++ [ originally posted by Ian ] ++
I don't know. I think that they've got the right idea, just poor execution. They need to do away with the whole pass or fail idea completely. Why not evaluate students based on what they've learned, rather than what they should have learned?
I don't know. I think that they've got the right idea, just poor execution. They need to do away with the whole pass or fail idea completely. Why not evaluate students based on what they've learned, rather than what they should have learned?
This issue is related somehow to standardized tests. These tests don’t accurately evaluate a student’s potential to learn/succeed.
