J Stadium/Allianz (12 Viewers)

JuventinMalti

Senior Member
Apr 5, 2006
575
a 35-40k seat stadium is considered tiny in books...
you guys have embraced mediocrity in all sectors far too easily, good luck finding a ticket for a good place in title decider or CL semi.
The less seats there, the more exp they will be and the less chances to find a decent we have.

But i guess the new board has decided that wont play a little decider match or a CL semi ever again...

As for the third star it will only happen after Agnelii sell us and a new influent owner buys us.
Not to intrude or anything but Cronios is right...Look at what happened to Revive's friend, he was asked for 200 euros, and it wasn't even a match day!! :D
 

Marc

Softcore Juventino
Jul 14, 2006
21,649
a 35-40k seat stadium is considered tiny in books...
you guys have embraced mediocrity in all sectors far too easily, good luck finding a ticket for a good place in title decider or CL semi.
The less seats there, the more exp they will be and the less chances to find a decent we have.

But i guess the new board has decided that wont play a little decider match or a CL semi ever again...

As for the third star it will only happen after Agnelii sell us and a new influent owner buys us.
Dude, this is the best stadium in Italy. And it can be expanded.
 

KB824

Senior Member
Sep 16, 2003
31,680
Still not enough, anything less than Camp Nou is insignificant.
Jack, you know that there cannot be another football stadium in the world that is allowed to exceed the greatness of Camp Nou.


It's written into all of the architectural contracts.


It can never happen.


the effect has even seeped into U.S. Stadiums.


The Dallas Cowboys wanted to have a HD Scoreboard even bigger than the one they have know, until Guardiola sent them a cease and decist letter.


the new Yankee Stadium? Built to Messi's specifications, of course.
 
Jul 1, 2010
26,336
Cronios whining because our stadium has only 41k seats :lol:

Let's check our attendance history(http://www.stadiapostcards.com/)

Juventus average attendances since 1962-1963:

1962-63 : 31 002 - 1963-64 : 28 233 - 1964-65 : 25 666 - 1965-66 : 23 373 - 1966-67 : 25 551
1967-68 : 26 747 - 1968-69 : 33 383 - 1969-70 : 37 366 - 1970-71 : 35 415 - 1971-72 : 45 667
1972-73 : 42 813 - 1973-74 : 43 916 - 1974-75 : 41 820 - 1975-76 : 37 099 - 1976-77 : 41 892
1977-78 : 40 472 - 1978-79 : 35 410 - 1979-80 : 31 144 - 1980-81 : 33 929 - 1981-82 : 37 500
1982-83 : 41 877 - 1983-84 : 43 574 - 1984-85 : 41 271 - 1985-86 : 39 654 - 1986-87 : 35 554
1987-88 : 33 081 - 1988-89 : 30 350 - 1989-90 : 29 627 - 1990-91 : 43 114 - 1991-92 : 51 832
1992-93 : 45 868 - 1993-94 : 44 520 - 1994-95 : 47 866 - 1995-96 : 41 946 - 1996-97 : 39 271
1997-98 : 47 347 - 1998-99 : 47 164 - 1999-00 : 42 229 - 2000-01 : 41 273 - 2001-02 : 40 687
2002-03 : 39 771 - 2003-04 : 34 365 - 2004-05 : 26 429 - 2005-06 : 30 469 - 2006-07 : 18 085
2007-08 : 20 930 - 2008-09 : 22 396 - 2009-10 : 22 924 - 2010-2011: 21 966

We only had once an average attendance of over 50k, 51 832 in 1991-92 to be more precise.

Granted, we had shit stadiums with athletic tracks and no coverage(except for the Delle Alpi). However, I do think that we took the right approach in building a 41k stadium that can apparently be expanded to around 55k (I found this on skyscraper city forum) if our stadium is full every game.
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,357
Cronios whining because our stadium has only 41k seats :lol:

Let's check our attendance history(http://www.stadiapostcards.com/)

Juventus average attendances since 1962-1963:

1962-63 : 31 002 - 1963-64 : 28 233 - 1964-65 : 25 666 - 1965-66 : 23 373 - 1966-67 : 25 551
1967-68 : 26 747 - 1968-69 : 33 383 - 1969-70 : 37 366 - 1970-71 : 35 415 - 1971-72 : 45 667
1972-73 : 42 813 - 1973-74 : 43 916 - 1974-75 : 41 820 - 1975-76 : 37 099 - 1976-77 : 41 892
1977-78 : 40 472 - 1978-79 : 35 410 - 1979-80 : 31 144 - 1980-81 : 33 929 - 1981-82 : 37 500
1982-83 : 41 877 - 1983-84 : 43 574 - 1984-85 : 41 271 - 1985-86 : 39 654 - 1986-87 : 35 554
1987-88 : 33 081 - 1988-89 : 30 350 - 1989-90 : 29 627 - 1990-91 : 43 114 - 1991-92 : 51 832
1992-93 : 45 868 - 1993-94 : 44 520 - 1994-95 : 47 866 - 1995-96 : 41 946 - 1996-97 : 39 271
1997-98 : 47 347 - 1998-99 : 47 164 - 1999-00 : 42 229 - 2000-01 : 41 273 - 2001-02 : 40 687
2002-03 : 39 771 - 2003-04 : 34 365 - 2004-05 : 26 429 - 2005-06 : 30 469 - 2006-07 : 18 085
2007-08 : 20 930 - 2008-09 : 22 396 - 2009-10 : 22 924 - 2010-2011: 21 966

We only had once an average attendance of over 50k, 51 832 in 1991-92 to be more precise.

Granted, we had shit stadiums with athletic tracks and no coverage(except for the Delle Alpi). However, I do think that we took the right approach in building a 41k stadium that can apparently be expanded to around 55k (I found this on skyscraper city forum) if our stadium is full every game.
Anyone smell that?

It smells like burnt hair.
 

Mike-e-y

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2004
11,090
a 35-40k seat stadium is considered tiny in books...
you guys have embraced mediocrity in all sectors far too easily, good luck finding a ticket for a good place in title decider or CL semi.
The less seats there, the more exp they will be and the less chances to find a decent we have.

But i guess the new board has decided that wont play a little decider match or a CL semi ever again...

As for the third star it will only happen after Agnelii sell us and a new influent owner buys us.
You are becoming a real pain with your pointless negativity. Not only is your post illegible it also makes no sense....

Anfield, 45,000 seats. Home to the most successful club in English football and recent CL finalists and winners.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anfield

Stamford Bridge, 41,000 seats. Home to recent double winners and CL finalists Chelsea.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stamford_Bridge_(stadium)

Stade De Gerland, 40,000 seats. Home to the most successful french team of recent years and regular competitors in the CL latter stages.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stade_de_Gerland


I could go on but it's not worth it because you wont listen anyway. A smaller stadium is more intense, and it can become a fortress if the fans are passionate. Look at Arsenal, they were invincible at highbury, a ground with a smaller capacity to our new stadium, because the fans were passionate and not diluted, since their move to the emirates they have struggled to create the same vibe and the players themselves have even criticised it. 41,000 is a good number.
 

C4ISR

Senior Member
Dec 18, 2005
2,362
a 35-40k seat stadium is considered tiny in books...
you guys have embraced mediocrity in all sectors far too easily, good luck finding a ticket for a good place in title decider or CL semi.
The less seats there, the more exp they will be and the less chances to find a decent we have.

But i guess the new board has decided that wont play a little decider match or a CL semi ever again...

As for the third star it will only happen after Agnelii sell us and a new influent owner buys us.
You just answered your own criticism.

It's called supply and demand and is exactly what the club was aiming for when it reduced the size of the Delle Alpi but increased the quality of the match day experience.
 

DIECI

Senior Member
Jul 12, 2011
2,115
a 35-40k seat stadium is considered tiny in books...
you guys have embraced mediocrity in all sectors far too easily, good luck finding a ticket for a good place in title decider or CL semi.
The less seats there, the more exp they will be and the less chances to find a decent we have.

But i guess the new board has decided that wont play a little decider match or a CL semi ever again...

As for the third star it will only happen after Agnelii sell us and a new influent owner buys us.

Seating capacity for Premier League team stadiums.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_English_football_stadiums_by_capacity

Witht he exception of Old Trafford Emeriates, and St James Park all the other Premier league teams play in stadiums of sub 50K stadiums. That indlcudes traditional CL contenders like Liverpool (42K), Chelase (41K) and new power Man City (47K). Its not the size of your stadium, its the product you put on the field thats where Juve's problem is, not the stadium size.
 

Marc

Softcore Juventino
Jul 14, 2006
21,649
Cronios whining because our stadium has only 41k seats :lol:

Let's check our attendance history(http://www.stadiapostcards.com/)

Juventus average attendances since 1962-1963:

1962-63 : 31 002 - 1963-64 : 28 233 - 1964-65 : 25 666 - 1965-66 : 23 373 - 1966-67 : 25 551
1967-68 : 26 747 - 1968-69 : 33 383 - 1969-70 : 37 366 - 1970-71 : 35 415 - 1971-72 : 45 667
1972-73 : 42 813 - 1973-74 : 43 916 - 1974-75 : 41 820 - 1975-76 : 37 099 - 1976-77 : 41 892
1977-78 : 40 472 - 1978-79 : 35 410 - 1979-80 : 31 144 - 1980-81 : 33 929 - 1981-82 : 37 500
1982-83 : 41 877 - 1983-84 : 43 574 - 1984-85 : 41 271 - 1985-86 : 39 654 - 1986-87 : 35 554
1987-88 : 33 081 - 1988-89 : 30 350 - 1989-90 : 29 627 - 1990-91 : 43 114 - 1991-92 : 51 832
1992-93 : 45 868 - 1993-94 : 44 520 - 1994-95 : 47 866 - 1995-96 : 41 946 - 1996-97 : 39 271
1997-98 : 47 347 - 1998-99 : 47 164 - 1999-00 : 42 229 - 2000-01 : 41 273 - 2001-02 : 40 687
2002-03 : 39 771 - 2003-04 : 34 365 - 2004-05 : 26 429 - 2005-06 : 30 469 - 2006-07 : 18 085
2007-08 : 20 930 - 2008-09 : 22 396 - 2009-10 : 22 924 - 2010-2011: 21 966

We only had once an average attendance of over 50k, 51 832 in 1991-92 to be more precise.

Granted, we had shit stadiums with athletic tracks and no coverage(except for the Delle Alpi). However, I do think that we took the right approach in building a 41k stadium that can apparently be expanded to around 55k (I found this on skyscraper city forum) if our stadium is full every game.
:tup: Good post.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 10)