Orright guys, the Indian general election is over. But hang on, thats not what i expect would interest you guys. Its the end result. Sonia Gandhi, the leader of the Congress (winning party) has been tipped to become Prime Minister of India. And guess what? Shes Italian. Born in Ovassanjo, 80 km away from Turin. She married in to India's biggest political dynasty: the Gandhi dynasty. Which moved from Jawaharlal Nehru to Indira Gandhi to her son Rajiv (Sonia's husband). And now she is on the verge of taking up this mantle of leading the county. Although not of Indian descent she has accustomed herself to its culture, the language and overcome any barriers that would otherwise disqualify her to be leader of the Congress. Ok now to the crux of the matter. Being the largest democracy in the world with a population of close to 1.2 billion people, of whom the majority is the rural population. Now my question to you guys is, the BJP (the better yet losing party) did a lot for the country on a global level as well as for the economics of the country. However, i must admit they lost touch with the poor, whose needs as we now realise were not met. Do you think, someone like Sonia Gandhi would change all that? Lets keep in mind a couple of factors. The Congress and their allies are extremely corrupt after the gandhi dynasty crumbled. Which is why this has been termed the biggest upset in Indian political history. And, Mr. Vajpayee, ex PM and leader of the BJP had the undisputed respect of everyone. The poor, thought they needed a change. But do you guys think it makes sense to try an alternative, when the country on a larger level was stable and a lot better than wat it was when the congress was in power last.
And do you also think international descent matters when it comes to leading a country?
And do you also think international descent matters when it comes to leading a country?
