It's a Nice Day for a Tuz Wedding (17 Viewers)

Quetzalcoatl

It ain't hard to tell
Aug 22, 2007
66,794
He's listening to me DESPITE telling him not to trust me or anyone else. He insists on trusting me. If it suits him then so be it.
And yeah, he was trying to convince people to vote for you but I told him not to try and to simply vote No Lynch.

For the record, you could have been lynched tonight if I tried to do it. You were really suspicious and I think, I might be wrong, that LowLife, Gabe, Klin and Sab would have voted for you if I tried to convince them.
I'm just foolish enough to still think that you're the worst civilian of all time.
I would've never thought that the latter 3 would need you to convince them who to vote for.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
Game wasn't any fun earlier today, decided not to bother with it. I am going to be active from now on. Why would I mislead anyone? Several people before me accused Janna.

Are you trying to mislead someone by questioning me?
What fucked up logic.

I question everybody, put someone under the spotlight, especially when he isn;t active and then look at how he reacts. Thats what people should do, to stop inactive G's from keeping a low profile and being inactive purposefully. I suspect inactive people especially when they stay inactive for the whole time and then all of a sudden they turn up with posts recommending who the D should investigate or who the BG should protect. That would imply that you were following the events the whole time but were not posting. The question is why?
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
54,023
What fucked up logic.

I question everybody, put someone under the spotlight, especially when he isn;t active and then look at how he reacts. Thats what people should do, to stop inactive G's from keeping a low profile and being inactive purposefully. I suspect inactive people especially when they stay inactive for the whole time and then all of a sudden they turn up with posts recommending who the D should investigate or who the BG should protect. That would imply that you were following the events the whole time but were not posting. The question is why?
Hey, as a more experienced player what do you think about Matt's logic that the detective shouldn't reveal himself if he investigates a G on day 1?

You already did that when you didn't reveal your knowledge and you were killed by me (I was the investigated G). So do you think that if the D investigated a G he should have kept quiet as Matti suggested?

Even if you're a G now, please give us a fair answer.
 

LowLife

Senior Member
Jan 7, 2011
4,967
He's listening to me DESPITE telling him not to trust me or anyone else. He insists on trusting me. If it suits him then so be it.
And yeah, he was trying to convince people to vote for you but I told him not to try and to simply vote No Lynch.

For the record, you could have been lynched tonight if I tried to do it. You were really suspicious and I think, I might be wrong, that LowLife, Gabe, Klin and Sab would have voted for you if I tried to convince them.
I'm just foolish enough to still think that you're the worst civilian of all time.
Yes I was trying to convince people because after my first vote for TWW he was send me a weird PM asking me why i voted him. I really think he is a G. And the fact that I wasn't whacked was because he'd be obvious. Klin was killed instead of me.
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
Hey, as a more experienced player what do you think about Matt's logic that the detective shouldn't reveal himself if he investigates a G on day 1?

You already did that when you didn't reveal your knowledge and you were killed by me (I was the investigated G). So do you think that if the D investigated a G he should have kept quiet as Matti suggested?

Even if you're a G now, please give us a fair answer.
First of all i don't remember that game. Secondly, your a snake and should never be trusted, especially when you tryto endear yourself to me by starting off your post by "as an experienced player" :howler:. If i had it my way you'd be lynched on the first day.

But in all cases, the detective should never reveal himself unless he finds out who the BG is. Even in that case its debatable whether he should reveal himself or work behind closed doors with the BG. Still, i find it very suspicious that your pushing for the D to reveal himself.
 

Quetzalcoatl

It ain't hard to tell
Aug 22, 2007
66,794
Yes I was trying to convince people because after my first vote for TWW he was send me a weird PM asking me why i voted him. I really think he is a G. And the fact that I wasn't whacked was because he'd be obvious. Klin was killed instead of me.
Wow, you keep contradicting your PMs.
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
54,023
I would've never thought that the latter 3 would need you to convince them who to vote for.
They have brains and they knew that you're suspicious. But none would have tried alone to give the vote for you so they did the only remaining thing, which was to vote No Lynch or not vote for me. But if I made a case against you, and since you were a suspect, they'd have followed. Just like I'd have followed them if they made a strong case against someone.
And yes, you were speaking nonsense and acting stupid, which does make you look like a G. If you weren't acting, then you were just being plain wrong and illogical.
 

X Æ A-12

Senior Member
Contributor
Sep 4, 2006
87,989
First of all i don't remember that game. Secondly, your a snake and should never be trusted, especially when you tryto endear yourself to me by starting off your post by "as an experienced player" :howler:. If i had it my way you'd be lynched on the first day.

But in all cases, the detective should never reveal himself unless he finds out who the BG is. Even in that case its debatable whether he should reveal himself or work behind closed doors with the BG. Still, i find it very suspicious that your pushing for the D to reveal himself.
:tup: He is a snake. He should be lynched on round one every game.
 

Quetzalcoatl

It ain't hard to tell
Aug 22, 2007
66,794
They have brains and they knew that you're suspicious. But none would have tried alone to give the vote for you so they did the only remaining thing, which was to vote No Lynch or not vote for me. But if I made a case against you, and since you were a suspect, they'd have followed. Just like I'd have followed them if they made a strong case against someone.
And yes, you were speaking nonsense and acting stupid, which does make you look like a G. If you weren't acting, then you were just being plain wrong and illogical.
I'm glad you and (strangely, or maybe not so strange) Sab disagree. The rest of the No lynchers are unsure new players.
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
54,023
First of all i don't remember that game. Secondly, your a snake and should never be trusted, especially when you tryto endear yourself to me by starting off your post by "as an experienced player" :howler:. If i had it my way you'd be lynched on the first day.

But in all cases, the detective should never reveal himself unless he finds out who the BG is. Even in that case its debatable whether he should reveal himself or work behind closed doors with the BG. Still, i find it very suspicious that your pushing for the D to reveal himself.
Really, you don't? :D
Well, Kyle remembers it well :snoop:

And for the billionth time, I am not pushing the D to reveal himself. At least not until he finds a G. If the D isn't Nzoric and if he investigated today, then he did good not to reveal himself if he got a C.
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
:tup: He is a snake. He should be lynched on round one every game.
He's a snake no doubt. But this is your second post in a row where you just agree with me. Just for the record, i was a G before, and i used that sort of tactic too ;)
 

Gabriel

Killed By Death
May 23, 2010
10,608
The only reason why matt hasn't been singled out for a lynch is because of his erratic behaviour every game.

I personally didn't want to throw accusations yet because I think the D didn't investigate (or investigated a C) and lynching a C would be suicide for us and we might as well forfeit given the case.

We'll see how this pans out tomorrow if/when the D investigates and if he/she gets lucky and spots a G.
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
54,023
BTW Alen why were you talking so much about Klin's death?
It could have been a clue to finding a G. Klin was killed by the Gs so they surely had a reason to kill him and think that he has a special role. But his posts give no clue whatsoever. Maybe they thought he was a special role and went inactive in order not to attract attention. If that's the case then we have no clues again.
Personally I was hoping that Klin attacked someone and that one was a G who was afraid to be discovered and thus whacked Klin. But Klin attacked noone.

Bah, put that behind us. We got no clues from his death. The Gs will explain the logic behind it when the game ends.
 

X Æ A-12

Senior Member
Contributor
Sep 4, 2006
87,989
He's a snake no doubt. But this is your second post in a row where you just agree with me. Just for the record, i was a G before, and i used that sort of tactic too ;)
and you have been accusing anything that moves while the reasoning seems secondary. Something I typically do as a G.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 17)