Giuseppe 'The Savior' Rossi - ST - Villareal (18 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

radekas

( ͠° ͟ل͜ ͡°)
Aug 26, 2009
20,128
what those stats tell me is that rossi played more games, so he is fitter to play more matches without nagging injury problems. something that is good considering how often our players suffer from fatigue and injury problems.

the other thing it tells me is that people here massivel overrate aguero, and the same time making rossi seem bad when their stats are pretty close yet the price points very different.
Well tbh he played more games, cause Villareal was in Europa League semis (15 games), while Atletico didn't get out of their group(4 games). That's 11. Other 4 can be anything.

Also, you assume that I use those stats to downgrade Rossi, while fapping to Aguero. All I do is pointing out that Kun had actually better numbers, when you look closely at them. I will be happy with any of them in Juventus, as they are both an upgrade for sure.
 

Lion

King of Tuz
Jan 24, 2007
36,185
Well tbh he played more games, cause Villareal was in Europa League semis (15 games), while Atletico didn't get out of their group(4 games). That's 11. Other 4 can be anything.

Also, you assume that I use those stats to downgrade Rossi, while fapping to Aguero. All I do is pointing out that Kun had actually better numbers, when you look closely at them. I will be happy with any of them in Juventus, as they are both an upgrade for sure.
no i get your point. but let us be reality here. there is no way this club would spalsh 45 million, which is likely our entire budget, on one player. think of the last time we did something like (nedved, Buffon) we only did it because we got major money from selling zidone
 

AndreaCristiano

Nato, Vive, e muore Italiano
Jun 9, 2011
19,125
no i get your point. but let us be reality here. there is no way this club would spalsh 45 million, which is likely our entire budget, on one player. think of the last time we did something like (nedved, Buffon) we only did it because we got major money from selling zidone
There lies the truth. If ATM insist on 45 million its not worth it nor will it happen so Therefore Rodeo is the better fit in this situation
 

radekas

( ͠° ͟ل͜ ͡°)
Aug 26, 2009
20,128
no i get your point. but let us be reality here. there is no way this club would spalsh 45 million, which is likely our entire budget, on one player. think of the last time we did something like (nedved, Buffon) we only did it because we got major money from selling zidone
Lets be a reality? Haha hfboards.com much? :D
 

Itztli

'Curious'
May 12, 2011
3,302
Not to cause an argument, but you guys paint out Rossi to seem like he's the big bad wolf. He's not bad player, and adds a element on to our attack, but if we don't get El Kun, I rather use the money we have to get a good LW & shore up the defense.
 

X Æ A-12

Senior Member
Contributor
Sep 4, 2006
87,934
Not to cause an argument, but you guys paint out Rossi to seem like he's the big bad wolf. He's not bad player, and adds a element on to our attack, but if we don't get El Kun, I rather use the money we have to get a good LW & shore up the defense.
:tup:

This is exactly what I have been thinking. If we don't invest in Kun, or a player of similar quality, then we should put that money towards an alternative to Bonucci, and a new player in CM, to partner not replace Melo, or at LB. I'm assuming a LW will be signed anyway regardless.
 

AndreaCristiano

Nato, Vive, e muore Italiano
Jun 9, 2011
19,125
:tup:

This is exactly what I have been thinking. If we don't invest in Kun, or a player of similar quality, then we should put that money towards an alternative to Bonucci, and a new player in CM or at LB. I'm assuming a LW will be signed anyway regardless.
no its not what you have been saying. what nate said was that Rossi adds an element to our attack while the money we would save by signing him could solidify the other spots. You have never said that rossi is an alternative to il kun
 

X Æ A-12

Senior Member
Contributor
Sep 4, 2006
87,934
Not to cause an argument, but you guys paint out Rossi to seem like he's the big bad wolf. He's not bad player, and adds a element on to our attack, but if we don't get El Kun, I rather use the money we have to get a good LW & shore up the defense.
no its not what you have been saying. what nate said was that Rossi adds an element to our attack while the money we would save by signing him could solidify the other spots. You have never said that rossi is an alternative to il kun
:sergio:
 

Joe

Senior Member
Dec 20, 2009
14,980
Not to cause an argument, but you guys paint out Rossi to seem like he's the big bad wolf. He's not bad player, and adds a element on to our attack, but if we don't get El Kun, I rather use the money we have to get a good LW & shore up the defense.
Because Rossi didn't choose the American NT, alot of Americans now have a bias towards him and instantly write him off. They make us seem like we're the delusional ones for seeing quality in Rossi. I'm glad to see that you don't feel the same.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 17)