mark77 said:
Juve wants $$$ from the FIGC because they're in B-17pts + didn't get a fair trial + sold their best players + less TV money + no CL money.....
when the FIGC heard that they came back with: We want compensation from Juve's part because they made the Italian league look bad. WHAT A JOKE!!!
I agree with you mark. It is in the
right of Juve to make sure we get our case heard in the court. The threat of sanctions from FIGC, FIFA, and UEFA are simply unethical.
Anyway how do you envision our re-instatement to Serie A?
As far as I see it, FIGC is not going to change their initial verdict, because this means that Fiorentina, Lazio, and Milan (these bastards are free-riding on the fact that Juve is worse punished and hence we will take the initiative) will all over be the case and we may have chaos again. I mean Fiorentina couldnt take part in CL competition because of the whole fiasco, and they will surely go nuts if anything happens that voids the initial sentences.
This means we will have to take the case to TAR, and suppose we win it, FIGC have the option of lowering the penalty or re-instate us back to Serie A.
Even if FIGC win their case in TAR, they have very little to gain in making further punishment to Juve - they may do so in the act of rhetorical significance - but I doubt punishment will be severe because, lets face it, any sane reconstruction plan for Serie A must have Juve in it with our millions of Tifosi's in both Italia and around the world. So I say all the threats from FIGC, FIFA, and UEFA is just an empty threat - threat which cannot be imposed without hurting themselves.
I see a strong incentives for FIGC, UEFA and FIFA in preventing us taking the case to the TAR. They will want to do so with mininum cost so a lot of bluffs are being thrown ATM. But what I also see is that Juve have very little to loose by taking the case to the court because all these threats are essentially empty.
Help me on this, but is it possible for Juve and FIGC to have settlement off the court for withdrawing from the TAR once we lodge the repeal?
I think this is important element in the possible future development.