This guy gonna get results here. I feel it. Someone who understands Juve. I knew as soon as Motta said he wasn't obsessed with winning, it was a matter of time.
Buy on AliExpress.com
Igor Tudor (68 Viewers)
- Thread starter Mark
- Start date
Buy on AliExpress.com
In my opinion Igor Tudor is probably one of the best short term solutions we could find under the current circumstances, he knows the club and will demand a winning mentality while keeping tactics simple(hopefully by just fielding players in their correct roles/positions can already make a big difference), which should be enough to at least give us a much better chance at securing that 4th spot.
Tudor was bound to happen , we knew that, he fits the bill. we know the drill too well, expect him to be the new messiah, ignore the early red flag, have faith , give him time, let the player managers keep running the club and waste our budget, eventually fail to be competitive yet again, lose patience , make him a scapegoat, fire him and pay him five years of salary, find the next unproven scapegoat puppet, rinse and repeat...
According to most rumors he will be here only as an interim, and he is basically the best option available to pick from, most fit to give us a short term boost towards achieving that 4th spot, and if he manages to secure it than it would be only natural that we’d at least evaluate and take him into consideration for a longer term project…
Either way, for now i’d rather just focus on the present day instead of creating doomsday scenarios about what might happen after a year or two.
Either way, for now i’d rather just focus on the present day instead of creating doomsday scenarios about what might happen after a year or two.
they always make the same excuses.
Where we stand now, is exactly where we were bound to be before even the season started. We knew Motta did not have the experience for that, that we will not be competitive and we will waste yet another season.
Why we had to take such risk?
Why did we not include a performance clause?
Why did we make a five year contract and are now bound to compensate Motta?
For him to accept the scapegoat role and protect the upper management.
The exact same thing has happened with Allegri and the exact same thing will happen with Tudor.
Again, we will see him sign a five year contract and not a 1+1
Again we will not introduce a performance clause.
Again we will waste the next season by not having a proper coach handling the transfers and build up of our team, himself. By preaching false hopes and expectations for the new scapegoat.
Again we will see a false crisis when the CL spot is about to slip.
And the very same cycle yet again...
This is keep happening over and over again, stop pretending !
Where we stand now, is exactly where we were bound to be before even the season started. We knew Motta did not have the experience for that, that we will not be competitive and we will waste yet another season.
Why we had to take such risk?
Why did we not include a performance clause?
Why did we make a five year contract and are now bound to compensate Motta?
For him to accept the scapegoat role and protect the upper management.
The exact same thing has happened with Allegri and the exact same thing will happen with Tudor.
Again, we will see him sign a five year contract and not a 1+1
Again we will not introduce a performance clause.
Again we will waste the next season by not having a proper coach handling the transfers and build up of our team, himself. By preaching false hopes and expectations for the new scapegoat.
Again we will see a false crisis when the CL spot is about to slip.
And the very same cycle yet again...
This is keep happening over and over again, stop pretending !
History doesn’t always repeat itself, for all we know someone else taking over could be just another failed experiment too…
Hence why it’s an option and not obligation, not including even an option would mean neither the players nor the coach would be eager to prove much, atm this is the right way to go about it, evaluate short term and determine in the summer if there is any progress or signs of consistent improvement, afterwards make a decision accordingly by taking into consideration also who else is available at that moment.
Remains to be seen how we’ll go about it then but for now let’s just hope it works out well and we achieve UCL qualification.
Hence why it’s an option and not obligation, not including even an option would mean neither the players nor the coach would be eager to prove much, atm this is the right way to go about it, evaluate short term and determine in the summer if there is any progress or signs of consistent improvement, afterwards make a decision accordingly by taking into consideration also who else is available at that moment.
Remains to be seen how we’ll go about it then but for now let’s just hope it works out well and we achieve UCL qualification.
I know you're trying to be funny but NO. Tudor does not have the credentials to lead Juventus. History has shown that players tend to briefly do well under "new managers" when they hated the previous manager that they had been under. This brings a new fresh phase of enthusiasm which could eventually fizzle out. There are many cases of this. Remember when Inter hired Andrea Stramaccioni? He won them the Milan derby and did well as an interim, only to flop next season. Under no circumstance should Tudor be made permanent. Its a marathon not a sprint. Besides, who said about hiring anyone unknown? Hiring someone with credentials and a proven manager is hardly what I would consider 'unknown.'