Italy Vs. Holland (Euro2008) (3 Viewers)

OP

Mr. Mercury

New Member
Thread Starter #6
Apr 23, 2008
46
  • Thread Starter
    • Thread Starter #6
    hey all, i don't know if openning threads early wrong or not but many forums opened threads for matches...
    if u want i will delete it
     
    OP

    Mr. Mercury

    New Member
    Thread Starter #7
    Apr 23, 2008
    46
  • Thread Starter
    • Thread Starter #7
    JCK said:
    You can open the thread earlier, there's no problem in that, but what is your problem with ReMad?
    Click to expand...
    this guy always fight me and when i post private message to him asking him to stop fight, he simply ignotre my message and never reply
    anyway, i'm sorry coz i lost temper but the last thing i imagine that someone says i'm like him
    anyway,please feel free to delete any message to clean this thread and i'll delete the last message
     
    delpierofan82

    delpierofan82

    Senior Member
    #8
    Apr 24, 2005
    5,612
    #8
    Cuti

    Cuti

    The Real MC
    #11
    Jul 30, 2006
    13,517
    #11
    According to the linesman it was onside because there is Panucci on the floor clutching his face, and according to the rules if a player is outside the pitch during an action he is considered to be on the touchline, though since Panucci was down injured clutching his face it shouldn't have counted
     
    Raj_05

    Raj_05

    Junior Member
    #16
    Feb 19, 2008
    309
    #16
    JCK said:
    Now you are creating your own rules, when a player is outside the line he is not considered in play and in that case the goal was 100% offside.
    Click to expand...
    The new rules are indeed twisted, FIFA Law 11 {Offside} states that a player UNLESS permitted by the Referee and/or not within the area where the ball is in play (thereby not being the second-last man) IS actually involved ; thereby playing Ruud Van Nistelroy onside....

    Also the most important thing being pointed out is that Panucci was pushed by BUFFON and not fouled by an opponent, hence the referee was not obliged to blow in case of an injury....

    This whole thing is bizarre, but it sadly is the truth.... :crazy:
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 3)