FCK with the formula (1 Viewer)

OP
Anders

Anders

Senior Member
Dec 13, 2002
3,134
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #82
    If they do qualify and draw Juventus, you should come down to København and join me in Parken. I wouldn't miss that for the world.
     
    OP
    Anders

    Anders

    Senior Member
    Dec 13, 2002
    3,134
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #84
    yeah... and they can do it. Today Rangers kinda shocked them with the early goal, but as time went by, FCK was actually the better team.

    My bro has got tickets for the 2nd leg... let's see if I can get my hands on one of them :devil: :D
     

    Zambrotta

    Senior Member
    Nov 16, 2001
    2,421
    #85
    Not here obviously. I only have a crappy one. I asked my friend to send me some pictures but for some reason it is impossible to send files over MSN. Another guy is in Spain...
     

    vitoria_Ally

    Senior Member
    Jul 14, 2002
    7,232
    #86
    Impossible??

    Oh right, you must have the same problems like Tom with ports or sth like that.
    But the friend can send them in a mail ;) Or maybe you both have icq? Perfect to sending files.
     

    Zambrotta

    Senior Member
    Nov 16, 2001
    2,421
    #87
    Yeah, mail should work. But it usually works to send files by MSN as I don't have a firewall and he does neither. I have tried to send and receive files with three persons today but it hasn't worked. It probably has something to do with our host which had 40 servers crashed yesterday because of some virus.
     
    OP
    Anders

    Anders

    Senior Member
    Dec 13, 2002
    3,134
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #88
    København gain upper hand
    Wednesday, 13 August 2003 (uefa.com)

    Danish champions FC København can be hopeful of claiming a place in the UEFA Champions League group stage for the first time in their short history after a well-deserved first-leg draw in Glasgow.

    Danes look confident
    Rangers FC, who competed the Scottish domestic treble last season, failed to produce anything like their best form in front of over 47,000 fans at Ibrox. And the Danes will feel confident of finishing the job in two weeks' time to complete the greatest achievement in their eleven-year existence.

    Lovenkrands opener
    Rangers made the perfect start when Peter Lovenkrands fired them in front after seven minutes. Visiting goalkeeper Balázs Rabóczki punched a Mikel Arteta free-kick straight into the Danish striker's path at the back post and he made no mistake.

    København take control
    Despite this setback, København soon began to assert themselves, taking control of midfield to the frustration of the home fans. Although Arteta went close on 23 minutes and Raboczki then kept out a Michael Mols effort, Rangers were given a warning of what was to come when Sibusiso Zuma powered in a low drive that tested goalkeeper Stefan Klos.

    Deserved equaliser
    The visitors claimed the goal their play merited five minutes into the second period when Dodi Jonsson turned neatly on the edge of the area and picked his spot in the bottom corner.

    Little impact
    Rangers manager Alex McLeish tried to revamp his lacklustre attack by introducing Scotland striker Steven Thompson and former FC Porto winger Nuno Capucho. However, they made little impact as København held firm to the delight of their band of travelling supporters.

    Midfield players praised
    København coach Hans Backe said: "I think the midfielders were excellent in closing down [Barry] Ferguson and Arteta. We really stopped the supply line. But for me the tie could still go either way and I expect Rangers will be in better condition when they come to Copenhagen."

    McLeish disappointed
    His Rangers counterpart, McLeish, said: "'I'm very disappointed in the way we played at the start of the second half. Købehavn got their goal in that period and grew in confidence. But the tie is till alive and I think by the time the second leg comes around some of my players will have a better level of fitness."
     

    Zambrotta

    Senior Member
    Nov 16, 2001
    2,421
    #90
    They are two of the best teams in the world and they have a great attendance. But I can agree that it is unfair because these two teams have no competition in the domestic league.
    Well this didn't say much...
     
    OP
    Anders

    Anders

    Senior Member
    Dec 13, 2002
    3,134
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #92
    ++ [ originally posted by Zambrotta ] ++
    They are two of the best teams in the world and they have a great attendance. But I can agree that it is unfair because these two teams have no competition in the domestic league.
    Well this didn't say much...
    I think you went to far on that one mate... They're good, but certainly not amongst the best in the world.

    If it was up to me, the champions of all countries would have instant acces to the competition, while 2,3,4 from England, Spain, Italy or whatever... should qualify for it. Either that or change the name of the tournament.
     

    Zambrotta

    Senior Member
    Nov 16, 2001
    2,421
    #93
    ++ [ originally posted by Kaliman ] ++


    I think you went to far on that one mate... They're good, but certainly not amongst the best in the world.

    If it was up to me, the champions of all countries would have instant acces to the competition, while 2,3,4 from England, Spain, Italy or whatever... should qualify for it. Either that or change the name of the tournament.
    Celtic is among top 25 at least and they have the best supporters in the world.

    Are you saying that the moldovian champions should be directly qualified to the group play?

    I don't know if they should change anything wih the Champions league. Some say that we should reduce the amount of games, some days I agree. I just don't know how to solve that. If we reduce the amount of teams then should we reduce the number of teams from England and Italy. Well that would lead to less big games. If you reduce the number of small teams that would mean that I would rarely be able to see big games with Djurgården.

    I think it should stay the way it is.
     

    vitoria_Ally

    Senior Member
    Jul 14, 2002
    7,232
    #94
    ++ [ originally posted by Zambrotta ] ++
    Okay here it is, but it is only temporary. It doesn't look like me and I hate sad pictures.
    People usually see their own pics much worse that they are.
    It looks good imo.
    How old are you, if you dont mind me asking?

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Anders, sorry for derailing your thread, I'm off now :angel:
     
    OP
    Anders

    Anders

    Senior Member
    Dec 13, 2002
    3,134
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #95
    ++ [ originally posted by Zambrotta ] ++

    Celtic is among top 25 at least and they have the best supporters in the world.
    oh yeah... if you include enough teams, they're "amongst" the best in the world. But I thought you meant like the top 10 or something like that.

    ++ [ originally posted by Zambrotta ] ++
    Are you saying that the moldovian champions should be directly qualified to the group play?

    I don't know if they should change anything wih the Champions league. Some say that we should reduce the amount of games, some days I agree. I just don't know how to solve that. If we reduce the amount of teams then should we reduce the number of teams from England and Italy. Well that would lead to less big games. If you reduce the number of small teams that would mean that I would rarely be able to see big games with Djurgården.

    I think it should stay the way it is.
    Damn... I knew someone would post something like that :irritate: :D
    No, the Moldovian champions should not, but I feel that at least the scottish, danish, norweigan, swedish and portuguese champions should be awarded a place...
     

    JuveCampione

    Senior Member
    Sep 21, 2002
    4,134
    #97
    ++ [ originally posted by Zambrotta ] ++
    They are two of the best teams in the world and they have a great attendance. But I can agree that it is unfair because these two teams have no competition in the domestic league.
    Well this didn't say much...
    they'r great clubs but not good enough to be in the CL every year.
    it's very unfair for other teams form other countires that have to fight really hard just to get a CL qualifying round spot.
    for Rangers and Celtic it's very easy.
    it's like Oceania getting a world cup automatic spot. it will always be Australia.

    so... I hope FCK will go through
     

    vitoria_Ally

    Senior Member
    Jul 14, 2002
    7,232
    #98
    ++ [ originally posted by Zambrotta ] ++


    :)
    I knew this question was coming up, I'll tell you if you give me a guess first...
    This is hard, cause I really suck on estimating people's age, looking at their pics.

    In general, looking at what you said, sometimes I saw you as 30 years old guy, sometimes like 15-16 years old.

    NO idea :wallbang::D

    18?
     

    Zambrotta

    Senior Member
    Nov 16, 2001
    2,421
    #99
    ++ [ originally posted by vitoria_Ally ] ++


    This is hard, cause I really suck on estimating people's age, looking at their pics.

    In general, looking at what you said, sometimes I saw you as 30 years old guy, sometimes like 15-16 years old.

    NO idea :wallbang::D

    18?
    Correct. Some say that I look younger than I am. Swedish people often look younger than they are. But now you only saw my face so...

    Ey, how old are you? My guess is 25.
     

    vitoria_Ally

    Senior Member
    Jul 14, 2002
    7,232
    ++ [ originally posted by Zambrotta ] ++


    Correct. Some say that I look younger than I am. Swedish people often look younger than they are. But now you only saw my face so...

    Ey, how old are you? My guess is 25.
    Actually this is such serious pic, so you look like 19 here.
    But I looked carefully at your area around eyes, beard, how you're shaved, and if you are... etc ;)
    And I compared with other pics of Swedish guys I know, so I shot this 18.

    Erm... may I ask, why 25?
    Interesting, some time ago, I've been told 16
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)