Seriously stfu, you were spamming with utterly unbearable shit, much worse then anything anyone else has said.
Not to mention doubting Eders quality when he stinks it up 2nd game in a row except late winner, and some of Conte's unimaginative choices that made Italy play one of the worst offensive games ever is hardly surprising to question during game.
Sweden had no sniff at Italy's goal all game. Eder was the player every person was mocking Conte for keeping on, scored a last minute golazo. So he cancelled out the opposition completely and the player he had faith in repaid that faith in spectacular fashion. I say that is job well done and everything worked according to his plan.
Funnily enough a lot of the people that were complaining about the lack of offensive power and were complaining about the poor attack are the same people who later said he should have kept it 0-0. Which one is it? is he supposed to try to win and thus have better attackers or is he supposed to close shop and keep it 0-0?
It seems to me that they were "omg conte cant beat sweden lololol" and then when he did win they went "omg stupid conte beat sweden when he really wanted a draw". Draw or win they will complain. That is a great example of haters gonna hate