napoleonic

Senior Member
Sep 7, 2010
4,129
This is true, but notice how the opinions in question are on the extreme ends of one another. In one, he says that Rossi is someone our ultranationalist board will "waste resources and our champion-slot on", and that we can't "do any better" etc. In the other, he presents Rossi as a prestige signing that we could "only dream of".
they Cronios are insecure and this is a defense mechanism
Cronios wanted a proven CF/ST, but as we all have utterly being trolled by Marotta, we have subconsciously lowered our standard; atthis rate, anything that's better than matri/quaq/boriello/bendtner is acceptable.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Nzoric

Grazie Mirko
Jan 16, 2011
37,877
Like you can offer any even your life depends on it...

Yes it is, fascism uses violence to suppress any different opinion that doesnt fit its spirit.
This is exactly the case here, they use extreme violence, to directly ban, one speaking about Juve with his argumentation
and call that trolling, because he dares to have a different opinion and presents arguments that cannot by countered
and the hyppocrites let pages of trolling GIFS and one liner insults without any kind of infarctions.

And thye dont even have the balls, real balls, to claim responsebility and bother to give another a lame excuse for yet another abuse of power...

Never? You cant know,not your fault really, but i am a member more than a decade and i have history here.
How about the EPO trials+Canna drug Video+Zlatan post match ban+Italian press+TV shows that were creating an Anti-Juve propaganda,
and systematically trying our defences, because they have senced that we were not as influent as before.
When i said that years pre-calciopoli everybody was loughing back then too.

The changes that calciopoli brought, my reaction to certain transfers, strategic decisions (Boumsong, CR, DN, Ferrara, Molinaro, Amauri, Motta, Grosso, etc) pretty much everything i insisted upon, all alone vs the occasional group of that been and gone, came true.
Pardon me, but there are only a hand of members daring to oppose the majority and been proved right by history and must of them are now innactive.

But never, NEVER, the forum has ever reached so low standards, not to tolerate a different decision.
We had all kinds of trolls before, but to fascistically silence senior members and promote trolls, that only add insults, flame and racist GIFS in the forums, is a new low, never to see before.

As everything does circles, some days the forums well get a proper mod team and order will return...
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
Cronios wanted a proven CF/ST, but as we all have utterly being trolled by Marotta, we have subconsciously lowered our standard; atthis rate, anything that's better than matri/quaq/boriello/bendtner is acceptable.
unbeaten scudetto
record points in a year
still lower wagebill then when he started
on the way to break even, if lucky, a year ahead of schedule
team trough in the toughest group
bonucci, barzagli,lichtsteiner,asamoah,pirlo,vidal,vucinic


Oh, do let the trolling go on please
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,141
So, lets just look at it season by season.

2010: Quagliarella, Matri, Krasic, Aquilani (the supposed best young player in the world according to Buffon), and Pepe. All either failures or essentially deep bench players. What did we say? Marotta is building a good base, this takes time.

2011: Pirlo, Vidal, Lichtsteiner, Vucinic, Giaccherini, Estigarribia, Elia. Some good, some bad, some ugly. Pirlo was already established and a no brainer, Vidal was great in Germany and wanted to come to Juventus a la Diego. The others were mediocre.

2012: Pogba, Asamoah, Giovinco, Lucio, Bendtner, Peluso. First two are very good, and I will give credit for the Pogba signing as he was highly touted, but the others are either easy singings or simply blah.

Looking over this list, there seems to be more turnover than established players, even established BENCH players. Obviously, we haven't signed a true quality striker (although we might sign an essentially retired Drogba, which is fantastic, because this means Marotta is MLS-proven), so I'm not sure where exactly he can be excused from this market fact.

Perhaps it's just me, but his list of signings is not very impressive at all and I don't really see why folks here love him so much. But at least he didn't sign Jewseppi from Jersey, that is probably his best decision.
 

ZoSo

Senior Member
Jul 11, 2011
41,656
So, lets just look at it season by season.

2010: Quagliarella, Matri, Krasic, Aquilani (the supposed best young player in the world according to Buffon), and Pepe. All either failures or essentially deep bench players. What did we say? Marotta is building a good base, this takes time.

2011: Pirlo, Vidal, Lichtsteiner, Vucinic, Giaccherini, Estigarribia, Elia. Some good, some bad, some ugly. Pirlo was already established and a no brainer, Vidal was great in Germany and wanted to come to Juventus a la Diego. The others were mediocre.

2012: Pogba, Asamoah, Giovinco, Lucio, Bendtner, Peluso. First two are very good, and I will give credit for the Pogba signing as he was highly touted, but the others are either easy singings or simply blah.

Looking over this list, there seems to be more turnover than established players, even established BENCH players. Obviously, we haven't signed a true quality striker (although we might sign an essentially retired Drogba, which is fantastic, because this means Marotta is MLS-proven), so I'm not sure where exactly he can be excused from this market fact.

Perhaps it's just me, but his list of signings is not very impressive at all and I don't really see why folks here love him so much. But at least he didn't sign Jewseppi from Jersey, that is probably his best decision.
Indeed. (and Cronios and his lackey boy napoelon).


You forgot Barzagli & Bonucci. Out of our starting XI now, 8 are Marotta signings. Barza, Bonucci, Licht, Pirlo, Vidal, Asamoah and Gio/Mirko/Quag/Matri.

nuff said.
 

Lion

King of Tuz
Jan 24, 2007
36,185
So, lets just look at it season by season.

2010: Quagliarella, Matri, Krasic, Aquilani (the supposed best young player in the world according to Buffon), and Pepe. All either failures or essentially deep bench players. What did we say? Marotta is building a good base, this takes time.

2011: Pirlo, Vidal, Lichtsteiner, Vucinic, Giaccherini, Estigarribia, Elia. Some good, some bad, some ugly. Pirlo was already established and a no brainer, Vidal was great in Germany and wanted to come to Juventus a la Diego. The others were mediocre.

2012: Pogba, Asamoah, Giovinco, Lucio, Bendtner, Peluso. First two are very good, and I will give credit for the Pogba signing as he was highly touted, but the others are either easy singings or simply blah.

Looking over this list, there seems to be more turnover than established players, even established BENCH players. Obviously, we haven't signed a true quality striker (although we might sign an essentially retired Drogba, which is fantastic, because this means Marotta is MLS-proven), so I'm not sure where exactly he can be excused from this market fact.

Perhaps it's just me, but his list of signings is not very impressive at all and I don't really see why folks here love him so much. But at least he didn't sign Jewseppi from Jersey, that is probably his best decision.
think of it like this

no one talks about einstein's failed thoery of light deflection, or other things that were proven false. they remember him for all the good stuff he came up with. people tend to focus on the positive. no victory is without errors and sacrifices. rome wasn't built in a day
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,141
Indeed. (and Cronios and his lackey boy napoelon).


You forgot Barzagli & Bonucci. Out of our starting XI now, 8 are Marotta signings. Barza, Bonucci, Licht, Pirlo, Vidal, Asamoah and Gio/Mirko/Quag/Matri.

nuff said.
I don't consider Bonucci all that great. I was wrong about Barzagli, but that's just one player.

Obviously the strike force you listed is not up to par, otherwise we wouldn't have to discuss them.

Despite the players you listed, the majority of the players signed are either not up to par or no longer at the club, which is a very strange predicament since Marotta has only been here for a few seasons. That cannot be considered a good track record in any realm of management whatsoever, even the hotel industry.

- - - Updated - - -

Building a base of players is perfectly fine, but not when you have to offload them a year later.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
So, lets just look at it season by season.

2010: Quagliarella, Matri, Krasic, Aquilani (the supposed best young player in the world according to Buffon), and Pepe. All either failures or essentially deep bench players. What did we say? Marotta is building a good base, this takes time.
excuse me ? quag was fantastic before injury, krasic started very good, and then del neri failed to get around teams tripplemarking him

Barzagli in januari ? Pepe his performances season after ?

2011: Pirlo, Vidal, Lichtsteiner, Vucinic, Giaccherini, Estigarribia, Elia. Some good, some bad, some ugly. Pirlo was already established and a no brainer, Vidal was great in Germany and wanted to come to Juventus a la Diego. The others were mediocre.
Pirlo was NOT a no brainer, many tought he was finished.
Lichtsteiner mediocre ? what utter bullshit is this ? did you even watch the chelsea game, or so many others ?
Vucinic, our most important forward ?

2012: Pogba, Asamoah, Giovinco, Lucio, Bendtner, Peluso. First two are very good, and I will give credit for the Pogba signing as he was highly touted, but the others are either easy singings or simply blah.
this i can agree on, tho peluso does what he came for

Looking over this list, there seems to be more turnover than established players, even established BENCH players. Obviously, we haven't signed a true quality striker (although we might sign an essentially retired Drogba, which is fantastic, because this means Marotta is MLS-proven), so I'm not sure where exactly he can be excused from this market fact.
Perhaps it's just me, but his list of signings is not very impressive at all and I don't really see why folks here love him so much. But at least he didn't sign Jewseppi from Jersey, that is probably his best decision.[/QUOTE]

team that beat the record points in a calenderyear, topped toughest CL group, without their coach on the sidelines :

buffon, bonucci, barzagli, chiellini, asamoah, lichtsteiner, pirlo, vidal, marchisio, vucinic, quagliarella

8 signings by marotta

Yeah, those obviously are all bench players
 

ZoSo

Senior Member
Jul 11, 2011
41,656
I don't consider Bonucci all that great. I was wrong about Barzagli, but that's just one player.

Obviously the strike force you listed is not up to par, otherwise we wouldn't have to discuss them.

Despite the players you listed, the majority of the players signed are either not up to par or no longer at the club, which is a very strange predicament since Marotta has only been here for a few seasons. That cannot be considered a good track record in any realm of management whatsoever, even the hotel industry.

- - - Updated - - -

Building a base of players is perfectly fine, but not when you have to offload them a year later.
I disagree about Bonucci, he is a great defender and as of now and I wouldn't trade him for any other CB (ok maybe only Thiago Silva). We arguably have the best defense in europe and a large part of that is thanks to Marotta.

Well, I would say it is up to par, considering our success so far. It may have trouble in the latter CL stages, but that remains to be seen.

I don't see what the problem is with that considering we have a pretty strong squad right now that looks like it can be together for quite a few years.


From players signed 2011-12 onwards (besides returned loans), only 3 players signed have left. Pazienza, Elia & Lucio. Our base isn't going anywhere. This just goes to show that the 2010-11 (beginning of 11-12) period was an anomaly in terms of players leaving, as now not many players will be leaving in the near future.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,141
excuse me ? quag was fantastic before injury, krasic started very good, and then del neri failed to get around teams tripplemarking him

Barzagli in januari ? Pepe his performances season after ?



Pirlo was NOT a no brainer, many tought he was finished.
Lichtsteiner mediocre ? what utter bull$#@! is this ? did you even watch the chelsea game, or so many others ?
Vucinic, our most important forward ?



this i can agree on, tho peluso does what he came for



Perhaps it's just me, but his list of signings is not very impressive at all and I don't really see why folks here love him so much. But at least he didn't sign Jewseppi from Jersey, that is probably his best decision.

team that beat the record points in a calenderyear, topped toughest CL group, without their coach on the sidelines :

buffon, bonucci, barzagli, chiellini, asamoah, lichtsteiner, pirlo, vidal, marchisio, vucinic, quagliarella

8 signings by marotta

Yeah, those obviously are all bench players
Quag is now only a bench player as far as we are concerned. Krasic is obviously a goner, so his start doesn't really count. Pepe is, in my view, an overrated player on this forum and never should have been brought in.

Lichtsteiner is actually one of my favorite players on the side.

Both Quag and Vucinic are considered bench players as we would not be discussing the likes of Drogba and Llorente if they were suitable. Every single poster here knows we need better strikers, so that isn't argument, especially on this board of "give them time" optimism.

And again, the amount of turnover from recent signings is still far too high and needs to be addressed. Our investment prospectus does need some tweaking, which means signing younger and more risky talents, not players like Pepe and Giaccherini whom we already know will not provide us much return on our investment.
 

ZoSo

Senior Member
Jul 11, 2011
41,656
2 of our top 4 scorers are bench players? Ok. Not to mention, Vucinic is one of our most key players. There is no way you can consider him a bench player.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,141
I disagree about Bonucci, he is a great defender and as of now and I wouldn't trade him for any other CB (ok maybe only Thiago Silva). We arguably have the best defense in europe and a large part of that is thanks to Marotta.

Well, I would say it is up to par, considering our success so far. It may have trouble in the latter CL stages, but that remains to be seen.

I don't see what the problem is with that considering we have a pretty strong squad right now that looks like it can be together for quite a few years.


From players signed 2011-12 onwards (besides returned loans), only 3 players signed have left. Pazienza, Elia & Lucio. Our base isn't going anywhere. This just goes to show that the 2010-12 period was an anomaly in terms of players leaving, as now not many players will be leaving in the near future.
But we still want to replace a lot of those players. Marotta loves the loan plus option to buy calls, which is fine, but he's still wasting time on players who eventually find themselves at another club. Time is money, so essentially this is a waste of money.

Just by judging some of these players before and after their Juve careers, I personally believe Conte deserves the credit for the success. Call me an ass or whatever, but it's completely obvious to me that we have a great manager on our hands that is making do with what we have, which needs to be far better. Barzagli was never this good with Palermo, and neither was Bonucci under anyone else. So the credit goes to Conte in that regard.

Hell, Barzagli failed in Germany.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
Yes andy, but you must look at the entire thing

quag, indeed is a bench player. But back then we couldnt get anything else, and he delivered back then.
Krasic was bought for del neri. he didnt manage to fix the marking on him. for conte, he didnt fit so had to be sold. its rather onfortunate.
Pepe, was a vital balance player in the 4-3-3, i think you underrate him a bit

Vucinic, i'm not quite sure. We would probably field him with drogba or Llorente. Its just stupid how much diffrence he can make.
but lets also not forget the notion that we had problems landing anything better due to financial restrictions.
Like right now, we must achieve break even, and this likely means there isnt really much money left for a player like jovetic/sanchez/suarez.
Vucinic+Llorente, will do so much for us

While the turnover indeed is high, you must consider the rise in value just about any of the signings he made, that is a frequent starter. i think once the building was done, and we switched more to talents like pogba, we have gotten some nice young prospects in the team.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,141
2 of our top 4 scorers are bench players? Ok. Not to mention, Vucinic is one of our most key players. There is no way you can consider him a bench player.
I consider him a bench player because at least 50% of this forum wants him benched. When you have so much volatility in what fans prefer for a striking force, you know you need better, more consistent forwards. And I don't even mind Vucinic, he's better than Matri ever was.

- - - Updated - - -

Yes andy, but you must look at the entire thing

quag, indeed is a bench player. But back then we couldnt get anything else, and he delivered back then.
Krasic was bought for del neri. he didnt manage to fix the marking on him. for conte, he didnt fit so had to be sold. its rather onfortunate.
Pepe, was a vital balance player in the 4-3-3, i think you underrate him a bit

Vucinic, i'm not quite sure. We would probably field him with drogba or Llorente. Its just stupid how much diffrence he can make.
but lets also not forget the notion that we had problems landing anything better due to financial restrictions.
Like right now, we must achieve break even, and this likely means there isnt really much money left for a player like jovetic/sanchez/suarez.
Vucinic+Llorente, will do so much for us

While the turnover indeed is high, you must consider the rise in value just about any of the signings he made, that is a frequent starter. i think once the building was done, and we switched more to talents like pogba, we have gotten some nice young prospects in the team.
I am looking at the whole thing, that is my point. I'm looking at all the signings from the standpoint of squad classification. The "building a base" phase should be over by now, but apparently it is not considering the turnover in the squad and even management. I know it's not an exact science, but we need to be wiser with decisions on players we know will not provide us with much quality.

If you look at a club like Man United, their senior squad turnover has always been quite low. But this is because Turd Ferguson is a much more careful and talented player developer and football brain. This is what we should be striving to become, guiding young players along into the first team. It's the opposite of the 90's.
 

ZoSo

Senior Member
Jul 11, 2011
41,656
Hindsight is always 20/20. To expect Marotta to make the right call everytime is ridiculous, considering even Moggi made bad transfers from time to time. Yes, he has made a few flop transfers, (Martinez, Elia, Motta) but look at our squad now and what it has achieved. For anyone to say the negatives outweight the positives of what Marotta has done... they must obviously be out of their mind.

Who will we replace? We really only need 2-3 players brought in, if that. I don't think anyone needs replacing, as one of our fowards could be moved to the bench.

Conte wasn't even around when Bonucci was signed. Bonucci wasn't good beforehand because he was a youth prospect and he has now turned into a great CB in only a couple of years. Just think of how much his long passing has improved.

But he still signed Barzagli, someone else might not have taken the gamble and he turned out to be one of the best CBs in Europe. Likewise with Pirlo, many thought he was past it and I'm sure many would not have taken the ~€3m/y gamble on him. These are not flukes either. I doubt Marotta would think Barzagli was going to be this good but for sure he was certain after enough evalution that he would be a solid defender here. And to sign that for only €300k is a steal.

- - - Updated - - -

I consider him a bench player because at least 50% of this forum wants him benched. When you have so much volatility in what fans prefer for a striking force, you know you need better, more consistent forwards. And I don't even mind Vucinic, he's better than Matri ever was.
I didn't realise what Juventuz wants decides whether the players play or not. The fact is, he is NOT a bench player and is our most important foward.
 

Bianconero_Aus

Beppe Marotta Is My God
May 26, 2009
81,107
I can understand people always want more for the team they support, but really, it does boggle the mind that one would still complain and say the negatives outweigh the positives (lol) at this point in our clubs history.

We still have a long road ahead of us and there still is obvious room for improvement in certain areas, but we are definitely on the right track in the grand scheme of things. There is clearly a good understanding between management and coach at the moment. Marotta has done a very good job for us not just on the field, but also financially too. He's made mistakes, but which SD doesn't? His good and useful signings easily outweigh his bad signings.

The signs for this clubs future are VERY promising. Our management and coach are all on the same page and that is the most important thing of all.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 88)