It's a Nice Day for a Tuz Wedding (15 Viewers)

[Quetzalcoatl]

I'm voting Katie, you idiot!

My offer still stands. Change your vote to No Lynch. It's the most beneficial option for true C's.

Relax, friend. But you still voted him after you defended him. You changed your tune when others started voted for you.

I was never defending Alen in the first place, much less "heavily". Yesterday I wanted him lynched, what are you talking about?

That last part was for Sheik. Please address the first part.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Sheik Yerbouti]

I don't know, we still keep losing people and we can't just keep doing the no lynch thing forever.

Not forever. But at least for the first few rounds.

Nope. If we no lynch we will still be without answers tomorrow and we'll be in the same place while the Gs get 2 Cs in that time while we get nothing.

Nooooooooooooooooooooo! If you vote No Lynch, then the only person to die will be the one getting Whacked! If you lynch a C, then they will whack a C too. We lose 2 C's. TWO CIVILIANS!

Losing 2 is always worse than losing 1.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

Nooooooooooooooooooooo! If you vote No Lynch, then the only person to die will be the one getting Whacked! If you lynch a C, then they will whack a C too. We lose 2 C's. TWO CIVILIANS!

Losing 2 is always worse than losing 1.

Yes, and when will we get a G?

 

[ALC]

Relax, friend. But you still voted him after you defended him. You changed your tune when others started voted for you.

That last part was for Sheik. Please address the first part.

Well, you quoted me so you can see why this confusion would arise.

 

[ALC]

Yes, and when will we get a G?

Exactly, let's vote someone suspicious. This is really bad logic Sheik, we can't just keep voting no lynch. Right now we might have a 50-50 chance to get a G in case they've recruited someone.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

Well, you quoted me so you can see why this confusion would arise.

Yes, but please address the issue of your poor reasoning for changing your vote from Sheik to Melo.

 

[LowLife]

Not forever. But at least for the first few rounds.


Nooooooooooooooooooooo! If you vote No Lynch, then the only person to die will be the one getting Whacked! If you lynch a C, then they will whack a C too. We lose 2 C's. TWO CIVILIANS!

Losing 2 is always worse than losing 1.

You are a C? we'll lose only one.

Sheikh

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

I am not sure about Sheik. I am not going to vote for him, but if he gets voted out and turns out to be a C - we should hunt down everyone who voted for him, or made people vote for him.

If he is a G, we should take down those who protected him. I couldn't care less, if Sheik gotta go, he gotta go. It'll be a sacrifice worth taking.

You really want to sacrifice a C? That tells a lot about you, Melo!

Relax, friend. But you still voted him after you defended him. You changed your tune when others started voted for you.

That last part was for Sheik. Please address the first part.

I'm sorry if it seemed like I was defending him. All I asked was to be cautious about him, cos Alen is a tricky player and it's very difficult to read him. Just because he posts a lot and tries to instruct people what to do, does NOT make him a G. I've seen Alen for far too long to know that he's not so transparent.

I only voted for him when Melo accused me of favouring him. I voted against Alen to prove to Melo that I'm not with him.

I changed my tune because I was being lynched. Desperate times call for desperate measures.

 

[ALC]

Yes, but please address the issue of your poor reasoning for changing your vote from Sheik to Melo.

I was haviung second thoughts about Sheik and Melo has been active in the forum, but not in this thread. That's what's up.

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

Yes, and when will we get a G?

Exactly, let's vote someone suspicious. This is really bad logic Sheik, we can't just keep voting no lynch. Right now we might have a 50-50 chance to get a G in case they've recruited someone.

Patience, my friends. Rash decisions will end badly. Saving one C also means extending the game for one more round. One more round to find the G's. If you cannot understand the value of this, then you are poor, poor players.

You are a C? we'll lose only one.

Sheikh

I can't expect you to be a C with such a mentality. Neither you nor Melo.

LowLife, since I can't vote for both!

 

[ALC]

Yes, but please address the issue of your poor reasoning for changing your vote from Sheik to Melo.

I was haviung second thoughts about Sheik and Melo has been active in the forum, but not in this thread. That's what's up. And I like how he's saying we should vote out Sheik and then if he's a G, vote out those who changed their votes from him to someone else, which is at least me, Kyle, Alen, and Sheik all gone. That's very fucking convenient, isn't it?

 

[X Æ A-12]

I just took a shower. I'm not going anywhere.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

I'm sorry if it seemed like I was defending him. All I asked was to be cautious about him, cos Alen is a tricky player and it's very difficult to read him. Just because he posts a lot and tries to instruct people what to do, does NOT make him a G. I've seen Alen for far too long to know that he's not so transparent.

I only voted for him when Melo accused me of favouring him. I voted against Alen to prove to Melo that I'm not with him.

I changed my tune because I was being lynched. Desperate times call for desperate measures.

Once again, for the activity thing; I know. And I know Alen too, I don't trust him yet. But you could've voted someone else at that point because he wasn't close to being lynched then.

As for the 2nd paragraph, I'm not convinced.

I was haviung second thoughts about Sheik and Melo has been active in the forum, but not in this thread. That's what's up.

But you said you forgive Sheik... That just looks like a weird way to change vote and the timing was of course crucial.

I agree that Melo is suspicious.

 

[ALC]

But you said you forgive Sheik... That just looks like a weird way to change vote and the timing was of course crucial.

I agree that Melo is suspicious.

I was just trying to be cute with that.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

Okay, I want all your recommendations and I will not accept No Lynch.

 

[Kate]

Salvo - Janna

Sheik - LowLife

Treq - Sheik
LowLife - Sheik
TWW - Sheik

ALC - Melo

Kyle - Alen

Alen's vote doesn't count.

 

[SABSAB]

Salvo

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

Once again, for the activity thing; I know. And I know Alen too, I don't trust him yet. But you could've voted someone else at that point because he wasn't close to being lynched then.

As for the 2nd paragraph, I'm not convinced.

But you said you forgive Sheik... That just looks like a weird way to change vote and the timing was of course crucial.

I agree that Melo is suspicious.

Look, I was getting sick of people suspecting me because I was being rational with Alen and his behaviour. Melo was the last straw and flipped my mind. So I chose to vote against Alen to prove that I'm not with him. If you don't buy it, then fine. But saying "I could've voted someone else" is just pointless. What's done is done. I voted for Alen, and explained why. DEAL WITH IT!

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

Okay, I want all your recommendations and I will not accept No Lynch.

Fine. Katie or LowLife. I've already made my choice.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

Look, I was getting sick of people suspecting me because I was being rational with Alen and his behaviour. Melo was the last straw and flipped my mind. So I chose to vote against Alen to prove that I'm not with him. If you don't buy it, then fine. But saying "I could've voted someone else" is just pointless. What's done is done. I voted for Alen, and explained why. DEAL WITH IT!

Well, excuse me if I expect proper explanations.