Jadon Sancho - RW/LW - Manchester United (8 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

DanielSz

Senior Member
Sep 6, 2014
14,546
#62
I like sancho a lot, players always get worse at man u. He was good at dortmund even this season. He plays both flanks, and Motta values versatility. If they can afford it they should do it imo
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,591
#65
He is a very good player. But he is a huge red flag attitude and focus wise.


But since it's a loan, I'm not sure that matters for us. If they see him Like a temporary solution or gamble to reignite a previous top winger.



It's a league where Lookman is performing like a top player in, so decent chance for Sancho to do damage.
 

Alin

FINO ALLA FINE!
Jul 27, 2015
6,468
#68
He is a very good player. But he is a huge red flag attitude and focus wise.


But since it's a loan, I'm not sure that matters for us. If they see him Like a temporary solution or gamble to reignite a previous top winger.



It's a league where Lookman is performing like a top player in, so decent chance for Sancho to do damage.
Inconsistent is the best word to describe him, but could easily see him doing well here if it gets to it, i’d probably avoid a permanent deal given UTD’s high asking price and Sancho’s absurd wage demands but i think an initial loan to test things out surely wouldn’t hurt anyone.
 

Orgut

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2002
19,406
#70
loan with obligation to return
Honestly I would skip the loan part. Too much dribbling with too less of end product - I dont like these kind of players.
I`d skip on mr only speed as well. Seems like a waste of money.

- - - Updated - - -

From Greenwood to Sancho, it's like going from bitter poison to sweet poison. At least it'll taste better!
In terms of end product Greenwood is better IMO but I dont want us to sign rapists.
 

Robee

Senior Member
Jun 21, 2011
7,118
#72
1. Wages for one
2.Attitude and his lack of professionalism or so he's accused of by man utd.
3. I don't think he's that good, lacks consistency. Purely on a footballing level Greenwood is superior.
In January the deal was made where Man U would've paid a part of his wages...
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
75,264
#76
Douglas Costa is a good comparison for this guy. DC more amiable. Sancho maybe better end product, but I could see a similar kind of output for both in Serie A. Flip side is he's an absolute star, you just don't know.

He obviously has loads of talent but he's an archetype modern footballer.
 

Orgut

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2002
19,406
#77
That depends obviously. But he'd be our best winger by a mile immediately.
Rather bring back Soule than even try this non Brazilian Lolzillian. I really dont like these kind of players who are so good at dribbling that this is actually all they do.
Now if you dribble past an opponent and then lose the ball with a terrible pass or a terrible decision what do you get from it?! Nada.
Rather we give a young talent like Soule a chance than try Sancho.

- - - Updated - - -

Douglas Costa is a good comparison for this guy. DC more amiable. Sancho maybe better end product, but I could see a similar kind of output for both in Serie A. Flip side is he's an absolute star, you just don't know.

He obviously has loads of talent but he's an archetype modern footballer.
Actually I rate D.Costa way more than this bozo. This guy is all hype.
 

Robee

Senior Member
Jun 21, 2011
7,118
#79
Rather bring back Soule than even try this non Brazilian Lolzillian. I really dont like these kind of players who are so good at dribbling that this is actually all they do.
Now if you dribble past an opponent and then lose the ball with a terrible pass or a terrible decision what do you get from it?! Nada.
Rather we give a young talent like Soule a chance than try Sancho.

- - - Updated - - -


Actually I rate D.Costa way more than this bozo. This guy is all hype.
He had multiple seasons with over 20 G+A. That's not nada. So I'm not quite sure what you're saying.

Also, we need much more than Soulé alone...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 6)