Is Hamsik still overrated? (3 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,941
#47
Milan s--ks yet Pirlo and Seedorf in top 5. :shifty: This year, you mean this YEAR or season?
This season.
It doesn't matter if Milan sucks. They're still the team with most passes in serie A (most of them useless).
The list was meant to show that Hamsik isn't just a ghost who disappears during the match and only appears in the box to score a goal. He's there, involved in Napoli's playmaking.
 
OP
Bjerknes

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,024
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #49
    You all know that i'm his biggest fan here, but even though you always agreed with me on this, I don't know what are you trying to achieve with this thread. :)
    Just something to talk about. Highlighting idiocy is a good thing.
     

    nabulio

    Junior Member
    Jan 31, 2008
    322
    #52
    he is a good player indeed and if the coach find the right place for him, he will shine.

    but talks about underrated, overrated... who cares?
     

    Hust

    Senior Member
    Hustini
    May 29, 2005
    93,703
    #54
    I have three comments here:

    1.) Melo is on the list because he fights his ass off and wins a lot of balls in midfield.

    2.) It is pointless to spend so much money on Hamsik now. It is too late. Basically its the Melo and Diego deal all over again. As andy said its fun to point out idiocy.

    3.) Based off of point 2 we need to start looking for our own talent that other teams drool over. I don't know about you but I would rather spend 5m dollars on a future 30m dollar player than spend the 30m dollars to get the player after he has been "discovered". This thread, I am assuming, is Andy's way (which I agree with 100%) of telling/showing us how we really missed the boat on this one.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 3)