[ITA] Serie A 2008/2009 (38 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
Felipe Melo (CLASS)
Vargas
Jovetic
Gilardino

as compared to:

Poulsen
Amauri
Mellberg
Knezevic


I think they win
They definitely win. And before somebody jumps and tells me that they're 4th and Juve is 3rd. I say, judge these players based on their performances not on their teams position.

Gilardino and Melo have done very well this year. Jovetic is one for the future, he looks like he could be the real deal. Vargas hasn't done as well as expected, especially judging by his price tag, but he has done well lately when played at left wing.

Knezevic has been a useless signing. Mellberg has been solid at times and average at others, Amauri i'd say was a very good signing, i personally rate him highly. Poulsen is debatable. I personally think he was a decent signing, although a lot of people disagree.

Overall, Fiorentina have made better acquisitions over the summer though.
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
54,028
Knezevic is on loan to Juve. He could be compared to Zauri or Almiron who are on loan to Fiorentina. I don't think it's fair to include him in the list.

Here is a fair comparison:
Gilardino-Amauri
Melo-Poulsen
Jovetic-Giovinco (we didn't buy him but we did strenghten this year's team with him)
Comotto-Mellberg

They have Vargas left, while we brought Marchisio and De Ceglie to the team.
They took Zauri and Almiron on loan, we did it with Knezevic.

It's close. Only Melo proved to be a better transfer than Poulsen this season.
Fiorentina did spend much more cash than we did though.
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
Knezevic is on loan to Juve. He could be compared to Zauri or Almiron who are on loan to Fiorentina. I don't think it's fair to include him in the list.

Here is a fair comparison:
Gilardino-Amauri
Melo-Poulsen
Jovetic-Giovinco (we didn't buy him but we did strenghten this year's team with him)
Comotto-Mellberg

They have Vargas left, while we brought Marchisio and De Ceglie to the team.
They took Zauri and Almiron on loan, we did it with Knezevic.

It's close. Only Melo proved to be a better transfer than Poulsen this season.
Fiorentina did spend much more cash than we did though.
No but you guys already own Giovinco, De Ceglie and Marchisio. I don't think they should be counted at all, as the board(or whoever is responsible for transfers) did not go through the process of looking for a suitable player and negotiating with another team to acquire that player.

You're right about Knezevic though.
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
54,028
That's prpbably why we are seeing that Mutu is being linked for a transfer. Fiorentina were relegated recently because of bankrupcy, will we see that again?
Dunno if we'll see it, but i do think that they will need to sell players.
I checked last season's transfers and i see that they had the biggest minus by far. They paid ~50m for new players (including loans) and they earned only 5m eur from Potenza and Caccia in the summer. They had a minus of 45m euro.
I don't remember when was the last time a serie A team had such minus.
Last summer we bought players for ~38m eur but we also sold players (+loans +co-ownerships) for 25m eur so we had a minus of ~13m eur only.
Even on our serie B comeback when we were forced to splash a lot, we had a minus of ~35m eur. Milan and Inter also can't afford to do what Fiorentina did.

In the winter Fiorentina started selling. They sold Pazzini and Osvaldo. Now they announce that they can't spend money in the summer and i'm pretty sure that they'll be forced to sell more players.

They played with fire last summer. Time will tell if it will cost them.
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,799
Our mercato will gradually improve for every year that is gone past Calciopoli.
But it's a bad sign when our choices for mercato were clearly worse than Fiorentina's. In fact, I was envious of them more than anyone else in Serie A this year. Maybe they paid through the nose for it. But I would have rather had half their players for the same price than spending the same amount on more, lesser players.
 

v1rtu4l

Senior Member
Mar 4, 2008
6,349
i just wanna mention that it is much easier to get players that have a good impact,when the team has a much lower quality standard.

what impact would those players have had in juve ?

gila would have found very few space,

vargas would not have found space as left back, because he seems to be suspicious on that part (that is probably the reason he plays lm or left wing for the viola)

comotto is really weaker than mellberg and would not stand a chance against legro

taking off my fan glasses i would say it is perhaps en par with jovetic and giovinco ... did not see enough from jovetic that really did count (assist or goal)

melo, this guy i sadly can not say much about ... i dont know if he had seen any first team appearances when zanetti and sissoko was fit.

fact is fiorentinas quality standards was way lower than ours, so it was easier to find someone that would improve that


I don't remember when was the last time a serie A team had such minus.
Last summer we bought players for ~38m eur but we also sold players (+loans +co-ownerships) for 25m eur so we had a minus of ~13m eur only.
Even on our serie B comeback when we were forced to splash a lot, we had a minus of ~35m eur. Milan and Inter also can't afford to do what Fiorentina did.
my source says 30.6m € minus, but your point stands ... they made a big minus !
http://www.transfermarkt.de/de/verein/430/ac-florenz/transfers/uebersicht.html
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
54,028
I think Felipe Melo was going to be a sure starter in Juve. It wasn't going to look nice, but Melo-Sissoko in the center was going to be scarry for the opposition midfielders.
Afterall, Felipe Melo is now a regular in Brazil's NT so it must say something.

I agree with your main point though.
 

Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
27,519
Knezevic is on loan to Juve. He could be compared to Zauri or Almiron who are on loan to Fiorentina. I don't think it's fair to include him in the list.

Here is a fair comparison:
Gilardino-Amauri
Melo-Poulsen
Jovetic-Giovinco (we didn't buy him but we did strenghten this year's team with him)
Comotto-Mellberg

They have Vargas left, while we brought Marchisio and De Ceglie to the team.
They took Zauri and Almiron on loan, we did it with Knezevic.

It's close. Only Melo proved to be a better transfer than Poulsen this season.
Fiorentina did spend much more cash than we did though.
They did not had Moggi to provide them with such talents and it is unfair to compare the players our board inherited, with the players Fiorentina had to buy...
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
I think Felipe Melo was going to be a sure starter in Juve. It wasn't going to look nice, but Melo-Sissoko in the center was going to be scarry for the opposition midfielders.
Afterall, Felipe Melo is now a regular in Brazil's NT so it must say something.

I agree with your main point though.


So is Gilberto Silva that must say something too ;)
 

Bozi

The Bozman
Administrator
Oct 18, 2005
22,749
Parma
Lazio
Milan
Inter
Fiorentina

that's sure a lot of Serie A teams to play for.
aye but christian vieri top trumps him in sheer volume of serie a clubs

Our mercato will gradually improve for every year that is gone past Calciopoli.
of course it will, just don't tell anyone, otherwise there will be nothing to moan about

icεmαή;1990784 said:
Its a nice feeling to know that we are getting back up (financially) gradually but steadily from the effects of Calciopoli... Can I add that the 5yr plan makes sense?
to a businessman this is perfect sense, to a football fan it is unambitious and weak of our board

But it's a bad sign when our choices for mercato were clearly worse than Fiorentina's. In fact, I was envious of them more than anyone else in Serie A this year. Maybe they paid through the nose for it. But I would have rather had half their players for the same price than spending the same amount on more, lesser players.
see this is some of the problem, most of the posters here believe we already overpay for players, if we were to follow fiorentina's lead of throwing money at clubs until they say when we will be fucked in 2 years
 

Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
27,519
Regarding the 5 year plan, it is already compromised, unless we see some spectacular changes/spending this and the next year.
We have failed to increase the percentage of quality starters in our team and we have wasted too much time and money on incompetent players.
We could have added 2-5 more starters by now, considering the money and time we spent and already field a competitive team and easily replace our champions in the future.
But we can now barely replace our retiring champions by the end of the 5 years...
and thats IF and only IF, we start becoming efficient and make a complete U turn into our transfer policy...

Just a good year of signings cannot perform miracles and wont e enough, because, we are way behind schedule...
 

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,024
They said that they can't invest much this summer. Last summer they spent 47.5m eur only on transfer fees for Gilardino, Melo, Vargas, Jovetic and Comotto. Last week their director told the fans not to expect major signings this summer.
:agree:

They said last summer they were basically spending two years budget in one summer.
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
125,395
Dunno if we'll see it, but i do think that they will need to sell players.
I checked last season's transfers and i see that they had the biggest minus by far. They paid ~50m for new players (including loans) and they earned only 5m eur from Potenza and Caccia in the summer. They had a minus of 45m euro.
I don't remember when was the last time a serie A team had such minus.
Last summer we bought players for ~38m eur but we also sold players (+loans +co-ownerships) for 25m eur so we had a minus of ~13m eur only.
Even on our serie B comeback when we were forced to splash a lot, we had a minus of ~35m eur. Milan and Inter also can't afford to do what Fiorentina did.

In the winter Fiorentina started selling. They sold Pazzini and Osvaldo. Now they announce that they can't spend money in the summer and i'm pretty sure that they'll be forced to sell more players.

They played with fire last summer. Time will tell if it will cost them.
Their gamble is Champions League and it seems they are winning the bet. Stupid Genoa.
 

BillyG

Caribbean Ultra
Nov 25, 2006
4,151
just reading mourinho's pre-match comments on C4 and i think we could possibly take a page out of his books this summer...

“I agree we should not spend too much and the best way to avoid that is to think back on how money has been wasted before. If I take three youngsters into the first team and remove three who earn £9m, with that money we can buy a world class star.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 38)