby next year...

3-5-2

Cuadrado Witsel CM8 Pogba Alex sandro


Or 4-3-2-1

Two of Morata,dybala,cuadrado,Pereyra, coman behind Mandzukic or Morata( can play behind as one of the Two also)


Witsel 28 million euros , Cuadrado loan
 

Juvellino

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2015
7,146
I rate Cuadrado but we should only get him if we will play a lot of 4-3-3. I think Draxler is a better choice because he can play AM and LW. That versatility. But if we could get Cuadrado on loan it can't hurt.
 

Suns

Release clause?
May 22, 2009
22,090
how are we suppose to the win champions league if we keep signing our biggest opponents trash?

if they give him to us on a free loan with good option to buy next year then yes, if not then keep him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 12)