I'd choose Hazard instead too, but not based on quality (in that department both would be great). Hazard at least would make us less tactical dependents and atm he also seems more consistent. Even though he's the younger.
I think it depends on how much they decide to invest on transfers, if we're talking over 100 mil..we'll probably be able to sign him, 2 good wing backs and another 2/3 players, we shouldnt spend most of our money on him though..