Ezequiel Lavezzi - AM RLC - PSG (23 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ocelot

Midnight Marauder
Jul 13, 2013
18,943
No, he isn't. He's a clown as you say. But why hate a clown? He's just a silly man. As for his qualities on the pitch, they are definitely still there. I can see why we'd be interested. But all things considered I would not go for him myself.
He's been very very subpar for seasons now, would come on high wages and is rather old. Not a single reason to go for him.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

j0ker

Capo di tutti capi
Jan 5, 2006
22,848
Serie A experience - check
Winger - check
Argentian connection with Pereyra and Dybala - check
Still youngish - check

I don't know what's there not to like about this deal.
 

Joe

Senior Member
Dec 20, 2009
14,980
Saponara will be bought in June IMO.
I hope so.

I'm all for Lavezzi in January on a short term contract. (maybe something like 2yrs + 1yr option) He's a quality player and will definitely help us while we compete on 3 fronts.

As long as he doesn't interfere with longterm prospects.
 

duranfj

Senior Member
Jul 30, 2015
8,773
Saponara or Lavezzi? More quantity over quality... We need an RB and an AM. We shouldn't play with wingers what we need is Morata + Dybala + Pogba near our strikers and that's not possible with two wingers
 

Joe

Senior Member
Dec 20, 2009
14,980
Saponara isn't a winger. He's a true trequartista.

Why is RB an importance in January when we have Lichtsteiner?
 

Xperd

'Toli Throater
Jun 1, 2012
32,621
Di Marzio says we're in advanced negotiations

- - - Updated - - -

This would be a fabulous move if it happens :tup:

Marotta :tup:
I know you're trolling but I surely won't be against this move.

Marotta has a job in his hands to offload some of the turds he signed over the summer.Attack has more quantity than quality.

- - - Updated - - -

Doubt we'll buy Saponara but incase we do, I am 100% sure Berardi won't be a Juventus player.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 22)