I know how it feels when it comes to reading these, so heres the google translation for the illiterate 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Opinion: Sentences to risk cancellation? According to Alberto Antinori the sentences of the Caf have been made not in perfect tuning with the Italian Constitution and the Charter of the Figc. What that, second it, could carry the Tar to cancel them. The criminal trial è regulated from the principle of the conflicting one in the formation of the test. The law of it assures the reasonable duration. Così recites, between l’altro, l’art.111 of our Constitution. Cià ² that of this process it jumps above all to the è eyes to) the haste (it sets up from European expirations) that l’organizzazione of the defense has not concurred; b) not the admission of tests and witnesses to defense; c) the conclusions dell’accusa formulated before having listened charge to it to you. The right to the defense comes evidently violato not only second l’art.111 of the Constitution, but also second l’art. 30, codicil 2 of the Charter of the Figc that it recites: “le relative norms all’ordinamento of the sport Justice must guarantee the right of difesa†. Always second the same Charter, l’art.37 codicil 5 and 6, the lists testifies them of the defense can be reduced but presses and the Federal Proxy (codicil 9) does not have to formulate the own demands to the term of the debate. But, you will say, that defended you want to organize and that tests and witnesses you want to produce, a lot all già you were written! Perhaps, a po’ of reason ce l’avete. Our inquisitori have not made a beautiful figure when the Gazette of the Sport has published equal par the sentences very before that these were of public dominion, answering così to the question of Ruperto that it believed to make one battered spiritosa: “Dite that the sentences già are written. You say to us also where, così we to them go to also read! †. Guido Rossi had guaranteed absolute transparency, but Ruperto (checché says some l’interessato and although the 110 books from he cure) successful è to you neanche not to at least guarantee the confidentiality until the sentence. And così it comes also sconfessato the president of the Juventus that, in tv, had chargeed the delay in the reading of the sentence all’intervento of someone on the judging commission. Hour, approvals the points to), b) and c), do not look at as the Tar can confirm how much deciding from the sport Justice. Consequently, not only these sentences will be cancelled, but us sarà to face the unavoidable actions of megarisarcimento you damn to cargo of the Figc. For this favorable è that the Process d’Appello of the sport Justice drastically takes in consideration how much admitted from the first degree, not reducing the been involved damages for the società cosicché, chissÃ, could also be arrived to a compromise. Meantime l’Avv. Giuseppe Benedict, Federal Judge for the juvenile field preannounces to Guido Rossi of wanting to leave its assignment: “The method used in and with the process induces to me urlare: the straight è un’altra what! You find an other judge .
Interesting stuff, BTW whose Alberto Altinori?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Opinion: Sentences to risk cancellation? According to Alberto Antinori the sentences of the Caf have been made not in perfect tuning with the Italian Constitution and the Charter of the Figc. What that, second it, could carry the Tar to cancel them. The criminal trial è regulated from the principle of the conflicting one in the formation of the test. The law of it assures the reasonable duration. Così recites, between l’altro, l’art.111 of our Constitution. Cià ² that of this process it jumps above all to the è eyes to) the haste (it sets up from European expirations) that l’organizzazione of the defense has not concurred; b) not the admission of tests and witnesses to defense; c) the conclusions dell’accusa formulated before having listened charge to it to you. The right to the defense comes evidently violato not only second l’art.111 of the Constitution, but also second l’art. 30, codicil 2 of the Charter of the Figc that it recites: “le relative norms all’ordinamento of the sport Justice must guarantee the right of difesa†. Always second the same Charter, l’art.37 codicil 5 and 6, the lists testifies them of the defense can be reduced but presses and the Federal Proxy (codicil 9) does not have to formulate the own demands to the term of the debate. But, you will say, that defended you want to organize and that tests and witnesses you want to produce, a lot all già you were written! Perhaps, a po’ of reason ce l’avete. Our inquisitori have not made a beautiful figure when the Gazette of the Sport has published equal par the sentences very before that these were of public dominion, answering così to the question of Ruperto that it believed to make one battered spiritosa: “Dite that the sentences già are written. You say to us also where, così we to them go to also read! †. Guido Rossi had guaranteed absolute transparency, but Ruperto (checché says some l’interessato and although the 110 books from he cure) successful è to you neanche not to at least guarantee the confidentiality until the sentence. And così it comes also sconfessato the president of the Juventus that, in tv, had chargeed the delay in the reading of the sentence all’intervento of someone on the judging commission. Hour, approvals the points to), b) and c), do not look at as the Tar can confirm how much deciding from the sport Justice. Consequently, not only these sentences will be cancelled, but us sarà to face the unavoidable actions of megarisarcimento you damn to cargo of the Figc. For this favorable è that the Process d’Appello of the sport Justice drastically takes in consideration how much admitted from the first degree, not reducing the been involved damages for the società cosicché, chissÃ, could also be arrived to a compromise. Meantime l’Avv. Giuseppe Benedict, Federal Judge for the juvenile field preannounces to Guido Rossi of wanting to leave its assignment: “The method used in and with the process induces to me urlare: the straight è un’altra what! You find an other judge .
Interesting stuff, BTW whose Alberto Altinori?
Buy on AliExpress.com
+ rep
over the prospect & Berlusconi is no fool) and I honestly believe the latter is a great man. Moratti isnt your everyday winner but he has shown to be a compassionate and caring man - the man of higher moral standards than Moggi, Berlusconi, Sensi, and I just cannot imagine Moratti cheating his way through - if he did he sure was bad at it.
